Am I correct in thinking Caulkin isn't responsible for the headline writing?
I would have thought someone else does that, aye.
For the record
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2008/aug/11/newcastleunited.premierleague1?gusrc=rss&feed=football
I think that should say...
"Newcastle leave MEDIA in the dark over new signings"
They're clearly pissed off at the lack of info being given to them.
Medicals can also take just a few hours. I don't think it has to be that thorough seeing as he played every minute last season, this isn't Damien Duff we're signing.
You can't blame people for being frustrated. It was reported that he was going to be signing on monday, then tuesday, then wednesday, then today. Yet the latest says he is still in Spain.
This is quite irrelevant, but remember Nicko's thread? They're all discussing whether Oba is good enough for them.
http://www.brfcs.co.uk/mb/index.php?showtopic=19384&st=2120
Yet it's Newcastle fans that have a reputation for being deluded.
You think he's been herding his goats on the runway or something? He's a fat cunt, but i don't think this is his fault, he's agreed a fee and will want the money as quickly as possible.
I'm all for secrecy, but they're taking it too f***ing far! I'm surprised they're not making the new guys play in balaclava's
they now get booked for covering theitr face
They could use something that looks realistic enough for them not to get booked.
http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/7298.jpg
Much less is expected of Sunderland, so yes by their standards they have done ok. If we had made their signings though they would be labeled as overpaid players on their way down.