Loki679

Wonder if PIF have heard something about the APT case

Relax, we got this.

Wouldn't they just buy him from Frankfurt for £100m then? Frankfurt get £170m for Ekitike, Liverpool get Isak for £20m less than they bid and we get the shitty end of the stick?

Everyone kept saying Gotham Town had gone downhill but we never realised quite how far.

'I don't know, Jeff'

He doesn't seem the type to kick up a fuss and try and force a move.

I was answering Rich's question People are getting jumpy.

Big Jimbo cut the rations again?

New contract for Isak.

One of us! One of us! One of.... Oh, you were talking about rubbish Bruno. Never mind.

We'll get £7m for Big Joe and £12m + £1m in add-ons for Bruno in the same deal that Liverpool get £450m for a geriatric Salah and Man Utd get £300m for some bloke who works in the ticket office.

Let's be honest. This is all because of Yorkie's thread title.

Well, tbf this is a lot more fun than wrestling with Leicester for the signing of Choudhary on loan or some shit.

6. Buy Ekitike. Keep Isak. Buy Salah and VVD and make them stewards in the Gallowgate bogs. Buy Anfield and fill it with turd. Knock down Anfield letting the turd flow through the city, significantly improving the place. Obtain the worldwide rights to the phrase 'Calm down' and bugs bunny Liverpool off to the middle of the Atlantic before sinking it to make the world a better place.

Get some black and white stripes on that sign and lose the 'Committee Room' and you're onto something.

We might be PSR limited but we can't be cash poor. Just drive a big truck full of gold coins up to their office and start pouring.

DCL is the better player anyway. He gets injured far more and can't score goals so he's clearly the superior striker.

Your honour, the defence submits prior art which invalidates the plaintiff's claim.

Didn't we buy Isak because we failed to land the striker we were after at the time? Feels like history repeating.

I won't believe it until we have a private jet landing from Burnley airport.

Ours isn't club only, it's for every game for every team.

We get every game on a streaming service here. It would be feasible to run a streaming only service while still maintaining the Sky etc broadcast service (albeit on reduced pricing terms to the broadcasters).

Nothing going on with Scalvini then?