To be fair like, I don't see what other intentions or motivations she can have other than greed and money.
Sexual offences against a child are probably the lowest of the low, there is no justification for staying with and supporting someone who is guilty of it. Especially with the information coming out of the trial about his intentions and the way he conducted himself through it all.
It's more what he's said in court for me that makes it bizarre. "You wanted sexual activity with her?" 'Yes.'
Why would she stay with him after revelations like that (even if the girl was 27)? Just.. strange.
I get what you're both saying, and maybe you're right or at least maybe that's part of it. You look at things like battered person syndrome and it's easy to think "he's beating the fuck out of you on the daily, get the fuck out," but it's just not that easy. This is a different situation, but it does make me think that it might be a bit trickier than it appears.