SteV

Would have been £16.1m if they bothered with bins.

I think it was 30%, but as @AyeDubbleYoo says likely to be lower this season in order to facilitate the choosing of seats.

Not sure the bit in bold is true like, at least via ballot anyway.

From what Howe said in his last presser, I’d guess at after the next break.

Already played more games for us than he did for Spurs. Which surprised me tbh.

Might be more for family reasons if they’re still living up here?

I don’t think Bunce determines whether someone’s toe is OK to play, surely that’s a physio/doctor decision? Bunce is more about monitoring players loads and output, trying to avoid muscle injuries etc, I would have thought.

Nah, they’ve changed the rules so you can only amortise over a maximum of 5 years (or is it 4?), regardless of the actual length of contract. Although having said that, players signed prior to the rule change are still amortised over the length they signed on (I think), but I doubt you can subsequently add further contract extensions to them to amortise them even further.

How much is my tax going up then?

Could see all the East Stand mob being absolutely buzzing with being shifted to L7. Might need to install another lift though.

He’s their most creative player so you’re almost certainly right.

Interesting (and obvious) comparison with Ginola given the goal and strip. Completely different type of players obviously, but interesting that he’s already scored more for us than Ginola did.

Romero shite again. He’s a liability.

Just in case any of these become relevant to us…

27 shots on target is obscene

You’re not exaggerating in the slightest… https://youtu.be/PZAy7mBccqU?si=MWIgCBJjM0ZfsDRN Some of the passing and moving man, so, so good. Anyone find the final shot stats for it? I genuinely can’t imagine there’s been many PL games where a side has had as many shots on target.

“Family settled in the North East” seems a bit unlikely mind.

2033 man. WTF are they doing?

I suspect Man City probably will be given what they banked this window. *outcome of court case permitting obviously

Best thing about that is the poor lad doing the interview desperately trying to redirect him to talk about the actual match and getting completely ignored each time 😂

It’s not that bizarre. Tonali was also allowed to play on until he was found guilty. The Paqueta case seems considerably more complex, and he’s obviously pleading innocence, something Tonali never did. Going off the questionable information available so far, I’d suspect that if (big if) Paqueta does eventually get found guilty, he’ll get substantially more than 10 months.

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/newcastle-united-use-146m-skyscraper-29909775

Obviously a degree of truth to that, but it’s the easy way out tbh.

I was about to question how the hell you could have Molineux that high, then I re-read and saw the “view only”. Fair enough. However everything else about going there is utter shite.