Colos Short and Curlies

Or will he wait for the summer to decide where potentially Spurs Man City Liverpool Chelsea Could all be looking for a new manager (reckon there is a fair chance Pep and Klopp walk after this season)

Luke's made Mediawatch https://www.football365.com/news/mediawatch-leeds-supporters-never-let-marsch-succeed-blind-bielsa

I have a feeling a team will win 15 of the remaining 17/18 games. whether it’s one of the current top 4, spurs Liverpool or Chelsea I don’t know but one will

He missed 80 league games for us over 10 years and around 25 for Blackburn over his four years there. Even in allowing for half of these to have been missed at his scoring rate its knocked 25 goals off his total. After taking off the years with his loan spells I reckon Kane has missed 40 games for spurs so 13 goals. Wasn't what I expected to find - I was trying to show that without injuries Shearer would be miles further ahead but the reality is that they are really similar in profiles We should really sign Kane in the summer just to have 3 of the top 4 Premier League goal scorers associated with us

And the other 3 being Leeds, Palace, Palace. You're doing alreet, we're doing alreet, Arsenal are doing alreet etc but no team is on exceptional form since the restart, a big bunch of much of a muchness on 10-12 points since the restart

Of course!

aren’t they 2 wins in 5 in the league? Their good form is really in the cups

Who is our game in hand against? Tried scrolling the BBC fixtures but couldn’t spot where we play but Man U and Spurs dont

If VAR look at it then the argument that it hasn't been seen by the ref goes out of the window. If VAR cannot look at it (outside the area) then surely this argument doesn't exist?

We'd be up against Arsenal and Liverpool for Rice you would imagine. Advantage over Arsenal is that he is pretty much nailed on as a starter here with a little more competition there so they may not value him quite as high as we do Advantage over Liverpool is that they are going to tie themselves in knots with Bellingham so we can nip in quickly

Will that be Hexham's finest Fraser Forster playing in the Champions League knock out stages?

Looks real bad in isolation but there is a lot of missing context e.g. are these cash advances on sponsorship deals (rather than taking a loan on future income from the bank) e.g. how were these payments disclosed when all said and done - nothing wrong with taking in shareholder equity, up to the PL how they interpret their treatment e.g. do the intermediary sponsors actually do anything or are they just shell companies used to distribute cash? This was early on in the City project so I would assume getting cash through the door today was more important than over a 3-5 year sponsorship period, on the premise that Champions League funding would soon kick in to fill the cash gap, probably not quite the smoking gun that it immediately looks to be

But if you take the issue of Manchini's (alleged) contract position there is nothing legally wrong with what was in place, it is a question on whether it contravened the rules put in place by a sporting body. Same with sponsorship values, legally they are likely to be sound but whether they fit the PLs requirements is a different kettle of fish. If Chelsea are using a 7 year contract to spread fees and it is found to be a 5 year contract with the option of 2 (based on hitting criteria) then we'll see another legal wrangling on whether the initial contract is 5 or 7. All good fun from the sidelines

Nah, we've got Liverpool at home next, that's the easiest game in the premier league at the moment. Plus wouldn't surprise me if Klopp walks should they lose to Everton

Undecided if this is a terrible joke or the best joke ever told on this forum. Could be both of course

UEFA did do something though, they saw a legal loophole being exploited and closed it from the next transfer window

He quits, cites it being a massive distraction, moves to PSG (or similar) and he is merely a forgotten footnote in why City didn't win the league this season and is totally distanced from any ruling when it happens.

Reckon we’ll go £200m-£250m in the summer but that will be partly funded through Maxi and Dubs leaving along with a bit of padding from the likes of our dear captain, Manquillo and one or 2 more. wouldn’t be a total shock if Wilson went back to Bournemouth or similar for £20-£25m with a younger player brought in. I’d add that to the £250m if that happened.

not under Howe. He’ll be impressing on them the importance of form and momentum going into the final, you can’t switch off for 3 games, even just 10-15% then switch it back on for the final. I reckon we will start like a train today, the plan will be 2-3 nil by half time then kill the game dead. bournemouth will be similar liverpool will be a send off like no other as we break the premier league record for winning margin and goals scored by a single player in a game

So much you added 20 years to the date

3 subs, the way it should still be

Yes you can. It then becomes a Civil/Contract point where the burden is much lower than for a criminal court. The tape in itself can easily be used to created a case of serious misconduct bringing the club into disrepute. It could get messy with lawyers but you'd have a good case of winning any tribunal if it got to that

I'm sure Howe always had belief that he'd make it to the top but good ol Jase must think he's on the lottery being up here now

More likely to be W,D,W. We're fucking smashing Liverpool on the send off game

Lascelles for the send off, lets be honest he is off in the summer. Miggy because he deserves it for stepping up this season in a big way output wise. Wilson as it just kind of feels right for the number 9 to get it Murphy for the wind up