Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...

While looking for the Dyer breaks his leg thread to post that the he was due to return to fitness & play against Ipswich Town it has been reported that he has suffered a new stress fracture to the right leg he badly broke in August last year.

 

 

The article I read it estimated that he has missed 1445 days due to injury/mystery illness.

 

Also read post 2 in this thread, that chaps wish came true.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Selling Dyer was the best business ever.

 

How?

 

:lol:

 

Try and answer it if you like lad.

 

Unless you think he would have still broke his leg if he was here?

 

Of course he wouldn't, but I doubt he'd be a picture of health either. We're well shot of him and his injuries, whatever they may be or however he sustains them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Selling Dyer was the best business ever.

 

How?

 

:lol:

 

Try and answer it if you like lad.

 

Unless you think he would have still broke his leg if he was here?

 

Broken Leg  		   	West Ham United Injuries  	2007 August 28th
Hamstring Injury  	Newcastle United Injuries 	2007 April 10th
Flu  	 	 	 		Newcastle United Injuries 	2007 February 26th
Gashed Leg  	 		Newcastle United Injuries 	2006 November 28th
Eye 	 	  	 		Newcastle United Injuries 	2006 October 29th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2006 April 23rd
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2006 February 23rd
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2005 August 19th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2005 July 18th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2005 April 8th
Groin Strain  		Newcastle United Injuries 	2005 February 16th
Knee Injury   		Newcastle United Injuries 	2005 January 7th
Calf Muscle Strain 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2004 December 21st
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2004 September 20th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2004 September 18th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2004 August 5th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2004 April 9th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2004 March 3rd
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2004 March 3rd
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2003 October 20th
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2003 August 26th
Shin Splints 			Newcastle United Injuries 	2003 May 14th
Shin Splints 			Newcastle United Injuries 	2003 March 31st
Hamstring Injury 	Newcastle United Injuries 	2003 March 13th
Shin Splints 			Newcastle United Injuries 	2003 February 28th
Calf 					Newcastle United Injuries 	2002 December 30th
Back Injury 			Newcastle United Injuries 	2002 October 14th
Shin Splints 			Newcastle United Injuries 	2002 September 3rd 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Selling Dyer was the best business ever.

 

How?

 

:lol:

 

Try and answer it if you like lad.

 

Unless you think he would have still broke his leg if he was here?

 

Of course he wouldn't, but I doubt he'd be a picture of health either. We're well shot of him and his injuries, whatever they may be or however he sustains them.

 

Shame he's better than anything we had last season in midfield, I suppose people miss that point when they say getting rid of him was the best business ever.

 

There were games last season when we were crying out for someone with Dyer's attributes in midfield, someone who can run with the ball, stretch games and get in behind defenders, I'd bet if he was only fit for half of our league games we would still have had more points on the board than with the shite like Milner and Geremi in the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kieron Dyer had one good game every 10 games. Thats not good enough. He got injured a few times every season, always the same recurring injuries. Best bit of buisness weve done to get shot of the little greedy prick.

 

:smitten:

Link to post
Share on other sites

For fuck sake baggio, the way you go on you'd think Dyer only started being injury prone when he went to West Ham..  Of course he wouldn't have had exactly the same problems here, he'd have had different problems, the lads a fucking mess!

 

As much as I liked him as a player (and I can still see his flaws as a player despite that) it was fantastic business to get what we did for him, West Ham got well and truly ripped off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For fuck sake baggio, the way you go on you'd think Dyer only started being injury prone when he went to West Ham..  Of course he wouldn't have had exactly the same problems here, he'd have had different problems, the lads a fucking mess!

 

As much as I liked him as a player (and I can still see his flaws as a player despite that) it was fantastic business to get what we did for him, West Ham got well and truly ripped off.

 

I've said he'd miss games through injury here, but even in the 20 games he'd play a season he would still offer more than Milner, Geremi or that wanker Smith who was brought in to replace him.

 

It'll be good business when I see a better player in his place but until then I won't be jumping for joy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't believe he's 30 in December.

 

waste of a career. Subliminal talent, shame the package was built by indians

 

Who are you? Prince Philip? :lol:

 

subliminal???? without thinking???  i think you meant sublime???

 

and why have a go at indians?? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't believe he's 30 in December.

 

waste of a career. Subliminal talent, shame the package was built by indians

 

Who are you? Prince Philip? :lol:

 

subliminal???? without thinking???  i think you meant sublime???

 

and why have a go at indians?? 

 

meant absolutely no offence whatsoever. Just a joke

Link to post
Share on other sites

For f*** sake baggio, the way you go on you'd think Dyer only started being injury prone when he went to West Ham..  Of course he wouldn't have had exactly the same problems here, he'd have had different problems, the lads a f***ing mess!

 

As much as I liked him as a player (and I can still see his flaws as a player despite that) it was fantastic business to get what we did for him, West Ham got well and truly ripped off.

 

I've said he'd miss games through injury here, but even in the 20 games he'd play a season he would still offer more than Milner, Geremi or that w***** Smith who was brought in to replace him.

 

It'll be good business when I see a better player in his place but until then I won't be jumping for joy.

 

I agree he offered much more then many people give him credit for when fit, but his injury record was shocking and is now even more shocking, which is why I think we did well to sell him.  Of course I also agree that we should have replaced him, instead of buying shit like Smith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...