Jump to content

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, trx345 said:

I don'r trust a new stadium move.

 

New ground will be like Evetons, and West Hams.

 

15 pound burgers, and 30k  just want St James Park.


Since you’re able to predict the future with such absolute accuracy can you tell me which nag is gonna win the 14.40 at Kempton today and I’ll whack my life savings down on it.

 

Thanks in advance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, trx345 said:

I don'r trust a new stadium move.

 

New ground will be like Evetons, and West Hams.

 

15 pound burgers, and 30k  just want St James Park.

How will they be like Everton’s or West Ham’s?

West Han had owners who were happy to take an athletics stadium in place of a football stadium so long as they got it on the cheap.

Everton's stadium when it was planned was designed not to take on the elite clubs, but to make Everton the best of the feast in terms of attendance, and revenue, and get the away from a stadium that they couldn’t feasibly expand and had features such as wooden seats, and support columns in front of seats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dOEsN’t mATtER wHaT tHEy bUiLD oR wHeRE tHeY bUILD iT, iT’LL bE sHIte cOs I’vE aLrEadY dEciDEd iT’LL bE sHItE cOs Ah KnAa iT’LL bE sHitE, cOs Ah KnAa

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

There's far more evidence in favour of his argument than against, tbf.


There’s zero evidence in relation to NUFC because we have zero information on their plans.

 

So to say any new stadium would definitely be shite, or alternatively that it’ll definitely be ace shows that the person is making that statement subjectively not objectively which in turn suggests that the person isn’t someone with a balanced or well thought out opinion. 
 

West Ham fans don’t like their new stadium, cogito ergo sum, if we get a new stadium that we currently have no information about, it’ll be shite. That’s just ridiculous. 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Fair enough. I'd go with 'probably'. Evidence (you'll like this, Bobby): everything about modern football.


And I agree about that. Modern football is corporatised wank, so a modern football stadium might well corporatised wank.
 

But at the moment we know nowt so it’s absolutely pointless making your mind up and saying you know exactly how it’ll be.

 

I prefer to cross the river when I come to it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Bobbydazzla talking at length about something that's expected and not tangeable eh.

 

NONCE 

 

 

 


My points are all about focusing on the tangible not the expected, you wanksplat :lol:

 

We haven’t seen any stadium plans, so people can’t pass judgement on what a new stadium would be like, because the plans for that stadium don’t exist. They’re not tangible. 
 

And you can’t say a hypothetical NUFC stadium will be shite, just because West Ham have a shite stadium. 
 

What you could say is “If we have a stadium designed like West Ham’s, I think it’d probably be shite for the same reasons their fans say theirs is shite”


 

 

 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an outsider I don’t understand people who want to move from St James Park, at the moment it’s a little bit lopsided but this could be rectified by extending round the Gallowgate so it’s the same as the Milburn and Leazes and then adding one smaller single tier to the east stand joining the roofs.


I believe there’s enough room behind the east stand for one single tier only problem being the right to light issue for the listed buildings behind, but if bought by PIF I think there already owned by a Saudi company the right to light issue would no longer be a problem . Capacity 65000- 70000 ?


The buildings behind could then be used for various purposes by the club, offices accommodation, bar’s maybe a club museum
The cost, I’m sure it will be less than 1 billion, I’ll be surprised if it was more than 500 million but a lot less than the 2 billion plus being quoted for a new stadium !

 

 

Edited by andy67

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:


My points are all about focusing on the tangible not the expected, you wanksplat :lol:

 

We haven’t seen any stadium plans, so people can’t pass judgement on what a new stadium would be like, because the plans for that stadium don’t exist. They’re not tangible. 
 

And you can’t say a hypothetical NUFC stadium will be shite, just because West Ham have a shite stadium. 
 

What you could say is “If we have a stadium designed like West Ham’s, I think it’d probably be shite for the same reasons their fans say theirs is shite”

 

Stop talking about it, it doesn't exist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, andy67 said:

As a outsider I don’t understand people who want to move from St James Park, at the moment it’s a little bit lopsided but this could be rectified by extending round the Gallowgate so it’s the same as the Milburn and Leazes and then adding one smaller single tier to the east stand joining the roofs.
I believe there’s enough room behind the east stand for one single tier only problem being the right to light issue for the listed buildings behind, but if bought by PIF I think there already owned by a Saudi company the right to light issue would no longer be a problem . Capacity 65000- 70000 ?
The buildings behind could then be used for various purposes by the club, offices accommodation, bar’s maybe a club museum
The cost, I’m sure it will be less than 1 billion, I’ll be surprised if it was more than 500 million but a lot less than the 2 billion plus being quoted for a new stadium.


Allegedly a Gallowgate extension is an option they’re looking at, but there’s also lots of debate about how difficult it would be to raise the Gallowgate higher

 

Also any extension to the East Stand comes with massive problems for the obvious reasons. Also the East Stand is ancient and needs a full overhaul, it’s from the 70’s. 
 

And the Milburn and Leazers need a proper refresh, they’re 25 years old and showing their age now. 
 

And we’d still have a lopsided stadium. 
 

Hence why a move to something purpose built from scratch is appealing to some people. 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

Stop talking about it, it doesn't exist.


You sound like the voice in my head when I’ve sucked down a 1.5 litre creamer bucket and I can feel myself standing on the precipice of a whitey. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bobbydazzla said:


Allegedly a Gallowgate extension is an option they’re looking at, but there’s also lots of debate about how difficult it would be to raise the Gallowgate higher

 

Also any extension to the East Stand comes with massive problems for the obvious reasons. Also the East Stand is ancient and needs a full overhaul, it’s from the 70’s. 
 

And the Milburn and Leazers need a proper refresh, they’re 25 years old and showing their age now. 
 

And we’d still have a lopsided stadium. 
 

Hence why a move to something purpose built from scratch is appealing to some people. 

 

 

 

I disagree, by extending the Gallowgate they'll have three stands the same, the Lease's and Milburn at present are i believe two tiers higher than the East stand, If the east stand was raised by one tier they could then join all the roofs together giving it a cohesive almost seamless look and a lot less lopsided

 

Regarding the East stand being ancient, I note  Liverpool have expanded three of there stands two recently and pretty sure the main dated back to the 60s or even 50s so don't believe its a insurmountable refurbishment problem 

 

 

Edited by andy67

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must be mental...but I just don't see the attraction of Everton's ground, like most seem to.

Inside it has zero character and all that truss work looks really ugly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GOTONEW said:

I must be mental...but I just don't see the attraction of Everton's ground, like most seem to.

Inside it has zero character and all that truss work looks really ugly.


Loads of them complaining about lack of atmosphere and nightmare queues to get in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, andy67 said:

I disagree, by extending the Gallowgate they'll have three stands the same, the Lease's and Milburn at present are i believe two tiers higher than the East stand, If the east stand was raised by one tier they could then join all the roofs together giving it a cohesive almost seamless look

 

Regarding the East stand being ancient, I note  Liverpool have expanded three of there stands two recently and pretty sure the main dated back to the 60s or even 50s so don't believe its a insurmountable refurbishment problem 


You can disagree all you want but it’d still be lopsided. 

 

3 big stands and a smaller stand. 

 

IMG-7213.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RodneyCisse said:


Loads of them complaining about lack of atmosphere and nightmare queues to get in.

 

Half the ground is surrounded by water, so all fans have to come to it from the other half and work their way round. It's not the best planning. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...