Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, RS said:

Was there any reason he started?  I did raise an eyebrow when he was named. Perhaps because I don’t rate him. 

 

As stated, Burn suspended, but then arguably had Krafth not got injured, he would have started alongside Schar rather than kelly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TK-421 said:

 

As stated, Burn suspended, but then arguably had Krafth not got injured, he would have started alongside Schar rather than kelly.

Na, Kelly was always starting in Burns place. We get wrecked aerially if we are playing with Schar and Krafh. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very poor for the first goal and had a few nervy moments, but he handled Antonio very well and made a very good tackle second half to stop a possible goal. 
 

I’m all for calling out the negatives but let’s not ignore the good things he did too.

 

this is not necessarily a defence of him, as I’d be putting Burn straight back in, but more a point that his performance wasn’t as calamitous as I’m reading online. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NWMag said:

Very poor for the first goal and had a few nervy moments, but he handled Antonio very well and made a very good tackle second half to stop a possible goal. 
 

I’m all for calling out the negatives but let’s not ignore the good things he did too.

 

this is not necessarily a defence of him, as I’d be putting Burn straight back in, but more a point that his performance wasn’t as calamitous as I’m reading online. 

 

He was at fault for both goals, so no matter what he did right, pretty hard to overlook that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...