Jump to content

Ipswich Town 0-4 Newcastle United - 21/12/24


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Gawalls said:

Really wonder if he was Mitchell’s signing and Howe just doesn’t want him here.

Howe didn't play Hall all of last season. Gordon wasn't a starter from the off. 

 

Doesn't mean a thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gazza ladra said:

Howe didn't play Hall all of last season. Gordon wasn't a starter from the off. 

 

Doesn't mean a thing.

He was a Tindale/Eddie signing

 

 

Edited by Weezertron

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Weezertron said:

He was a Tindale/Eddie signing

 

 

 

So what you're saying is...

 

All the poor signings = Eddie

All the good signings = Backroom staff

 

Got it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 54 said:

So what you're saying is...

 

All the poor signings = Eddie

All the good signings = Backroom staff

 

Got it.

 

haha no. When did I say that. I just know for a fact that Osula was a Tindale pick, as does everyone else when Eddie told us in pressers. 

 

I never said Osula was a bad signing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, KDT said:

It’s nice when we’re just miles better than another team, even after the last couple of years it still takes some getting used to.

And just a worry that we are a couple of Injuries away from, not exactly struggling, but being way off what we can be.

 

 

It's coming though.......its coming !

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Heron said:

What poor signings? :lol:

Kuol? I'm reaching I know... 😄

 

The Greek, but I think that was necessary for PSR reasons, no?

 

 

Edited by Joe1984

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Joe1984 said:

Nice. Guess I know what I'm watching. Thanks! 😄

I'll record it and watch at half time of the Pittsburgh/Ratbirds NFL game.......and no doubt watch it several times again as my Steelers get beat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love going into Christmas with any old win just before,  so much the better with a bunch of them and a ton of goals, its got all the warmth of being handed a glass of something by somebody. Just feels right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stifler said:

If you are behind the goal line, it’s classed as being on the goal line. He was partly on the goal line, and so was the defender.

Yeah, both have one foot inside the goal so Burn can never be offside there. The goal should have been allowed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Toon No9 said:

Yeah, both have one foot inside the goal so Burn can never be offside there. The goal should have been allowed.

Technically you need to have two players keeping it from being offside. Keeper+1. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Missed this today but was delighted when I snuck out to get signal and saw it was 3 nil at half time, put me in a great mood.

 

Watched it since and these are my takes. Although everything else is different, I noticed shades of 21/22 about our midfield. Bruno is just a very good footballer in general, but you really get quality over quantity when he plays further forward. I thought he was fantastic today and Tonali was too, playing the 100x better 24/25 version of Shelvey.

 

Willock just needs game time, but so long as he does he'll be a massive asset again, you can see it.

 

Isak brilliant again, I'm sort of lost for words a bit tbh.

 

Gordon is close to looking amazing again and it's nigh on all down to finishing at the moment.

 

Murphy is sort of the opposite, not necessarily a player that looks amazing but is really effective.

 

For posterity:

 

Dubravka 7

Livramento 7

Schär 7

Burn 7

Hall 7

Bruno 9

Tonali 8.5

Willock 6.5

Murphy 9

Isak 10

Gordon 6.5

 

 

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nemtizz said:

 

2 full pages of threads just from the game today, what the fuck.

 

Seems like a decent time to casually gesture at the mod tip jar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why was BDB's goal disallowed.

he was on the goal line with the defender.

past that and you're off the pitch and cant draw lines.

or is it to do with the keeper's position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, huss9 said:

why was BDB's goal disallowed.

he was on the goal line with the defender.

past that and you're off the pitch and cant draw lines.

or is it to do with the keeper's position.

If you are past the pitch, you are classed as being on the line.

1 defender looked to be on the line with him, and the keepers arse looked to also be on the line. It should have been allowed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...