Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 19/05/2026 at 16:42, KaKa said:

 

I had a look to see if we'd been linked to any player that could potentially play off the striker, and who is also versatile enough to play as an 8, and that has had a decent return of goals and assists this season.

 

We've been linked with the young Danish player Victor Froholdt at Porto who fits the bill. Mostly played as an 8 at Porto but has played as a 10 for Denmark recently.

 

https://bold.dk/fodbold/klubber/fc-porto/nyheder/froholdt-til-premier-league-tre-topklubber-er-forelsket

 

image.png.18909cb992e80f248a42acb7b8483b76.png

 

 

 

I wanted us to sign him before he went to Porto. He's the perfect Howe player. Absolute machine that never stops running. 

Edit: He's probably to expensive now after being named player of the year in the portuguese league in his first season in Portugal.

 

 

Edited by mosstef

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like him a lot but I would rather we sell. We need someone a lot more mobile to succeed, just don't see it ever working for him here.

 

When we played with Isak up top, the whole team worked well and was more dynamic.  It's a night and day difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Theregulars said:

@LFEE will be gutted 

 

Not at all if it turns out to be the case. Like the lad (not particularly the player from what I’ve seen so far) and want him to do well. Always said to judge him 100% fairly he needs a pre-season with Howe both physically and tactically.

 

However…

 

IF we received a bid big enough this summer so not loosing silly money on him (was never going to be now hence the article but after a potentially great World Cup as Germany’s 3rd striker…) then I would’ve accepted it and either get a better suited 9 for this division or a better suited 10.

 

Only Howe or Bruno leaving would’ve gutted me. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by LFEE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SUPERTOON said:

The article pretty much covers all bases tbf. We will keep him, but will sell if we get a good enough offer. 

I think this is the case for all players tbf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crimson Cardigan said:

Reads like a rebuke to the Twitter incels who go on like it’s been Eddies life work to deliberately ruin Woltemade career.

 

The story doesn't rebuke anything. It doesn't actually say anything at all tbh. If we get a good offer, we'll sell. If not, we keep. Groundbreaking insight.

 

But here's an alternate theory to the season re Woltemade: Eddie has all along been doing the Ted Lasso Jedi mind trick thing, turning Jamie Tartt into a team-first total football player. Setting Woltemade aside, Eddie tanked the season stubbornly clinging to a 4-3-3 that seems to suit absolutely nobody on this roster well. It wasn't just Woltemade, nobody thrived in it. Nick was just the most visible poster child of the overall ineptitude. "I can promise that he won't be 80 metres away from goal with us. If we're playing 80 metres from goal, he won't play." I don't think Eddie was deliberate or malicious, just stubborn.

 

Hoping our last game is the same lineup and 4-2-3-1 as last week. Best we've looked as a team in a long time. We should have been doing this since our three week break.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, DC Magpie said:

 

Eddie tanked the season stubbornly clinging to a 4-3-3 that seems to suit absolutely nobody on this roster well.

 

 

I mean that's demonstrably bollocks isn't it? We've been playing 4-3-3 for years, had success with it and it suited everyone in the squad.

 

We've had a poor season by our own previous standards. But that is down to Woltemade replacing Isak, not because everyone suddenly became unsuited to the formation 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mills and Boon said:

 

I mean that's demonstrably bollocks isn't it? We've been playing 4-3-3 for years, had success with it and it suited everyone in the squad.

 

We've had a poor season by our own previous standards. But that is down to Woltemade replacing Isak, not because everyone suddenly became unsuited to the formation 

 

Well surely there's more to it than that. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mills and Boon said:

It's the main issue we've had.

 

It's certainly not because the rest of the squad suddenly became unsuited to the system we've been playing 

 

Who's at fault for our shocking defence? Is it Wolt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Mills and Boon said:

 

So our most expensive signing was supposed to replace Wilson on the bench?

Aye. He was bought for the future/backup to Wissa/change of gameplan.

 

Howe saved the number 9 (shirt) for Wissa.

 

 

Edited by Hanshithispantz

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fak said:

 

Who's at fault for our shocking defence? Is it Wolt?

 

Our keepers have been shite, but there's been increased pressure on our defence all season because we've not scored as many goals. Holding on to a 2 or 3 goal lead is easier than a 1 goal lead 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...