Jump to content

mrmojorisin75

Member
  • Posts

    53,525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mrmojorisin75

  1. Agree agree with this, football is much better overall since 5th but his mentality is the same once the team goes ahead - that basically hasn't changed since 5th and the flirt with relegation...he's got to get a handle on that like it's madness and solely, entirely of his own making this lucky to have in form strikers is utter horseshit, you can't blame him for some things and then take away the positives because it suits you....by that token every single facet of everything he succeeds at can be considered luck if you so choose - again though, on the flipside he deserves criticism for cisse's descent into being a horror story 'cause it looks like he's completely give up on the lad (always possible the sponsorship thing in the summer has fucked with his mind i guess)
  2. see i could probably live with what he does, if he was any good at it, but he's terrible and we're always hanging on to scrape the win if he had some quality tactical masterplan and we just shut games down professionally and coasted to the 2-0 then i could see the logic, but it's nothing like that it's just so shit
  3. Yes indeed. We don't need steel and brute force against Norwich, we need to control the game, dictate play and comfortably win by 2 goals. Anita is the type of player that should be knitting this together in their half. he'll not start like
  4. someone gets it then, great to see a person who doesn't think we should play to our strengths of kicking it and running fast as the way to a better future
  5. Son? Bonkers how little some people know about football.
  6. ronaldo will win it now 'cause he's hit form at the right time, there's traction for him in the press, and messi is perceived to be having a dip in form due to injury problems nowt else needs saying on the matter tbh
  7. was inferring the same thing when discussing townsend, but got slated for it
  8. is it still hong-myeong bo or whatever? CH from the 2002 WC
  9. yeah, but the club own the land and would thus be held ultimately responsible for the injuries to all the pissheads and kids crippling themselves on matchdays
  10. club do something right for a change and get slated for it anyway
  11. Jeez of course he will have less of an impact if the goals dry up...stating the obvious there! i'm fucking out, this is clearly a wind up (which is succeeding)
  12. i can't everything needs to be explained down to the tiniest degree, it's killing me
  13. i did say that, but that's not what TCD was even referring to brett...i'll rephrase for then; "you get the feeling if the goals dry up he'll have much less of an impact overall"...i certainly do, i do not feel this with messi whatsover better? fucking hate having to spell things out like that, jesus, what did you think i meant that if he had a bad scoring run that'd be ronaldo on the scrapheap and sacked? make the leap man
  14. this sums up why messi has beat ronaldo so often for the awards tbh, ronaldo is a goal machine but you get the feeling if the goals dry up he's done for, with messi you know if he isn't scoring goals he's got the ability to dictate games at the very highest level I would say a lot of people under-rate Christiano. And the quoted is BS based on mystique. During his reign as the best in the world, Messi has been the difference, the goal machine. Dictating games while Busquets, Xavi and Iniesta have been playing? Nah. People say things like that based on little evidence that they've seen from their own eyes. can you fucking read?
  15. http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/pete-jenson-whos-the-daddy-now-cristiano-ronaldo-has-surely-seized-the-ballon-dor-from-lionel-messi-8952907.html
  16. this sums up why messi has beat ronaldo so often for the awards tbh, ronaldo is a goal machine but you get the feeling if the goals dry up he's done for, with messi you know if he isn't scoring goals he's got the ability to dictate games at the very highest level
  17. if this is in direct response to what had gone immediately before i'd like to know where anyone, including me, has said anything different to what you've highlighted in bold? this was the post that started me off as it was following on people discussing townsend: the point isn’t that townsend is the problem, that he's not finished article or a world beater or whatever, the bit in bold is the fucking problem and townsend is a part of it as a whole - i offered my own opinion as to why his style is easier to nullify especially at international level and i stand by it, that's not to say he can't change or adapt, i hope he does insanity this needs spelling out to such a degree
×
×
  • Create New...