James

There is some fairly credible looking evidence on the Aviation thread that Staveley and Reuben are catching a plane together tomorrow.

Possibly the best time for PL to settle before a CAT ruling as it saves face for them

yes, Heron

I feel there is a need to boycott those who aren’t going to organise a boycott

Huge sign of public interest that which the authorities must note

nothing will happen on Wednesday because the judge goes away to consider their decision which will get published a few weeks later so we won’t hear a thing until then

Anyone seen the ‘too many journalists’ excuse?

Chris Hughton is now available without compo. not great but at least we might play like a group of lads and find a bit of confidence

Don’t have much hope for this game, my only hope is that someone, hopefully Matt Ritchie will make Ronaldo cry

Quote a high level appointment for a role of this level to be honest considering he has won League 1 as a manager

Would the accumulation of stock offset the depreciation of the assets? Market trading has indicated that forecast growth would lead to macroeconomic inflation where the discount rate would effectively demonstrate the present value.

No

There will probably be discussions on timescales and how a delay would impact clubs operations if they are still being impacted on each day by uncompetitive behaviour. so it doesn’t mean we will be heard in 104th position, we will get bumped up. Furthermore the judge could be quite specific on how delay could lead to larger penalties or more severe action being taken which may scare the PL into settling. Might even demand the club retains access to organisations that they are currently involved in - that would mean immunity to relegation.

Just a general point of order but previously naysayers have either said that Mehrdad is a fake Twitter account or if real then he’s detached from the process and doesn’t know anything. But now he posted something negative, that’s it, done? it can’t be both though!

Well the the judges will just have to decide whether things not being disclosed are important enough in their decision making

At some point courts will just base their decisions around non-disclosure = guilt

I don’t think now is the time or place to make personal attacks and rub it into people’s faces douchebag

I’m jus sticking around for what I hope is some true retaliation.

A ‘no’ would have been better for the club than a W A I T The PL are shitting in our face now. If they won’t give transparency then we need to make the media give the PL constant scrutiny and Ashley is going to have to do something drastic to get the media’s attention such as fielding the under 12s against West Ham

Same old delay delay delay tactics the PL will do this until they can’t delay any more. they will once again be banking on us getting relegated whilst the CAT may now be more prominent in the timescales I’m sure they will find a way to delay that too.

to be honest I doubt Amanda would either, imagine if he got DMd!

No, Bramble on his day was very good I would place behind Woodgate and Coloccini only when talking about 21st Century NUFC defenders ability. He did make errors which were catastrophic but they were usually grouped together over a few games where he had just come back from injury and wasn’t really ready to play but the highlights would have only focused on the bad. Closest comparison would be to how Stones had that blip last year. Really his problems were similar to Woodgate - injuries. whereas O’Brien was just mediocre cover who wasn’t expected to play as much as he did.

In an ideal world, I own the club, I have the wealth of Jeff Bezos, and am the words number one male sex symbol

this is what the CAT case is for