Tino Livramento

[Yorkie]

14 minutes ago, Jesse Pinkman said:

Jacob Murphy looked very good at RB yesterday and has clearly been learning from Trippier. I would cancel this transfer and focus on LB and CB with our remaining funds. 

 

Murphy isn't a long-term successor to Trippier though. 

 

This move, like Gordon, is clearly an opportunistic one. Howe/Ashworth see signing Trippier's long-term replacement as more effective squad management (given our resources) than upgrading on Burn/Targett. A left-back would be great but it's sensible to try and integrate Trippier's successor, particularly if the player you've identified for that role is available. 

 

I think we'll get a CB but we won't get a winger; Gordon is that player, we just signed him early. 

[nufc123]

13 minutes ago, Jesse Pinkman said:

Jacob Murphy looked very good at RB yesterday and has clearly been learning from Trippier. I would cancel this transfer and focus on LB and CB with our remaining funds. 

Livramento has looked very good for a whole season at Southampton at the age of 19, but its good to have options ready to step in.

[The Prophet]

If the recruitment team want to sign one of the most promising young full backs in the country rather than playing a winger out of position because he looked alright in a pre-season friendly, then serious questions need to be asked.

 

 

Edited August 7, 2023 by The Prophet

[Ritchie]

Cancel a transfer over one preseason game? Think I've heard it all now.

[Andy84]

Just now, Ritchie said:

Cancel a transfer over one preseason game? Think I've heard it all now.

You played alreet yesterday 

[Choppy Chop Chop]

3 minutes ago, Ritchie said:

Cancel a transfer over one preseason game? Think I've heard it all now.

This has to be nonsense we aren't a tuppenny hapenny club any more 

[localshop]

28 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Fucking hell, another one out of the blue

I would class him as a purple

[Chris_R]

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.

Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

[buzz]

1 minute ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.

Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

 

 

[SteV]

3 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.

Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

Did you used to work at Juventus?

[r0cafella]

4 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.

Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

We could have but that’s a gamble for Southampton as it’s likely Chelsea would never do business with them again. 

[Chris_R]

It wasn't a totally serious suggestion. Probably should've added a safety smiley.  

[AyeDubbleYoo]

1 hour ago, Jesse Pinkman said:

Jacob Murphy looked very good at RB yesterday and has clearly been learning from Trippier. I would cancel this transfer and focus on LB and CB with our remaining funds. 

You’re off your bonce

[arnonel]

Assume he has actually passed the medical? Good sign if true

 

 

[The College Dropout]

Juventus did that but it looked for more reasonable. 
 

It’s something we could’ve done if we had wanted their captain. Could justify a massive fee there and a smaller fee for Livra. 
 

But using the no-mark thing would have Chelsea running to the PL 

[LFEE]

Probably get announced 4/5pm today.

[Myleftboot]

2 hours ago, LFEE said:

Probably get announced 4/5pm today.

Nee way. 3pm Friday.

[Ben]

What a fuckin transfer window 8/10 geed up 

[Shearergol]

5 hours ago, Jesse Pinkman said:

Jacob Murphy looked very good at RB yesterday and has clearly been learning from Trippier. I would cancel this transfer and focus on LB and CB with our remaining funds. 

Hope this is a comedy post. If not, give your fucking head a shake man

[Hudson]

5 hours ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

You’re off your bonce

Heisenberg will do that you

[The Fountain]

5 hours ago, Chris_R said:

Too late I know, but just thinking about Chelsea's 50% add-on clause and Saints wanting to clear £xm after that had been paid.

Could we not have "bought" some no-mark reserve player from Southampton for £20m, they throw in Livramento for free, Southampton net everything they want, we pay less and Chelsea get fucked?

RTG would explode mate.

[khay]

Needs to have medical before completed in the title. Keep think he has completed the move. 

[STM]

Swear it's been a week since we agreed a fee.

 

Reckon Ashworth is one of those fine toothcomb fellas when it comes to contracts.

[Chris_R]

1 hour ago, The Fountain said:

RTG would explode mate.

Yeah let's not do that then.

[Gawalls]

3 hours ago, Shearergol said:

Hope this is a comedy post. If not, give your fucking head a shake man

I don’t know - using this logic I had a round of golf tonight and went round in about 120, terrible but on one par 3 I got the Green in one and birdied it so I’m gonna enter the open.