Jump to content

St James' Park


Delima

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

That isn't true at all.

Do you honestly think we're going to be able to build on Leazes Park without ending up with someone or various organisations seeking a judicial review? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stozo said:

Do you honestly think we're going to be able to build on Leazes Park without ending up with someone or various organisations seeking a judicial review? 

Dawn Howe (aka the new Dolly Potter) will be outside the Bridges every Saturday collecting signatures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pancrate1892 said:

Sad to say, but a new stadium elsewhere is probably not for us, it's for the next generation who probably couldn't give a fuck about sentiment. Like what most of us probably feel about Heaton junction at chillingham road.

I must admit, I rather sit in the town in a bar and watch the match rather than gan to some shite on the outskirts, but I understand that's not everyone's opinion. 

PIF won’t pay twice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do fans have a say so ? A casting vote ? A veto ? 

Imagine if the club wants / needs to move but the current fanbase says no and then PIF decide to walk away citing lack of ambition on the fans part ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DiddyLevine said:

Do fans have a say so ? A casting vote ? A veto ? 

Imagine if the club wants / needs to move but the current fanbase says no and then PIF decide to walk away citing lack of ambition on the fans part ? 

No, they won't have a casting vote - the support doesn't own the club

 

If they've worked out our support by this point, they'll know that they'll grumble a bit and do absolutely nothing about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, stozo said:

Do you honestly think we're going to be able to build on Leazes Park without ending up with someone or various organisations seeking a judicial review? 

 

It depends on what is proposed but yes, probably. Who is going to bring a challenge? Do you think the Friends of Leazes Park have a spare £20k+ lying around? I doubt Historic England would either for Grade II park, unless it's complete destruction of the park. And there would also need to actually be a point of law to bring a challenge on, a decision can't just be challenged because someone doesn't agree with it. 

 

 

Edited by Jackie Broon

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=tyneside+life

 

Not a fan but useful for fans outside the region to see what area they’re talking about.

 

Think his conclusion is wrong based on a couple of questions he’s put to Urban Green, but interesting line about the club buying the Sky Offices at Strawberry Place.

 

 

Edited by Whitley mag

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

https://www.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=tyneside+life

 

Not a fan but useful for fans outside the region to see what area they’re talking about.

 

Think his conclusion is wrong based on a couple of questions he’s put to Urban Green, but interesting line about the club buying the Sky Offices at Strawberry Place.

 

 

 

Leazes - sorry, 'Leezers' - Park is nice, and there should be as little encroachment as possible if a proposed ground was to go there.  And the land currently occupied by SJP should be converted to an extension for the park.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

https://www.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=tyneside+life

 

Not a fan but useful for fans outside the region to see what area they’re talking about.

 

Think his conclusion is wrong based on a couple of questions he’s put to Urban Green, but interesting line about the club buying the Sky Offices at Strawberry Place.

 

 

 

Hes a whopper . Bangs on about Leazes Park but most fans if they had a choice would plump for Castle Leazes 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watched that ten min parcel of shite from Eddie Leezers.  Right load of bollocks, the man makes huge leaps from very little.  The idea that a replacement area +10% would be impossible to find etc.  Total shite.  Besides, if the club were to build on Castle Leazes, it wouldn't require the entire demolition of the existing park - Eddie Leezers seems to think it'll be plonked right in the middle of the lake ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DiddyLevine said:

Hes a whopper . Bangs on about Leazes Park but most fans if they had a choice would plump for Castle Leazes 

100% - I'd say he's strawmanning, but he's not that smart.  He takes a bunch of assumptions and guesses and makes confident statements - just look at his replies to comments under that video.  He doesn't understand construction or council planning whatsoever.  Why would NUFC approach Urban Green - and even if they did, why would the club not issue NDAs?  He thinks that if Eddie Leezers comes knocking, they'll have to give up the facts.  The man's ego is unreal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just guessing here and I have no idea about it, but is there any kind of connection between the decision to push the stadium decision to early 2025 while waiting for the result of the Man City 115 case? Again, I have zero if there are any connections or sense to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nufcjb said:

I am just guessing here and I have no idea about it, but is there any kind of connection between the decision to push the stadium decision to early 2025 while waiting for the result of the Man City 115 case? Again, I have zero if there are any connections or sense to it.

No, I don’t think so. That matter has nothing to do with our stadium plans. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

Think his conclusion is wrong based on a couple of questions he’s put to Urban Green,

They don't own anything so he'd be asking the wrong people.

they just lease the parks and might not have the leases much longer

 

Quote

Newcastle City Council mounted a £50,000 review into its future to determine whether UGN could continue operating or if the parks should be managed another way, for example with control returning to the council itself.



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3d9717ee0yo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...