Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

NUFC Transfer Rumours

Guest

by Guest
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

FloydianMag

FloydianMag

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, 1964 said:

Yeah, the notion that FFP is about fairness is a joke.   It's about making sure the clubs at the top earning more money are the ones that can spend the most and maintain status quo

The number of times FFP and FMV is mentioned maybe we should have a separate thread on both the issues until they’re no longer relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Beth

Beth

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, sempuki said:

Say we do have to sell one of Bruno, Isak or Botman, who do you vote for? Like deciding whether to stab yourself in your eyes, balls or cock.....

Bruno. He would command a fee of around 70-80m and would mean we could spend twice or thrice that on replacement(s), and praying Tonali hits the ground running next season.

 

Due to FFP there has to come a time when we will have to sell one of our prize assets if we want to get to the next level.

Link to post
Share on other sites
r0cafella

r0cafella

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

We wouldn’t make money on him if we did sell imo. 

Of course we would. He was about the same price as Hojlund but is an order of magnitude better. 
 

Would be idiotic to sell him mind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
SUPERTOON

SUPERTOON

Posted
Posted
Just now, r0cafella said:

Of course we would. He was about the same price as Hojlund but is an order of magnitude better. 
 

Would be idiotic to sell him mind. 

What did we spend 60 million ? No chance we get more than that imo with his injury record 

Link to post
Share on other sites
r0cafella

r0cafella

Posted
Posted
Just now, SUPERTOON said:

What did we spend 60 million ? No chance we get more than that imo with his injury record 

We do, easily. 
 

Oshimen is what 120m? Isak is half of that? Your undervaluing him massively. 
 

the major issue, is the market is small for such expensive players but he’s better than what Arsenal, Chelsea and Man United have. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ghandis Flip-Flop

Ghandis Flip-Flop

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Beth said:

Bruno. He would command a fee of around 70-80m and would mean we could spend twice or thrice that on replacement(s), and praying Tonali hits the ground running next season.

 

Due to FFP there has to come a time when we will have to sell one of our prize assets if we want to get to the next level.

he goes for significantly more than 70-80M, remember the fees midfielders with potential go for now

Link to post
Share on other sites
alexf

alexf

Posted
Posted (edited)

The fact we are even talking about having to sell one of our better players just shows what a nightmare FFP is for us and also how much of a backward step this season is having on our overall project. Frustrating. 

 

Would really hurt to see any of those 3 mentioned going to one of our rivals, just because they have a head start and can spend whatever they want because of it. 

 

 

Edited by alexf

Link to post
Share on other sites
TRon

TRon

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

We do, easily. 
 

Oshimen is what 120m? Isak is half of that? Your undervaluing him massively. 
 

the major issue, is the market is small for such expensive players but he’s better than what Arsenal, Chelsea and Man United have. 

 

He'd be the hardest to replace IMO. We can look all we like at strikers like Osimhen, but he's not coming here. World class strikers are a rare commodity, every club is after them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Beth

Beth

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

he goes for significantly more than 70-80M, remember the fees midfielders with potential go for now

He's 26 now, I doubt he is going to get any better unless he has a similar level of players around him. If he was 23/24 I think he would go for 100M.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TRon

TRon

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, mighty__mag said:

Andrey Santos, rumours. 

 

Chelsea to cancel loan with forest due to lack of minutes, apparently we wanted him back before he signed with Chelsea.

 

Can we loan another Chelsea player with Hall already on our books?

Link to post
Share on other sites
mighty__mag

mighty__mag

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

Can we loan another Chelsea player with Hall already on our books?

 

I don't know the answer, is it 2 PL in total?

 

And don't forget although he has featured the odd few minutes recently, Howes body language and response when quizzed on Hall last month was not convincing in the slightest, could Hall go back?

 

Edit:

 

I stopped being lazy:

 

They are:
- Premier League clubs may not register more than two players on loan at any one time.
- The maximum number of loans registrable in the same season is four, and, under no circumstances, shall more than one be from the same club at any one time.
- Premier League clubs cannot loan to another Premier League club a player they have acquired in the same transfer window.
- A Premier League club may loan not more than one of its goalkeepers to another Premier League club.

 

 

 

 

Edited by mighty__mag

Link to post
Share on other sites
BonesJones

BonesJones

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

He'd be the hardest to replace IMO. We can look all we like at strikers like Osimhen, but he's not coming here. World class strikers are a rare commodity, every club is after them.

 

Exactly this. Can anyone name a striker on Isak's level, that would be willing to join us, and wouldn't have a bunch of other clubs after them that can pay higher wages and are more established than us?

 

Hardest position to fill, so would be a major backwards step.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Beth

Beth

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, dcmk said:

Doesn't the fact that we have added a lot of new sponsorships deal mean that we no longer need to sell?

What percentage of that Sela deal was spent in the summer? I know we will be due some money from the CL but it won't be that much.

 

 

Edited by Beth

Link to post
Share on other sites
Barnes23

Barnes23

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Alberto2005 said:

Do you think? I get the feeling it's harder to find a quality attacker.

 

To find someone with Isak's specific profile and level of potential wouldn't be easy either, but I think we would at least be able to find a goalscorer to tide us over until such a player was available to sign. Replacing Wilson before replacing Isak could be one way of looking at it, although how much longer Wilson will be kept around is also up for debate for some. 

 

I think Bruno in the next couple of years will cement his status as one of the best midfielders in the world - if he leaves us, my expectation would have to be that it would be for a Barcelona or a Madrid (don't want to consider the idea he could end up at City). You only have to look at our performances and results when he isn't playing to see how he functions as the lynchpin of the whole side - there simply aren't many players around who can bring everything that he offers. Identifying and signing them would be incredibly difficult. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...