Newcastle United 3-0 Aston Villa - 26/12/24

[Hanshithispantz]

32 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

It would be obscenely draconian to scrub it off even without the deflection but as you say, the deflection makes it an outright error from the VAR. Fucking shite.

 

Bin off the farcical offside application and we've got five at Ipswich n'all. 

What is the actual rule?

 

That's never a penalty at the other end. Accidental handballs with your arm by our side will be disallowed if it goes straight in, but will stand if it was going wide and was deflected in?

[David Edgar]

6 minutes ago, joeyt said:

 

And him describing Gordon's goal as "crazy" suggesting it was fortunate

 

Not at all. You are being really weird now. Really weird.

 

 

[Chris_R]

57 minutes ago, NSG said:

Something that annoyed me a little bit is that I think Bruno’s goal should have stood.
 

If the ball had gone in directly off his arm then yes disallow it, but the sizeable deflection off the defender on the post after Bruno’s touch actually turned the ball in. The deflection from Bruno’s arm was going wide and therefore the goal would have been deemed an OG rather than a Bruno goal, meaning his touch was an “assist” rather than him being the goal scorer.

 

 

 

 

Haha yes I thought this. Didn't watch the replays in real-time as I got distracted but on MOTD I immediately thought that. It's an OG, not a Bruno goal, so the handball goes back to being accidental and irrelevant.

[LFEE]

1 hour ago, joeyt said:

I can be persuaded either way with the red card. My initial reaction was he didn't mean it

I get what you mean but as I explained after the game to a Villa fan thinking it was a bit harsh you’ve got to put the incident to one side and piece together Dhuran’s actions leading up to it as he got more and more frustrated.

 

Schar was catching him offside a couple of times quite cutely and also beating him to the ball by reading the game better frustrating him then also he was took off the free kick Digne took which he showed frustration with also.

 

Turned to the lad next to me and said he’s losing his head a bit. Next thing he rakes Schar with each foot with at least one of them avoidable 

[joeyt]

Just now, David Edgar said:

 

Not at all. You are being really weird now. Really weird.

 

 

 

How was the goal crazy?

[David Edgar]

29 minutes ago, RS said:

It’s David Edgar’s terrible crack where he drops an unnecessary negative post and fucks off. I could understand and have done it myself in the Ashley/wank manager era but this team is set-up to compete and be successful.
 

However, predicting a defeat after 10 minutes and then blaming not predicting a sending off as a reason for his prediction not coming to fruition is mental and was rightly called out.

 

 

 

 

I didn't drop a negative post and fuck off. I posted all game. 

 

I also gave a full overview of my opinion which has been completely ignored for these simplistic barbs.

 

Still, you guys do you.

[David Edgar]

1 minute ago, joeyt said:

 

How was the goal crazy?

 

Crazy good. 

 

My first post about the goal was just wow three times. But that doesn't fit the narrative you are trying so weirdly to keep spinning joey. Bless you.

[El Prontonise]

2 minutes ago, David Edgar said:

 

Not at all. You are being really weird now. Really weird.

 

 

 

[David Edgar]

3 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

 

Feel like I'm being baited into getting banned. 

 

I've put my entire opinion about why I felt uncertain of the result before the red card only for it to be completely ignored and then have another wave of these super ignorant and super simplistic posts about me being so negative and wrong. I'm just using this space to express my opinion on the game. The weird lot are joey and co who are putting in more effort on me than the game, yet are wilfully ignorant of anything and everything I have posted that doesn't fit their weird campaigns. 

 

 

Edited 16 hours ago by David Edgar

[Southern Geordie]

33 minutes ago, The Butcher said:

Wouldn't have complained too much if the ref had given him a yellow.

 

Reading on Villatalk and they call our players for cheats. Forgot to mention Rogers throwing himself to the ground, holding his face, when Joelinton just nicked him in the chest.

Brummie Mackems, always the victims and their players can do nothing wrong.

[Fak]

Chaps man, it’s Xmas. If you thought we pissed it from the first whistle to the last: that’s fine. If you thought we were getting dominated at some stage of the game and were worried we were gonna throw the game away: that’s fine. 
 

It’s a game of opinions, just let it go.  

[NE27]

Lads all need a few more pigs and blankets in their life, and a nice sloe gin.

 

 

Edited 15 hours ago by NE27

[joeyt]

24 minutes ago, David Edgar said:

 

Feel like I'm being baited into getting banned. 

 

I've put my entire opinion about why I felt uncertain of the result before the red card only for it to be completely ignored and then have another wave of these super ignorant and super simplistic posts about me being so negative and wrong. I'm just using this space to express my opinion on the game. The weird lot are joey and co who are putting in more effort on me than the game, yet are wilfully ignorant of anything and everything I have posted that doesn't fit their weird campaigns. 

 

 

 

 

I think I'd speak for a few to say the only agenda and campaign involved here is from you and the negative posting. 

 

I'm sure you said "Kill iz" before a game recently that we won comfortably and saying that Tonali has saved Howe. It's just negativity for negativity sake and nothing constructive. Whenever we do well there always seems to be a caveat to your posts "Ipswich were shite", "Villa look more likely to win" etc

[David Edgar]

... and then have another wave of these super ignorant and super simplistic posts about me being so negative and wrong. 

[wormy]

I'd love to be vindicated in my opinion on that red by any appeal getting time added for frivolity. 

[BonesJones]

11 hours ago, wormy said:

 

Have you never played football, Bones? There was only ever going to be one place his foot ended up to avoid Schar decapitating his penis like the thug he is! 

 

I have played football, I was a left back. Opinion valid.

[toon25]

Just watching the highlights. Absolutely brilliant performance. The midfield 3 again showing that they've found their positions. Tonali everywhere. And Isak, man. Nothing short of world class. His ball control makes him a constant threat - defenders don't know what to do with him.

[Joe1984]

14 minutes ago, joeyt said:

 

I think I'd speak for a few to say the only agenda and campaign involved here is from you and the negative posting. 

 

I'm sure you said "Kill iz" before a game recently that we won comfortably and saying that Tonali has saved Howe. It's just negativity for negativity sake and nothing constructive. Whenever we do well there always seems to be a caveat to your posts "Ipswich were shite", "Villa look more likely to win" etc

In defense of David I'd just like to point out 1 thing...

 

Ipswich WERE shite... 😄

[NSG]

57 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

What is the actual rule?

 

That's never a penalty at the other end. Accidental handballs with your arm by our side will be disallowed if it goes straight in, but will stand if it was going wide and was deflected in?

Yeah so basically if it had been Bruno’s goal, it would have been disallowed and fair enough. But because the deflection off Bruno was going wide and it hit the defender then technically it’s an own goal (if it was going in it would have been Bruno’s goal and rightfully disallowed).

 

Theres no way there is any way they could have checked that because it was an instantaneous decision, it took me a good few replays to find one to confirm it was going wide.

[wormy]

6 minutes ago, BonesJones said:

 

I have played football, I was a left back. Opinion valid.

 

Aye prolly left back in the dressing room!!! Am I right!!!

[Shearergol]

2 hours ago, Lush Vlad said:

He was very unfortunate. He tried to miss him on 3 separate occasions by moving his legs in Schar’s direction.  

I had to swerve numerous times before mowing down the cyclist, officer.

[astraguy]

Are they appealing it? Thought it would of broke by now considering they play Sunday 

[GeordieDazzler]

Not sure how they can appeal it, it’s not a clear and obvious error. In real time in the ground it looked nasty and intentional.
 

That’s what I saw and the ref saw. Intentional or not he’s stood on him twice VAR would only have taken action if he hadn’t. They aren’t there to debate intentionality, ref saw a player get stood on and he did. 

[Tsunami]

Why was Rogers given a free ride in the media for trying to get Joelinton sent off and McGinn immediately getting into Taylor’s ear for well over a minute? 

[huss9]

had never heard of morgan rogers prior to this season.

was he just as good at boro?

signing of the season?