Lenny

Getting beaten 2-0 away from home by a better team and mananger isn't exactly unimaginable. Infact, I'd have AZ as slight favourites. i think we are a better team to be honest, its just that most of our players underperform can't believe that is up for debate tbh I disagree completely. We have a very poor 'team' and if it wasn't for the quality of our individual players, we'd be in a relegation battle. i think we have a better team of players performing below their abilities whereas they have worse players playing to their ability.

Getting beaten 2-0 away from home by a better team and mananger isn't exactly unimaginable. Infact, I'd have AZ as slight favourites. i think we are a better team to be honest, its just that most of our players underperform can't believe that is up for debate tbh im probably being stupid here but does that mean you agree with me or think im talkin shit

Getting beaten 2-0 away from home by a better team and mananger isn't exactly unimaginable. Infact, I'd have AZ as slight favourites. i think we are a better team to be honest, its just that most of our players underperform

i love the passion! i would love it if we won the cup...

please be joking, what did he do wrong? What did he do right? Didn't attack well and watched his marker far too much. Definately think we will score out there, they seem s*** scared of our pace. Start with the Zog next game mind. i think you are critisizing him because of who he is. He had a steady game, did his job.

please be joking, what did he do wrong?

My Ratings: Given: 8 - Made some good saves, unlucky with the pen Carr: 7 - Did his job no more no less Solano: 8 - Good vision/passing, composed at the back Bramble: 9 - Superb game, excellent tackle to stop the attacker clean through Taylor: 7.5 - Lots of good interceptions. unlucky with the penalty Duff: 7 - Very good first half, good skill for the first goal, tired 2nd half Dyer: 8 - Lots of running, took his goal superbly, looked shattered as usual in the last 20 Parker: 8 - Usual commitment made some excellent tackles such as the one that led to Dyers goal Butt: 8 - Steady performance in the middle. Battled well Sibierski: 8 - Link up play in the first half was superb, good contribution Martins: 9.5 - Loses 0.5 for missing the chance to make his hat trick. Superb game, took his goals brilliantly, good tricks, vision - MOM. Subs: Milner: 6 - Didnt get involved, stuck a good cross in Emre: 6.5 - Couple of good runs, lost the ball a couple of times Roeder: 8 - I was personally quite happy with his line up before the game, shoved Van Gaal's comments about them being superior in the attacking sense down his throat. Second leg obviously open though.

got to disagree ref had a great game i thought the ref had a pretty poor game tbh, he let the game flow but made/did not make some telling decisions! ref had an outstanding game imo. pen was a bit harsh but it did hit taylors arm did it not? yeah it did hit his arm, it was harsh but it was a pen, but i just think overall although he let the game flow he made some poor decisions. our players were just pushed off the ball and the play continued quite a few times.

what was wrong with the line up? there was balance in the team apart from carr starting at left back, i was quite happy with the team.

that tackle was amazing, as was parkers from the pen!

got to disagree ref had a great game i thought the ref had a pretty poor game tbh, he let the game flow but made/did not make some telling decisions!

Common knowledge he prefers the centre. I thought he did well there, linking up well with Solano as usual and got forward well. Brilliant finish for his goal too. i was actually joking, but yeah i thought he played well there as well!

anybody see what dyer just said? i didnt know he didnt like playing right mid...

was a shame they scored from the pen, parkers tackle was immense!

I'm glad a lot of people are actually acknowledging how much we have missed emre!

i hate diouf more than any player by far!what a cunt!

yeah i agree with that but i cant imagine the fluidity between players is going to be too good when our line up is changing all the time.

i dont think he has played well there for us but i think his strength is improving and could possibly end up playing there

i think a lot of people would have agreed with you at the time though!

Luque why not? Cos he's useless, lacks commitment, has no impact in games. Woodgate/Pogatez and we play Luque, you are having a laugh haha thought that would get a response. tbh i think Sib has served his purpose and i want to see Dyer in cm with Parker as a propper dm so there isnt really anyone else that can go upfront.... Carroll then!!!

is Zoggy fit to start now??

Given Taylor Bramble Gooch Babayaro Milner Parker Dyer Duff Martins Luque (fuck it why not)

We need Dr Spectrum to post that picture up again man of him on Footy Focus. Glad to see a Southerner using the word Charva as well. I live in broadstairs in south east kent and have found myself using the word charvas cos of this site!!! "Until recently, chav was a word that had largely been confined to the southern reaches of the British isles and in the bitchiest of newspaper columns and websites." Dent has traced the current origins of chav to Popbitch, but there are a number of different theories about how it came about. The word expert Michael Quinion, a fieldworker for the Oxford English Dictionary, who runs his own website, World Wide Words, believes chav has existed as far back as the middle of the 19th century. "When it came into common usage recently, it was associated with Medway towns, such as Rochester and Chatham, but it is not a term particular to that area," Mr Quinion said. "It is also known in Oxford and in much of southern England as a derogatory term. The evidence is that this word has been lurking around in the language for a long time. "It has almost certainly come from the Romany word for a child, chavi, recorded from the middle of the 19th century as a slang term. What is not known is whether it has dropped out of the language altogether, but that would be unusual. The implication is that the word has never quite gone away." So why is it good to see a southerner use the word Chav. We have been calling Chavs chavs for years. No fucker likes them no matter where they come from, north or south. As for picking up the word chav from this site Markluk where have you been locked away for the last 5 years? charva not chav u mong, as BottledDog said! So you started adding an A on the end because of this forum ? Am I missing something ? Is a Chav and Charva not the same thing ? So your saying your easily influenced ? Yet you call me a mong for mis-understanding ? Mate, people where i live say Chav, yet have found myself saying charva because i have read it on this forum, it was just a bloody pointless comment why are you making a big deal of it! Because i`m at work bored. I thought you were implying that Chav was new to you and the south, obviously not knowing you were stating that you now add a couple of letters for the sake of it. Here down south only the snobs say Char-va in a queens english type of way. I`m not making a big deal of it, i`m passing away the time. Didn`t apreciate being called a mong though, luckily I havn`t got Downs Syndrome so its not too insulting. you clearly must be really bored! ok il change "mong" to "stupid" then for not reading it correctly!

We need Dr Spectrum to post that picture up again man of him on Footy Focus. Glad to see a Southerner using the word Charva as well. I live in broadstairs in south east kent and have found myself using the word charvas cos of this site!!! "Until recently, chav was a word that had largely been confined to the southern reaches of the British isles and in the bitchiest of newspaper columns and websites." Dent has traced the current origins of chav to Popbitch, but there are a number of different theories about how it came about. The word expert Michael Quinion, a fieldworker for the Oxford English Dictionary, who runs his own website, World Wide Words, believes chav has existed as far back as the middle of the 19th century. "When it came into common usage recently, it was associated with Medway towns, such as Rochester and Chatham, but it is not a term particular to that area," Mr Quinion said. "It is also known in Oxford and in much of southern England as a derogatory term. The evidence is that this word has been lurking around in the language for a long time. "It has almost certainly come from the Romany word for a child, chavi, recorded from the middle of the 19th century as a slang term. What is not known is whether it has dropped out of the language altogether, but that would be unusual. The implication is that the word has never quite gone away." So why is it good to see a southerner use the word Chav. We have been calling Chavs chavs for years. No fucker likes them no matter where they come from, north or south. As for picking up the word chav from this site Markluk where have you been locked away for the last 5 years? charva not chav u mong, as BottledDog said! So you started adding an A on the end because of this forum ? Am I missing something ? Is a Chav and Charva not the same thing ? So your saying your easily influenced ? Yet you call me a mong for mis-understanding ? Mate, people where i live say Chav, yet have found myself saying charva because i have read it on this forum, it was just a bloody pointless comment why are you making a big deal of it!

We need Dr Spectrum to post that picture up again man of him on Footy Focus. Glad to see a Southerner using the word Charva as well. I live in broadstairs in south east kent and have found myself using the word charvas cos of this site!!! "Until recently, chav was a word that had largely been confined to the southern reaches of the British isles and in the bitchiest of newspaper columns and websites." Dent has traced the current origins of chav to Popbitch, but there are a number of different theories about how it came about. The word expert Michael Quinion, a fieldworker for the Oxford English Dictionary, who runs his own website, World Wide Words, believes chav has existed as far back as the middle of the 19th century. "When it came into common usage recently, it was associated with Medway towns, such as Rochester and Chatham, but it is not a term particular to that area," Mr Quinion said. "It is also known in Oxford and in much of southern England as a derogatory term. The evidence is that this word has been lurking around in the language for a long time. "It has almost certainly come from the Romany word for a child, chavi, recorded from the middle of the 19th century as a slang term. What is not known is whether it has dropped out of the language altogether, but that would be unusual. The implication is that the word has never quite gone away." So why is it good to see a southerner use the word Chav. We have been calling Chavs chavs for years. No fucker likes them no matter where they come from, north or south. As for picking up the word chav from this site Markluk where have you been locked away for the last 5 years? charva not chav u mong, as BottledDog said!