SUPERTOON Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Ornstein mentioned that the mooted deal was meant to be dcl @mid to high 30’s with Minteh at low to mid 30’s. Absolutely mental price for someone in the last year of his deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, Nucasol said: I’m on the bus with those who said it was overinflated and we got cold feet because the Cartel / EPL Narks started squealing. Possibility we revisit this I reckon. That’s how I read what he said too. That being said as things stand the PL had no rules covering these kind of deals as fas as I’m aware. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 2 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Absolutely mental price for someone in the last year of his deal. As much as I dislike myself for saying this but the proposed nature of the deal means inflated prices make sense for both parties. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Just now, r0cafella said: As much as I dislike myself for saying this but the proposed nature of the deal means inflated prices make sense for both parties. If so, I wonder why it fell apart. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, r0cafella said: That’s how I read what he said too. That being said as things stand the PL had no rules covering these kind of deals as fas as I’m aware. I think it’s covered under their generic catch-all rule of “acting in good faith”. Same one ironically we could use to nail Ashworth to the cross for his email leaks to Ineos Utd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, r0cafella said: As much as I dislike myself for saying this but the proposed nature of the deal means inflated prices make sense for both parties. Even more so if we could use it to inflate “Fair Market Value” for a Wilson sale to Saudi. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, Nucasol said: I think it’s covered under their generic catch-all rule of “acting in good faith”. Same one ironically we could use to nail Ashworth to the cross for his email leaks to Ineos Utd. I very much doubt it as it’s impossible to prove we weren’t. Minteh is a hot young prospect with multiple suitors and DCL is a player we’ve been linked with for awhile. @SUPERTOON I wonder if DCL’s demand were the block as he’s on his last year and might be looking for a big final payday elsewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abacus Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 (edited) I wonder how many clubs would fail the acting in good faith test over the years? Edited June 26 by Abacus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, Abacus said: I wonder how many clubs would fail the acting in good faith test over the years? Us mainly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 Need to can the fuck out of any further discussions about DCL now that Minteh is off to Brighton. Leave Everton to get themselves out of their own hole Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weezertron Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 Close it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 2 minutes ago, Weezertron said: Close it. Burn it. Then salt the earth so it never grows back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 Scorched 🌍 policy. Hope we see the last of this now we don’t have the begging bowl out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 On 26/06/2024 at 14:23, r0cafella said: @SUPERTOON I wonder if DCL’s demand were the block as he’s on his last year and might be looking for a big final payday elsewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 With Wilson now seemingly all but knackered, and January being Everton’s last chance to get any kind of fee for Calvert-Lewin, I wonder… Granted, it seems his wage demands were what scuppered any chance of it happening in the summer, but if we feel like we won’t have Wilson for much of the rest of the season, and his wages will be gone in the summer anyway, we could potentially be more flexible in that regard. And before anyone says ‘rEpLaCiNg oNe cRoCk wItH aNoThEr’, DCL has missed one league game (through illness) since September last year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 RePlAcInG a CrOcK wItH a ShIt PlAyEr Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 (edited) Hopefully Mitchell has better ideas mate. Otherwise there’s no point.. Edited December 11 by Ronson333 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 10 minutes ago, SteV said: With Wilson now seemingly all but knackered, and January being Everton’s last chance to get any kind of fee for Calvert-Lewin, I wonder… Granted, it seems his wage demands were what scuppered any chance of it happening in the summer, but if we feel like we won’t have Wilson for much of the rest of the season, and his wages will be gone in the summer anyway, we could potentially be more flexible in that regard. And before anyone says ‘rEpLaCiNg oNe cRoCk wItH aNoThEr’, DCL has missed one league game (through illness) since September last year. And how many has he scored in that period of time ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzz Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 Bruno out, DCL and Tavernier in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 A cf is exactly where we need to be going abroad for. DCL has premier league experience but his stats do not tally to his price tag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 1 minute ago, Colos Short and Curlies said: A cf is exactly where we need to be going abroad for. DCL has premier league experience but his stats do not tally to his price tag His price tag will be very little with his contract up the summer, it his wages that would potentially be the issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 7 minutes ago, r0cafella said: And how many has he scored in that period of time ? Nine in the league. But Everton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 5 minutes ago, r0cafella said: And how many has he scored in that period of time ? I don't even want DCL as I think we can be smarter in the market. However, you cannot overlook the team he plays for and how that impacts his performance. Especially now he has checked out completely as he is no longer wanting to stay there. Reminds me of how poor a goal threat Wood looked for us, and so many thought it was hilarious Forest paid what they did for him. And now not so funny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 8 minutes ago, SteV said: Nine in the league. But Everton. Yeah I hear that, just not sure he's worth the crazy wages we already turned him down for. He'd be another player signed with no resale value which is really bad when you need to player trade. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 11 Share Posted December 11 3 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Yeah I hear that, just not sure he's worth the crazy wages we already turned him down for. He'd be another player signed with no resale value which is really bad when you need to player trade. Does he have to be offered more or would he take the best offer even if it meant less than he's currently on ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now