Lush Vlad Posted Saturday at 15:02 Share Posted Saturday at 15:02 Just now, Doops said: Willock is neither here nor there all half. I'd take him off and put Gordon at 10 He has been making some good runs and found pockets of space. But for the most part. He has marked himself out the game or worse, got in the way. I know players need minutes to get back to form. But he has been so bad this season since a few decent early performances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaj Posted Saturday at 15:02 Share Posted Saturday at 15:02 Worried Man Utd will sign Delap as he is exactly what they need. Would be a brilliant signing for us, could play with Isak when needed as well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted Saturday at 15:02 Share Posted Saturday at 15:02 always nice to see Chris Hughton in the studio Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted Saturday at 15:02 Share Posted Saturday at 15:02 How's it not a penalty like? 😂 He gets in front of enciso bruno plays a perfectly weighted throughball that Murphy would definitely of reached. So you can't just pull a player back like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUICE690 Posted Saturday at 15:02 Share Posted Saturday at 15:02 Two games in a row Ipswich have had a player sent off. Dummies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted Saturday at 15:03 Share Posted Saturday at 15:03 Just now, Lush Vlad said: I know players need minutes to get back to form. Had plenty of minutes since new year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted Saturday at 15:03 Share Posted Saturday at 15:03 For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty? Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted Saturday at 15:04 Share Posted Saturday at 15:04 Bruno Tonali Gordon Murphy Barnes Isak Why not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamPS Posted Saturday at 15:04 Share Posted Saturday at 15:04 If anyone comes on for Willock it should be Miley. A goal up against ten men, there’s no need to do anything over the top. And if Joelinton is out for a few games another CM needs to be played into form. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza ladra Posted Saturday at 15:04 Share Posted Saturday at 15:04 If there was ever game to get Willock some game time it's a relegated, 10-ten man Ipswich at home. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted Saturday at 15:04 Share Posted Saturday at 15:04 Have teams worked Willock out as in clatter him and his mind goes and his game follows. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted Saturday at 15:04 Share Posted Saturday at 15:04 Bring Willock off, Gordon can play a free role from #10. Bruno & Tonali should offer enough cover. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted Saturday at 15:05 Share Posted Saturday at 15:05 Thought we were absolutely wank until about 5 mins left after they’d made the sub. Far too formulaic going forward and so many crosses to no one. Thankfully they’re too thick to be snide beyond time-wasting and fucked themselves over. Now let’s get this won and on to the next. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted Saturday at 15:05 Share Posted Saturday at 15:05 1 minute ago, Lenny said: For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty? Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me. Couldn't understand the co comms bleating on about there being no aggressive intent, as if that matters when he's fouled Murphy in the box Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted Saturday at 15:05 Share Posted Saturday at 15:05 1 minute ago, gazza ladra said: If there was ever game to get Willock some game time it's a relegated, 10-ten man Ipswich at home. Lets see if he wakes up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted Saturday at 15:05 Share Posted Saturday at 15:05 Would bring Miley on pretty soon into the 2nd half for Willock, should be plenty of space for him to work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted Saturday at 15:05 Share Posted Saturday at 15:05 1 minute ago, andycap said: How's it not a penalty like? 😂 He gets in front of enciso bruno plays a perfectly weighted throughball that Murphy would definitely of reached. So you can't just pull a player back like that. I don't think it's a penalty. It's very soft. But it does have me confused a bit, as you're right, he would have reached the ball. So no reason for him to go down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted Saturday at 15:06 Share Posted Saturday at 15:06 I'd keep it the same get a few goals then bring gordon on and will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted Saturday at 15:06 Share Posted Saturday at 15:06 Just now, LiquidAK said: Couldn't understand the co comms bleating on about there being no aggressive intent, as if that matters when he's fouled Murphy in the box Its Enscisco. Should be an auomatic foul and card based on that alone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordshola Posted Saturday at 15:06 Share Posted Saturday at 15:06 1 minute ago, Lenny said: For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty? Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me. Because touching Murphy’s arm causes his legs to just stop working and crash to the ground? He didn’t actually grab him and drag his arm back with any force. I’d be furious if that was given against us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted Saturday at 15:06 Share Posted Saturday at 15:06 4 minutes ago, Aiston said: All the wtf decisions from the ref but it's the +1 minute pissing me off most I know, its like that's the final proof he didn't have a clue, wasn't even a remotely decent guess, the other stuff was at least up for debate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted Saturday at 15:06 Share Posted Saturday at 15:06 Just now, Lordshola said: Because touching Murphy’s arm causes his legs to just stop working and crash to the ground? He didn’t actually grab him and drag his arm back with any force. I’d be furious if that was given against us. Agreed. But evened up the Bruno goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted Saturday at 15:07 Share Posted Saturday at 15:07 Just now, Skeletor said: Its Enscisco. Should be an auomatic foul and card based on that alone. Such a little cunt he even made Miggy mad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiLvOR Posted Saturday at 15:07 Share Posted Saturday at 15:07 1 minute ago, LiquidAK said: Couldn't understand the co comms bleating on about there being no aggressive intent, as if that matters when he's fouled Murphy in the box He does my nut in this bloke on co comms Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted Saturday at 15:07 Share Posted Saturday at 15:07 3 minutes ago, Lenny said: For what reason are people suggesting it wasn't a penalty? Enciso actively tried to stop Murphy illegitimately, by pulling his arm, and was successful in doing so. Seems a stone wall penalty, to me. Yeah I dont get it lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now