All Activity

selling it at a sub 10 cap rate I assume on NOI. It’s an event space on a parking lot that otherwise is tied to the football club in Birmingham. No other investment company is buying that for that value. Absolute funny math.

Plus I cannot be arsed with the speculation that its a swap deal plus money for Isak, bore off.

I like Elliot, he's very talented. I just begrudge giving Liverpool money 😂

Coward Get a grip man, it's an online forum to which you contribute relentlessly to a thread about Sunderland.

Very far from the truth wor kid.

Bailey saying we're in for Harvey Elliott.

🚨🚨🚨🚨TORY ALERT 🚨🚨🚨🚨

Going on the dartboard.

21 in dog years would make him about 2 years old.

Stack anyone?

38m for Harvey Barnes was a very good singing. Fin.

They can only do this once and they've played their hand. One day in the next few seasons we might do the same so no point sticking the boot in

We really should be feeling the best about the club we've ever felt, or certainly since the Keegan years. If we are frustrated and annoyed now then we really don't have any chance to enjoy the experience of being a fan. I know the experience of a football fan is basically constant disappointment, wanting more and being annoyed, but it's a bit much sometimes.

Just passing on what I read the other day when looking for info on Villa and PSR, but.... https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/aston-villa-handed-100m-verdict-31948579 It sounds like they've settled on a valuation of closer to 60M, maybe to not ruffle feathers. My quote could still be correct though in that this valuation is based on speculation and not any actual finances of the Aston Villa women's team in 2025. We could of course do this ourselves now two others have done it.

Memories of goldfish on here sadly

(mistake)

I don't agree but fair enough opinion.

Yeah ridiculously good fit I reckon.

This cunt been hijacked by Chelsea yet?

Be an absolutely perfect signing for them

For me a great signing from a price perspective is one that exceeds the expectations from the price we paid. I think Barnes has been on par overall. Which is decent. But it's kind of rare that people rate their own players or signings as "decent". They go from bad to great in a heartbeat. My post was exclusively replying to a comment on why Chelsea are paying more for Pedro. To me that's pretty clear. Whether it works out or not remains to be seen.

Is juice and a sweetie Scots jargon for crystal meth and ketamine? 😆

We don’t have any other assets to sell, it’s our men’s team, a decent training ground, a leasehold position on the stadium and i guess the fee interest in the stack site. Our women’s team is far off. So please stop mentioning our owners aren’t using any loopholes to use because we don’t have anything to move. And the one time we sold a player to Saudi, we were run thru the mud in the press and made to defend why Maxi was a 25m player despite his age and helping us qualify for CL. Meanwhile Dhuran has one good half season and goes for double. finally - I don’t want to use loopholes. I want to do this the right way.

Surely he would start ahead of Martinelli who is a bit of a one trick pony. A front three of Eze - Sesko/Gyokeres - Saka with the rest of the team could win the league. If Arteta spends this much and fails to win anything (again!) then they would surely have to get rid. He has spent a fortune since he took over!