Jump to content

Paul Mitchell to leave club by mutual consent at end of June (Official)


Recommended Posts

Just now, andycap said:

Cheeky arsehole. 

Howe will go back to his way of doing things. 


But why are you just assuming the worst at every turn? We don’t know that this has anything to do with a disagreement with Howe or his way of doing things. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

His opening gambit was utterly bizarre and set the tone for ruffling Howe's feathers and fingers being pointed at him tbh. Plenty said as much at the time and Howe had tons in the bank even before the success of this season.

 

I thought it had all been resolved after all of that drama, but it seems like for whatever reason now it's not going to work out.


I agree, he shouldn’t have spoken in public, just like Howe shouldn’t have spoken the way he did before the season started. 
 

Still, my point stands, we don’t know what’s been going on behind the scenes (if much at all) but that’s why I think it’s wrong to point fingers without facts/info. I guess some people always need a scapegoat. There might not even be one in this case and that’s why I don’t like it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, andycap said:

So I'd assume we will be back to the old transfer routine. 

Such a waste. 

Before Mitchell came we’d signed Bruno,Botman,Tonali,Isak. I quite like that transfer routine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Gallowgate Toon said:

Still maintain it's a pretty overrated position and many of these 'strategic' people stay no longer than a year or two. More often than not, they just add another layer of ego.

 

 

Who's going to do the deals though?

 

You can't have scouts negotiating everything can you, that's not their job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, andycap said:

Because Mitchell was revamping it if he leaves howe will probably go back to the way he does things. 

Howes way of doing things:

 

Absolute Hits: Trippier, Bruno, Burn, Botman, Isak, Gordon, Barnes, Hall, Livramento, Pope, Tonali

 

Provided Value in some way: Wood, Targett, Minteh, Kelly.

 

Too Early to Tell: Osula.

 

Miss: Vlach, Ashby, Karius

 

Yeah fuck that strategy, too many hits for my liking :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Howe has never wanted a director of football. He just needs a head of recruitment to get players he wants in. He’s starting to build something here now that doesn’t require someone overseeing him.

 

In fairness to Ashworth, in that aspect he was pretty good, but that ship has sailed. Never go backwards.

 

Recruit from within unless they have a gem lined up. I suspect the new CEO will be a heavyweight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No top-level club these days has one person calling all the shots. I agree the manager should have the final say. But the days of a manager doing everything is well and truly gone.
That's two SD gone in two years. If Howe was to leave and take the England job next year with his entire backroom staff, we're back to square one with no infrastructure of plan in place.

Hard to have a view on PM but it's no coincidence that our targets always range in such extremes from unknown french and brazilians to english players like Trafford and DCL. 

Maybe the Wilson talk was the final straw - who knows! Interested to see what happens next, I totally trust EH on the first team, but we still need to build the club from the bottom up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 54 said:

Howes way of doing things:

 

Absolute Hits: Trippier, Bruno, Burn, Botman, Isak, Gordon, Barnes, Hall, Livramento, Pope, Tonali

 

Provided Value in some way: Wood, Targett, Minteh, Kelly.

 

Too Early to Tell: Osula.

 

Miss: Vlach, Ashby, Karius

 

Yeah fuck that strategy, too many hits for my liking :lol:

 

I'm fine with this if it's sustainable i.e. not being pressured to sell to prevent a pts deduction. 

 

You need a money man in there I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Weezertron said:

 

I'm fine with this if it's sustainable i.e. not being pressured to sell to prevent a pts deduction. 

 

You need a money man in there I think.

Or we need to do better at getting income from other avenues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Mitchell will be replaced obviously. It will just be someone that can align somewhat with Howe.  Everything Mitchell said suggested a significant departure from how things were. And Howe didn’t have total control of that either. 


I don’t think there is necessarily a lack of alignment. Howe seems to fully accept our PSR position and he’s always been good at coaching and improving non-star players. So where would the lack of alignment be? 
 

Like we’ve discussed on here loads of times, most of the chat around Howe’s need for control is absolutely nonsense and completely made up.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 54 said:

Howes way of doing things:

 

Absolute Hits: Trippier, Bruno, Burn, Botman, Isak, Gordon, Barnes, Hall, Livramento, Pope, Tonali

 

Provided Value in some way: Wood, Targett, Minteh, Kelly.

 

Too Early to Tell: Osula.

 

Miss: Vlach, Ashby, Karius

 

Yeah fuck that strategy, too many hits for my liking :lol:

Where's Kuol? 🤣

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr Jinx said:

Howe has never wanted a director of football. He just needs a head of recruitment to get players he wants in. He’s starting to build something here now that doesn’t require someone overseeing him.

 

In fairness to Ashworth, in that aspect he was pretty good, but that ship has sailed. Never go backwards.

 

Recruit from within unless they have a gem lined up. I suspect the new CEO will be a heavyweight.

I think there should be someone to provide healthy tension to Howe.  And so to spread some of the liability and influence.  He had that with Staveley and Ashworth but seems like Staveley didn’t control the numbers well enough.   
 

 

For better and for worse Staveley ran the club and had the keys to the fortune. Along with Nickson, Ashworth and Howe they identified players and ultimately she has final say. We miss that conduit between the owners and management.  I don’t think Eales ever had enough influence over PIF and he was misaligned with the old regime.  
 

The old regime had its issues. They didn’t agree on Joelinton’s contract.  But I think th we tensions were necessary. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The turbulence at the top end of the club and a lack of movement on key infrastructure is a concern imo.

 

Fair play to Eddie for keeping it together beyond that point.  Big summer needed.

 

 

Edited by Sima

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sima said:

The turbulence at the top end of the club and a lack of movement on key infrastructure is a concern imo.

 

Fair play to Eddie for keeping it together beyond that point.  Big summer needed.

 

 

 

Aye big summer to potentially things jump forward at pace stadium, training ground new location, sponsor of training ground  sponsor of training kit , new ceo, new technical director, Isak entering contract negotiations? Contract renewals for players and players to sell I hope some of this is road mapped out regardless of soon to be missing staff in key positions. 

 

 

Edited by nufcjmc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...