Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Guest

Recommended Posts

Tino’s a good transfer.  Smart. But the fee was another premium.  And we should’ve sold Trippier by now.  
 

Tonali is the Longstaff replacement but we should have signed someone else for half the money and wages. 
 

Knowing what we do now we should’ve sold Joelinton and Wilson too.  Joelinton on the super max don’t make sense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Tino’s a good transfer.  Smart. But the fee was another premium.  And we should’ve sold Trippier by now.  
 

Tonali is the Longstaff replacement but we should have signed someone else for half the money and wages. 
 

Knowing what we do now we should’ve sold Joelinton and Wilson too.  Joelinton on the super max don’t make sense. 

Agree to disagree - Tino's been a total non-factor this season. Shocking at times, even.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

 

Forgot about him but when I saw him last year he looked decent.

Loan with obligation to buy for 14 million. Shown more potential than Osula who we got for a similar price. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Upthemags said:

Agree to disagree - Tino's been a total non-factor this season. Shocking at times, even.

Still the right profile of signing and plenty of time to come good.  Only issue with the profile is the fee and was big.  
 

Barnes, Tonali, dare I say even Isak - wrong profile.  Should’ve only signed 1, the first we did.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Tino’s a good transfer.  Smart. But the fee was another premium.  And we should’ve sold Trippier by now.  

 

Yeah, as promising as Tino and Hall might be going forward, spending around £75 million on the pair for where the club is financially, regarding revenue coming in, was too much too soon.

 

We could and should have been a lot cuter with the moves we made. 

 

Some comparable talents in those positions that came to the Premier League, just as an example.

 

Kerkez the left back at Bournemouth for around £14 million and Hickey the right back at Brentford also for around £14 million.

 

Total of just under £30 million for the pair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it not the case next summer we are back to being able to spend £150m or whatever it was we spent under the new owners in their first window?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely we can buy two quality players a season from now on?

 

25-26 RW RCB

26-27 GK CF

27-28 2x Midfielders.

 

The ownership started needing 10 players for the 1st team to build around Schar. They’ve filled 9 of those spots with added backups dotted about. 10 with resigning Joelinton.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LFEE said:

Surely we can buy two quality players a season from now on?

 

25-26 RW RCB

26-27 GK CF

27-28 2x Midfielders.

 

The ownership started needing 10 players for the 1st team to build around Schar. They’ve filled 9 of those spots with added backups dotted about. 10 with resigning Joelinton.

 

 

I’m expecting RW and RCB in January tbh 

GK and CF in summer

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kingxlnc said:

I’m expecting RW and RCB in January tbh 

GK and CF in summer


Would be ideal but not sure we have the PSR headroom if we are assuming we are in the market for £50-70m players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, The College Dropout said:

Tino’s a good transfer.  Smart. But the fee was another premium.  And we should’ve sold Trippier by now.  
 

Tonali is the Longstaff replacement but we should have signed someone else for half the money and wages. 
 

Knowing what we do now we should’ve sold Joelinton and Wilson too.  Joelinton on the super max don’t make sense. 


Is this is a spoof? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LFEE said:

Is it not the case next summer we are back to being able to spend £150m or whatever it was we spent under the new owners in their first window?

 

 

Nope. 
We carry wages and amortisation. Isak costs on the books is the same now as the season he signed. 
 

Contract extensions reduce amortisation but in Bruno and Gordon’s case somewhat offset by a 50-100% increase in wages. 
 

We’ll find out next year. But I don’t think we are doing a great job of keeping the wages down.  We probably have 5 players on £100k+ and we wanted to add another. 

 

 

Edited by The College Dropout

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LFEE said:

Surely we can buy two quality players a season from now on?

 

25-26 RW RCB

26-27 GK CF

27-28 2x Midfielders.

 

The ownership started needing 10 players for the 1st team to build around Schar. They’ve filled 9 of those spots with added backups dotted about. 10 with resigning Joelinton.

 

 

3 years of the same midfield, RIP our aspirations 

 

In all seriousness, I'm sure you're thinking we would still sign young / cheap / potential players. I'm just thinking our midfield style is already looking unsustainable 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, janpawel said:

3 years of the same midfield, RIP our aspirations 

 

In all seriousness, I'm sure you're thinking we would still sign young / cheap / potential players. I'm just thinking our midfield style is already looking unsustainable 

I am. My main thinking is our restricted budget for the players we are looking at to improve the team and also EH’s methodology of not wanting to unsettle the squad with too many signings per season. Would still expect the odd Ousula and Ashby type signings to plug small gaps in squad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Nope. 
We carry wages and amortisation. Isak costs on the books is the same now as the season he signed. 
 

Contract extensions reduce amortisation but in Bruno and Gordon’s case somewhat offset by a 50-100% increase in wages. 
 

We’ll find out next year. But I don’t think we are doing a great job of keeping the wages down.  We probably have 5 players on £100k+ and we wanted to add another. 

 

 

 

This is the main we’ll probably have to sell a purple next summer anyway. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Collage said:

Are we writing off Tino now? He'll become great, just like Gordon.

No one was writing him off, just discussing the merits of signing him over greater needs in the team at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LFEE said:

Is it not the case next summer we are back to being able to spend £150m or whatever it was we spent under the new owners in their first window?

 

 

 

 

We seem to have thought that for the last two summers and the reality was we had to sell £35m of young talent just to come in under the PSR limit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SUPERTOON said:

No one was writing him off, just discussing the merits of signing him over greater needs in the team at the time.

It's sometimes beneficial to make signings based on opportunity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...