mrmojorisin75

who are the 20? jesus

you heard him on the radio? hes shitting himself and generally making a right tit of himself http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7950507.stm cringe-tastic at what stage of the insanity process do you realise you're insane? i'm guessing it's not long after you're sitting ridiculing another teams manager in march 2009 as a newcastle supporter What? read

que? 11 good players

But you need to have a good brain, good distribution and have very good decision making abilities. All of which he doesn't have. Plus I don't think he'd have the discipline for such a role. any chance playing under a good manager above the age of 19 might have had an effect on the lad? vs playing under fucking managerial car crashes and with players who should be scraping barnacles of the end of my cock? none? fair enough

you heard him on the radio? hes shitting himself and generally making a right tit of himself http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7950507.stm cringe-tastic at what stage of the insanity process do you realise you're insane? i'm guessing it's not long after you're sitting ridiculing another teams manager in march 2009 as a newcastle supporter

so is xisco confirmed gay then? looks like a fuckin flamer from those pics

hilarious the baby oils out for enrique now imo...people were queing up to slate the poor cunt basically 'cause he was foreign from what i could see 11 of him in the team we'd have 11 left backs you know what i mean

fail Wtf are you on. doesn't work, was a one for one relegation - if it hadn't been SU went down it would have been WH there are 20 teams in the league, the other 18 can't reasonably get involved as it's a direct vs an indirect effect...they'd have had to play a team regardless who it was, the chelp is between 2 teams....anyone else would be laughed out No they won't, the law has recognised that West Ham would have been relegated without Tevez. Any effect West Ham had on any party could not have happened in their eyes. You could argue Sheff utd would be easier to play than West Ham. I bet you that someone will try this on or a similar case. sorry btw, sounded aggressive perhaps wasn't meant to be see what you're saying that it COULD be tried but it won't be to me you can only prove CT's goals relegated SU as it was direct...any goals he scored against other teams are meaningless and didn't he leave for manu the next season anyway? we live in a sue culture, granted, but what i'm saying is your suggestion would never see the light of day because then you'd be down to legal action over dodgy red cards at both ends of the table etc... Exactly, I think the fact that this has happened now will change the culture of football. How is West Ham playing Carlos Tevez and staying up any different to a ref giving a penwhen they shouldn't have and that meaning you lose a game and go down. I think this could royally fuck football. ah, i see personally i reckon they'll close shop with people up top realising what you outline can't be allowed to happen...sweetener to the players and staff involved at SU and it all goes away guaranteed

fail Wtf are you on. doesn't work, was a one for one relegation - if it hadn't been SU went down it would have been WH there are 20 teams in the league, the other 18 can't reasonably get involved as it's a direct vs an indirect effect...they'd have had to play a team regardless who it was, the chelp is between 2 teams....anyone else would be laughed out No they won't, the law has recognised that West Ham would have been relegated without Tevez. Any effect West Ham had on any party could not have happened in their eyes. You could argue Sheff utd would be easier to play than West Ham. I bet you that someone will try this on or a similar case. sorry btw, sounded aggressive perhaps wasn't meant to be see what you're saying that it COULD be tried but it won't be to me you can only prove CT's goals relegated SU as it was direct...any goals he scored against other teams are meaningless and didn't he leave for manu the next season anyway? we live in a sue culture, granted, but what i'm saying is your suggestion would never see the light of day because then you'd be down to legal action over dodgy red cards at both ends of the table etc...

fail Wtf are you on. doesn't work, was a one for one relegation - if it hadn't been SU went down it would have been WH there are 20 teams in the league, the other 18 can't reasonably get involved as it's a direct vs an indirect effect...they'd have had to play a team regardless who it was, the chelp is between 2 teams....anyone else would be laughed out

fail

interesting from warnock about him and the players being able to sue themselves...i.e. a breach of the rules (proven) cost him his PL manager status and the 1st team squad their status as players the players that got relegated will have taken a forced pay cut no doubt fuck west ham...they deserved more at the time, hope they get reamed now

indeed, but when you add to ALL of that the off field problems we've had since december; kk turmoil, owner selling club, protests, "bouycott", owner not selling club, captain won't sign contract, best keeper sold due to unhappiness, , hughton, calderwood.... it'll be a fuckin miracle if we DON'T go down tbh, last club i remember were as fucked up a mess as us were west ham, and we know how that ended don't we?

thought it was After Stoke Hull I will know whethr to be really worried or not...

"And Spurs' preposterously talented and endearingly clueless 19-year-old Adel Taarabt has gone on loan to QPR." yesterdays fiver, made me laugh...thought him and "Gio" were gonna rule the world?

fuckin get in son that's the spirit...wish i was at home now, i'd buy a season ticket today

I don't think Souness was the only reason for our decline, by any means. Also, with both Liverpool and us, he took over clubs at a bad time, but having said that, I think there's a flaw in his man management skills which regularly gets exposed when the going gets tough. So definitely not. It exasperates me that half the time we're talking about stability, and the other half we're talking about changing the manager yet again. This has been such a traumatic season, on and off the field, that we can't judge Kinnear at this point. He's been firefighting, and providing he still has the support of the dressing room, he should be given a summer transfer window and another season to show what he can do. what? is that supposed to be fucking funny?

can someone pm me a link to this? fuckin works computer nazi IT bastards

least the fuckin pitiful crying cunts who throw themselves in front of the cameras will actually have something to shed a tear about this time the 'mongfest' tv interviews will be murder though...!

see my post johnny, covers the lot

the size of the TV deal doesn't matter if clubs see it as a green light to live TOO far beyond their capabilities. indubitably- remember the collapse of the ITV deal years back, that f***ed clubs who were budgeting for money they never had, as did leeds of course! like to throw leeds in for the sake of it, gets people's backs up :wink: football operates in a bubble, always has done...nobody can seriously think the PL is going to increase in popularity can they? except people employed either in or by the PL as it serves them to believe so...seems to me people are sick of it, sick of paying 60 quid a month or something for sky etc... as the economy gets worse it'll catch up with football, has to then we'll see what's what even if sky doesn't do an "itv" it matters little if you give the clubs 100mill a year tv money if they see it as a green light to up wages to 200mill a year. my opinion is the credit crunch has only speeded up what was happening anyway. indeed, sky won't do an itv of course as murdoch would never allow it but nor would he be able to artificially keep the TV deal fee inflated if the viewing figures and interest weren't there wonder what they make from selling rights abroad, but that'll probably be down the PL rather than sky i guess...domestically is where the interest will wane anyway agree with the point last point for sure

Appiah couldn't prove his fitness, then Spurs went out and signed Palacios. Last I heard he failed a trial at some Russian club, forgot the name. EDIT: According to Wiki.. In February Appiah underwent a trial at FC Rubin Kazan, but the Russian champions decided against signing the player because of the same fitness concerns. wow, how fuckin unfit is he like? and how come he hasn't signed for us if he's that unfit?

the size of the TV deal doesn't matter if clubs see it as a green light to live TOO far beyond their capabilities. indubitably- remember the collapse of the ITV deal years back, that fucked clubs who were budgeting for money they never had, as did leeds of course! like to throw leeds in for the sake of it, gets people's backs up :wink: football operates in a bubble, always has done...nobody can seriously think the PL is going to increase in popularity can they? except people employed either in or by the PL as it serves them to believe so...seems to me people are sick of it, sick of paying 60 quid a month or something for sky etc... as the economy gets worse it'll catch up with football, has to then we'll see what's what

fair point that, anyone still at 1-3, maybe even 4 need some professional help

youtube his goals then tell me he's not a class striker...put him in manyoo's team he'd rule the world imo