-
Posts
12,100 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Teasy
-
I've always thought he was a very good left back and a potentially class player for the future. I'll be very annoyed if he's sold. Lets put the Jose Enrique songs into overdrive in future to let the management know that we want him to stay.
-
IMO he was THAT bad. While he was here I had zero confidence of us beating anybody, plus we played a 'style' of Football that was nothing short of painful to watch. He's the only manager ever to make me not look forward to watching the match! Don't agree for a second that he was a victim of anything either, apart from his own ignorance maybe.
-
The Newcastle United Transfer Thread: D-Day [Spoiler: Not Much Happens]
Teasy replied to LooneyToonArmy's topic in Football
As I remember it he wasn't able to adapt to the premier league at all, and that was a few years ago. Great player, but not for us I think. He played 64 games for Chelsea and scored a goal every 2.66 games (24 goals). No matter what other problems he may have had at Chelsea that's a pretty excellent goal scoring record. That many? I didn't think he'd played half of that to be honest.. completely forgot about his wife losing the baby aswell. You probably just forgot his second spell at Chelsea? He played 31 games for Chelsea in the 2003-2004 season and scored 12 goals. He left on loan to AC Milan for the 2004-2005 season. But then came back in 2005-2006 and played 33 games scoring 12 goals. -
that shows what happens when you look at the world through statoculars Even stats don't back that up to be honest.
-
Didn't you predict he'd be fantastic here as well?
-
The Newcastle United Transfer Thread: D-Day [Spoiler: Not Much Happens]
Teasy replied to LooneyToonArmy's topic in Football
As I remember it he wasn't able to adapt to the premier league at all, and that was a few years ago. Great player, but not for us I think. He played 64 games for Chelsea and scored a goal every 2.66 games (24 goals). No matter what other problems he may have had at Chelsea that's a pretty excellent goal scoring record. -
Then again, how many players have been given a £100+k contract at 25, and then still offered £90k aged 29? Will Owen see it that way though? Do you think he'll consider himself lucky to get that offer in what he (and others) will consider the peak of his career? To be fair to Owen he's a world class striker and not a player you can honestly ategorically doesnt warrant a £100k wage in the first place, it'd be a massive thing for him to be takng a pay cut whilst players like Lampard and Terry are getting a pay rise AND longer contracts offers at older ages. How do you think that will bode for him? People get salary increases because other clubs will pay them that amount, Owen started on a wage far more then anyone else were willing to or even could pay. He's a world class striker IMO that would be worth £100,000 a week if he wasn't injury prone he's not stupid so he'll realise that has to be taken into account. Remember, we're not just talking anout £90,000 a week, more then anyone else will pay IMO, we're talking about a 4 year contract which means he'll still be on £90,000 when he's 33. For a player with such major injury problems that's an incredible deal. If he doesn't see it that way then I hope we don't offer him a penny more. I think theres a of a prestige issue here more than a monetary one. Lampard is a prime example of that. The injury record is a moot point ot be honest Mark Viduka being a prime example of that as well. Its not a moot point at all, had Viduka not been such a cripple we'd have had a much harder time signing him given his quality at the time. Both prestige and money come into it, but Owen's not going to accept a much lower wage from the likes of Everton, Spuds, Villa or Wigan for prestige reasons The top 4 won't want him either. Man City might be his only option, simply because they could offer him the same deal or better. Will they?, probably not IMO.
-
Fucking hell!
-
Do you really think Allardyce is the kind of manager who can come into a club in trouble and adapt himself quickly to the players he has to keep them up though? He was good with Bolton given years to find the right players for his style but he showed here that he can't adapt at all. He can only play one way and if the players don't fit his style they're fucked.
-
Which results? Even early on we weren't doing particularly well under Allardyce. I can remember maybe 2 or 3 good results, the rest were average to diabolical. We were unbeaten at home until November, that's pretty good going if you ask me. Infact we had 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats in the premier league. It wasn't until Portsmouth at home that the wheels came off for us really. Like I said, early on we were getting decent results. This is exactly what the press were saying at the time, completely ignoring the fact that we'd had an incredibly easy start to the season. I'm not ignoring the fact that it was an easier start to the season than most, if not every other team. All I'm saying is that for the first few months we were getting results against teams that we'd expect to get results off, with only 1 major blip - that being Derby. It's not like we're the only team to ever lose to a team much worse than our own on paper. My argument was that we were doing good at the start of Allardyce's campaign and it wasn't all terrible results and performances like some people make out. I'm glad he was sacked as I never really wanted him here in the first place, but I'm willing to recognise that for a short amount of time we were getting results and things didn't look all bad. Ok fair enough we did ok in our first 9 or 10 games result wise. But I was never truly happy with the results overall even back then.
-
Based on 1 good game out of about 10 ? Or based on his overall impression of the player in the 30+ games he's played for us? Or have you only seen the last 10 games?
-
Which results? Even early on we weren't doing particularly well under Allardyce. I can remember maybe 2 or 3 good results, the rest were average to diabolical. We were unbeaten at home until November, that's pretty good going if you ask me. Infact we had 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats in the premier league. It wasn't until Portsmouth at home that the wheels came off for us really. Like I said, early on we were getting decent results. This is exactly what the press were saying at the time, problem is it ignored the fact that we'd had an incredibly easy start to the season.
-
Which results? We beat bolton away Wow, they were utterly s*** though. Bolton away, West Ham, Everton & Spurs at home, Arsenal at home, Fulham away. Fulham wasn't early on and neither was Arsenal but I'll forget about that. Six good results, some of them like Bolton and Fulham only borderline considering how shit those teams were at the time. Not really much to shout about in 24 or so games. What I was actually talking about by the way is the idea that Allardyce did well early on with us, he didn't, we just had very easy fixtures to start the season
-
Which results? We beat bolton away I suppose any away win is a good result but we should remember that Bolton were incredibly shit early in the season. They went on to get 5 points from there first 10 games.
-
Which results? Even early on we weren't doing particularly well under Allardyce. I can remember maybe 2 or 3 good results, the rest were average to diabolical.
-
That normally happens because the other clubs are willing to pay those higher salaries though, this is a unique issue due to his age and the monstrous amount of money we're supposedly paying him already. Can you envisage a situation where Owen will be on the free transfer list with no teams going near him becaseu of his wage? How often does the oppurtunity to sign a 1 in 2 striker come about? In todays game £100k isnt a unique thing, even Sol Campbell is on £90k... Correction, he's a one in two striker who's played just over 50 games in three and a half seasons.
-
Then again, how many players have been given a £100+k contract at 25, and then still offered £90k aged 29? Will Owen see it that way though? Do you think he'll consider himself lucky to get that offer in what he (and others) will consider the peak of his career? To be fair to Owen he's a world class striker and not a player you can honestly ategorically doesnt warrant a £100k wage in the first place, it'd be a massive thing for him to be takng a pay cut whilst players like Lampard and Terry are getting a pay rise AND longer contracts offers at older ages. How do you think that will bode for him? People get salary increases because other clubs will pay them that amount, Owen started on a wage far more then anyone else were willing to or even could pay. He's a world class striker IMO that would be worth £100,000 a week if he wasn't injury prone he's not stupid so he'll realise that has to be taken into account. Remember, we're not just talking anout £90,000 a week, more then anyone else will pay IMO, we're talking about a 4 year contract which means he'll still be on £90,000 when he's 33. For a player with such major injury problems that's an incredible deal. If he doesn't see it that way then I hope we don't offer him a penny more.
-
David Craig "The Blackburn fans will look at his ability to get the best out of players" Then they'll all slash their wrists in unison
-
He doesn't foot the bill anyway. However you might be right in a round about way. He might only be making the offer because Newcastle United with Owen is a more attractive asset then Newcastle United without Owen. If he was staying then perhaps he'd be more interested in cutting the wage bill then keeping the value of the club as high as possible.
-
WTF? i think wiki telling the truth... You're joking yes?
-
Yeah but his situation is different as well. He's 29 now, not 25 and a £90,000 a week contract taking him up to his 33rd birthday is an absolutely amazing offer.
-
No chance IMO, though they might offer him an absolutely huge signing on fee and £50,000 a week.
-
Yeah that's exactly what he said Ozzie, well done for reading and comprehending his point so very well
-
He obviously hasn't heard the excuse that it's supposed to be about Richard Reid. Or he was advised that the court would be to pig ignorant to realise that taking the piss out of someone for looking like someone else isn't actually racist. Much better to steer clear of the whole mine field and just go with an absolutely absurd excuse that can't possibly be construed as racism by narrow minded idiots.
-
Its a bit silly how some people's opinions of Viduka have dipped so low since his last injury. People seem to be judging him on a few sub apearances while he's still not match fit.