-
Posts
49,786 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Kaizero
-
That match was messed up though, Molde was well and truly the dominant side until they for some reason decided to implode a few minutes into the second half.
-
It's Norwegian write-up time. Keep in mind this first post will be opinionated and it usually takes about three-four matches for the spread between toss and awesome to reveal itself for the spring season. Don't bet too big during these first rounds. There, fair warning. How the league could end? General Assesment: Round 1: Single: Rosenborg £100 x 1.80 = £180 Double: Rosenborg Strømsgodset £100 x 2.88 = £288 Treble: Rosenborg Strømsgodset Tromsø £100 x 4.95 = £495 Quadruple: Rosenborg Strømsgodset Tromsø Molde £100 x 11.39 = £1139 Dare to Dream: Rosenborg -1 Molde Vålerenga Fredrikstad £100 x 81.25 = £8125
-
Hangeland would be way too expensive, plus he's getting old. Would rather take a chance on an up and coming talent from abroad.
-
Magnus Wolff Eikrem, a Norwegian footballer who spent three years at Manchester United between the years 15-21 of his life, is counted as a "foreigner" in Molde's player quota regardless of having grown up just a few hundred metres from Molde's training ground for the first 16 years of his life.
-
It has been years since English clubs have dominated in numbers the UEFA/Europa cup. Still have good record in CL which is what counts. Europe's 2nd Trophy is European version the Johnstone Paint with the mighty Boro & Fulham getting to the final only enhances this viewpoint for me. Europa league should show the strength of a league below the top 4. Clearly shows the SUPER SKY PREMIERSHIP is not the all conquering league it is. Really? Is that what you thought last year when England had two teams in the semi-final? I didn't. Italian football must be on life support below Inter. Over a peroid of time I view that on. Should remember italy has just lost it's 4th champs league place to germany. So tonights result don't matter as much than as your view point is over a period of time & last year England had 2 of the semi finalists. Correct. If 2 English sides had made it again this season to the semi finals, then the arguement would be higher. I've always maintained that spain has a stronger league and there record in this competition over the last 6-7 years would go along with that. I don't think the larger English clubs when competing in the Europa in recent years have took it serious. Fulham & Boro finalists ffs!!!! Look at Liverpool, Danny Wilson has started 4 games in Europe compared to 1 in PL. Joe Cole is gaining his fitness back in Europa games, which is shocking imo. We have seen Villa f*** around a few times. As for the Spanish teams it is the only trophy they have a realistic chance of winning because there is nee Barca or Real Madrid in it so they go for it. Aye, and Aston Villa/Liverpool/etc... have a realistic chance of winning the PL so they go for it instead and screw the EL. And Real Madrid/Barça don't dominate the Spanish Cup. This year's final is the first cup Clásico in 20 years. They put qualifying for 4th place above winning a trophy. Sad but true. Who has won the Spanish cup the most? Which team has been in the final the most? Barcelona has won it 25 times. Real has been there 36. (According to Wiki)
-
Anyone keen on the usual Norwegian Tippeliga low-down each round this year as well by the way? Can't be arsed typing that shit out if nobody wants it.
-
It's back. £100 on Molde tomorrow @ 2.10
-
Why i s Carroll 29?
-
Couldn't just say "auto-correct function", could you? No he couldn't. Inferior shit is inferior.
-
I right clicked on my firefox and pressed "tineye search". Less than two seconds. You can do it too. You can be just like me. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tineye-reverse-image-search/
-
Random online pic. Still, wawooweewa. Here's one where you see the legs:
-
I don't get why people keep going on about this as if it was the top of the agenda for the meeting. I mean, I hate FIFA as much as the next guy. But this was surely just a footnote in the meeting? Surely?
-
Fairly certain we're safe. Something big would have to happen for us not to trot out the points we'd need to not manage to keep at least three of the teams behind us, well, behind us.
-
It could surely be should a player grab ahold of another players snood and drag him full force to the ground when running. I can see why it's banned, better safe than sorry. They need to ban Jonas' hair as well then... Well, no. That's a pointless comparison. It's not about the pulling down, it's about what might happen to the neck. Obviously it's a one in a million shot that something bad might happen, but understandably, why allow there to be a one in a million chance just for players to wear something they've not even needed in the past?
-
It could surely be should a player grab ahold of another players snood and drag him full force to the ground when running. I can see why it's banned, better safe than sorry.
-
Daily Mail have changed their article from saying July 1st to Immediate Effect, though.
-
Most news outlets I've read that news in have said "immediate effect". One or two have said "July 1st" though.
-
Highly doubt it given how he's talking about wanting to play for Ireland on it and shit.
-
Accidentially managed to put £50 on us -1 instead of just a win.