huss9

havent seen anyhighlights of it but was his lunge a red?

so hard to get the ball off him. really helped see out the win.

eddie doesnt think he's ready to start yet. he needs 90 minutes alongside schar to get him used to our back 4 and "system". home cup game is ideal. he may turn out to be a better option than burn. we'll never know.

pace.

how is this allowed?

if we do, it will be through a cup and not the league.

they twisted what eddie said in his presser on friday. we have to be careful with contract extensions as it affects psr.

to think we had £70m to spend in the summer.

he really is shite, consistently.

time to pull ya fucking fingers oot. get some money in and get it spent.

easy to say when your season's going the way it is. we havent had the most difficult of opening fixtures.

need to go full strength in the cup. maybe kelly in for burn.

absolutely right. blame shared between eddie , the players, and the owners. still dont believe why we havent had a little more creative accounting upstairs like chelsea and citeh.

fine when defending as just needs to clear it. he's shit when having to direct them. think he mentioned when he fist signed that he needed to improve his attacking headers and get more goals. he's failed.

always has his hands all over the opponent - in both boxes.

canny game today. needs better in front and inside him.

selling gazza, waddle, beardsley killed me off in the 80's. this one doesnt come close. even Carroll going felt worse.

break out the relegationometer.

we were all incredulous and overjoyed that someone actually bought him AND gave us a decent fee,.

whats the deal with him and villa's kit?

he also hesitated slightly and said some of it was true.

how long after the takeover didit start/finish?

i've seen boro, wimbledon, norwich, wigan, oxford, luton, sheff wed, swansea, birmingham all win fucking trophies. ridiculous.

Man City fans aim unsubtle dig at Premier League CEO Richard Masters as legal war rumbles on... amid 'feisty' emergency meeting between top flight clubs over sponsorship rules An emergency meeting between club officials was held on Tuesday afternoon This came amid an ongoing legal war between Man City and the Premier League Manchester City fans planted a giant screen outside the Premier League’s HQ claiming that the competition’s chief executive is being controlled by some of their Big Six rivals - as the civil war between the pair rumbled on. An emergency summit was held on Tuesday afternoon to try and find peace in City’s battle with the top-flight over sponsorship rules. However, execs from across the top flight had to walk past a flatbed truck which featured an LED board showing the badges of Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United and Spurs with the caption ‘Richard’s Masters’ – a not-so thinly-veiled dig at Premier League boss Richard Masters. The van was parked on North Wharf Road in Paddington close to the entrance of the building where clubs attempted to thrash out next steps in what was described as a ‘feisty’ meeting where no timeline was given on a resolution to the sponsorship rules row. The group claiming responsibility, called The OSC, posted a picture of the elaborate protest, along with the caption: ‘A message to the Premier League from those of us outside the cartel. Stop governing on behalf of them and represent the league fairly and evenly. City, Everton, Forest, Newcastle, Chelsea, West Ham, Newcastle – who is next?’ Premier League CEO Masters (pictured) wants the matter dealt with 'swiftly and effectively' but there are now fears it could drag into 2025 Earlier this month a tribunal ruled that regulations over commercial deals with companies linked to owners of top-flight sides were ‘unlawful’ – after a challenge from City. Insiders have disclosed that the Premier League attempted to stick to their guns in the summit after chief executive Masters told clubs in the aftermath of the hearing that they could make the necessary amendments ‘quickly and effectively’. Read More Inside the week that blew up the Premier League: How Man City's legal war has forced clubs split However, City’s legal counsel Simon Cliff – who responded to Masters’ summary by emailing all clubs to emphatically dismiss that notion – again pointed out that there could be no swift solution. Views were sought from those present, with one source describing exchanges as ‘feisty’. Each club had two representatives. Some attended in person while others dialled in. At one stage, according to insiders, the Premier League representatives complained about the volume of work which would be required. Clubs were told that their feedback would eventually be presented to those working on a solution to the three issues identified with the associated party transaction (APT) rules, including the need to include shareholder loans within the amended system. No date for a vote, which would be needed to bring in changes, was given. Instead, clubs were told that they would be issued with an update in due course. The meeting was scheduled for two hours but only lasted for around a half of that. In special circumstances a vote can be rushed through, should the clubs be in agreement. However, normal practice is for a 21-day period of reflection after proposals are put forward before a vote is taken. Some believe what is a damaging episode for the top flight may now drag into the new year. Meanwhile, the Premier League’s legal battle with City over their alleged 115 breaches of financial regulations, which is not connected to the above, continues.

red really suits him.