Jump to content

Newcastle United 3-0 Ipswich Town - 26/04/2025


Recommended Posts

Just now, Doops said:

Willock is neither here nor there all half. I'd take him off and put Gordon at 10


He has been making some good runs and found pockets of space. But for the most part. He has marked himself out the game or worse, got in the way. 
 

I know players need minutes to get back to form. But he has been so bad this season since a few decent early performances. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worried Man Utd will sign Delap as he is exactly what they need. Would be a brilliant signing for us, could play with Isak when needed as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

How's it not a penalty like? 😂 

He gets in front of enciso bruno plays a perfectly weighted throughball that Murphy would definitely of reached. 

So you can't just pull a player back like that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty?

Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone comes on for Willock it should be Miley. A goal up against ten men, there’s no need to do anything over the top.

 

And if Joelinton is out for a few games another CM needs to be played into form.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought we were absolutely wank until about 5 mins left after they’d made the sub. Far too formulaic going forward and so many crosses to no one.

 

Thankfully they’re too thick to be snide beyond time-wasting and fucked themselves over. Now let’s get this won and on to the next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lenny said:

For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty?

Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me.

Couldn't understand the co comms bleating on about there being no aggressive intent, as if that matters when he's fouled Murphy in the box 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gazza ladra said:

If there was ever game to get Willock some game time it's a relegated, 10-ten man Ipswich at home. 

Lets see if he wakes up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, andycap said:

How's it not a penalty like? 😂 

He gets in front of enciso bruno plays a perfectly weighted throughball that Murphy would definitely of reached. 

So you can't just pull a player back like that. 

I don't think it's a penalty. It's very soft.

 

But it does have me confused a bit, as you're right, he would have reached the ball. So no reason for him to go down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, LiquidAK said:

Couldn't understand the co comms bleating on about there being no aggressive intent, as if that matters when he's fouled Murphy in the box 

 

Its Enscisco. Should be an auomatic foul and card based on that alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lenny said:

For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty?

Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me.

Because touching Murphy’s arm causes his legs to just stop working and crash to the ground? He didn’t actually grab him and drag his arm back with any force.

 

I’d be furious if that was given against us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aiston said:

All the wtf decisions from the ref but it's the +1 minute pissing me off most :lol:

 

I know, its like that's the final proof he didn't have a clue, wasn't even a remotely decent guess, the other stuff was at least up for debate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Lordshola said:

Because touching Murphy’s arm causes his legs to just stop working and crash to the ground? He didn’t actually grab him and drag his arm back with any force.

 

I’d be furious if that was given against us.

Agreed.  But evened up the Bruno goal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LiquidAK said:

Couldn't understand the co comms bleating on about there being no aggressive intent, as if that matters when he's fouled Murphy in the box 

He does my nut in this bloke on co comms

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lenny said:

For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty?

Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me.

Yeah I dont get it lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...