Pixelphish Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Quite simply played a huge part in losing that game. Bravo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 all him today, he pardewed his way to this one Aided by a fair amount of s**** on the pitch. All he had to do was make one f***ing change. Jesus. And then what? Our centre halves still would've been mugged off by Deeney and Ighalo being able to out-muscle them. So might have been an idea to play to our strengths then rather than rely on a defence that got raped by the same front pair at St James. The f*** are people watching? The same thing but trying to view it with more balance, maybe? Balance. Christ. Have you actually criticised any players today, by any chance? Or is it just your usual McClaren rant that you've been regurgitating every single week for about the last 7 months? We're back to the Pardew days again are we? Manager gets it all wrong so lets blame the players, or perceived lack of them. Last week was McClaren, I don't recall anyone taking it away from him. Today was McClaren too, fucking shit. Every decision wrong just like most of his time here or we'd have more points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Has to take he majority of the blame for today. The tactics, formation and the subs (Gouffran!). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 You are boring as piss, shite at your job and worst of all you're taking the shine off the Pardews wheels coming off you utter spunk trumpet. Gan boil ya heed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Fucked it up today with 3 at the back shite. Wasn't more like 5 at the back? I wasn't watching but that's what they reckoned on Radio Newcastle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Fucked it up today with 3 at the back shite. Wasn't more like 5 at the back? I wasn't watching but that's what they reckoned on Radio Newcastle. Janmaats average position was in their half mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 TBH the back 3 only got exposed once and Ighalo was offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 all him today, he pardewed his way to this one Aided by a fair amount of s**** on the pitch. All he had to do was make one f***ing change. Jesus. And then what? Our centre halves still would've been mugged off by Deeney and Ighalo being able to out-muscle them. So might have been an idea to play to our strengths then rather than rely on a defence that got raped by the same front pair at St James. The f*** are people watching? The same thing but trying to view it with more balance, maybe? Balance. Christ. Have you actually criticised any players today, by any chance? Or is it just your usual McClaren rant that you've been regurgitating every single week for about the last 7 months? We're back to the Pardew days again are we? Manager gets it all wrong so lets blame the players, or perceived lack of them. Last week was McClaren, I don't recall anyone taking it away from him. Today was McClaren too, f***ing s***. Every decision wrong just like most of his time here or we'd have more points. Why do you only view this as one way or the other? That's my point, I only ever see you criticise one person out of the staff in our whole mess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Fucked it up today with 3 at the back shite. Wasn't more like 5 at the back? I wasn't watching but that's what they reckoned on Radio Newcastle. It was a clear 3 to me, but it was utter shite regardless. Had nothing in midfield or going forwards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Again, the performance was supposed to be a decent one. Same old story with us this season on that day, had chances, played some decent stuff but missed out on the clutch moments. They're not alien to it. I'll repeat, we lost to Watford in the cup, was his plan to lose today? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Again, the performance was supposed to be a decent one. Same old story with us this season on that day, had chances, played some decent stuff but missed out on the clutch moments. They're not alien to it. I'll repeat, we lost to Watford in the cup, was his plan to lose today? So what we lost? I said we played it to decent effect. That means we put in a decent performance with it and your point that 'they don't know what they're doing' isn't entirely valid because they've played it before. FYI, I don't think he should've changed it today but I don't think the result would've been that much different if we'd have played a 4-2-3-1, our deficiencies are there for us all to see when we come up against physical strikers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 all him today, he pardewed his way to this one Aided by a fair amount of s**** on the pitch. All he had to do was make one f***ing change. Jesus. And then what? Our centre halves still would've been mugged off by Deeney and Ighalo being able to out-muscle them. So might have been an idea to play to our strengths then rather than rely on a defence that got raped by the same front pair at St James. The f*** are people watching? The same thing but trying to view it with more balance, maybe? Balance. Christ. Have you actually criticised any players today, by any chance? Or is it just your usual McClaren rant that you've been regurgitating every single week for about the last 7 months? We're back to the Pardew days again are we? Manager gets it all wrong so lets blame the players, or perceived lack of them. Last week was McClaren, I don't recall anyone taking it away from him. Today was McClaren too, f***ing s***. Every decision wrong just like most of his time here or we'd have more points. Why do you only view this as one way or the other? That's my point, I only ever see you criticise one person out of the staff in our whole mess. Because we go through players like a hot knife through butter while holding onto managers for years. It's simple stuff to me. Get a better manager the players will play better. Today was the worst I've seen of McClaren, basically Pardew vs Reading levels of absolute shite. You blame whoever you want but I said before the game started we were beat with that formation and selection and that's how it turned out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 all him today, he pardewed his way to this one Aided by a fair amount of s**** on the pitch. All he had to do was make one f***ing change. Jesus. And then what? Our centre halves still would've been mugged off by Deeney and Ighalo being able to out-muscle them. So might have been an idea to play to our strengths then rather than rely on a defence that got raped by the same front pair at St James. The f*** are people watching? The same thing but trying to view it with more balance, maybe? Balance. Christ. Have you actually criticised any players today, by any chance? Or is it just your usual McClaren rant that you've been regurgitating every single week for about the last 7 months? We're back to the Pardew days again are we? Manager gets it all wrong so lets blame the players, or perceived lack of them. Last week was McClaren, I don't recall anyone taking it away from him. Today was McClaren too, f***ing s***. Every decision wrong just like most of his time here or we'd have more points. Why do you only view this as one way or the other? That's my point, I only ever see you criticise one person out of the staff in our whole mess. Because we go through players like a hot knife through butter while holding onto managers for years. It's simple stuff to me. Get a better manager the players will play better. Today was the worst I've seen of McClaren, basically Pardew vs Reading levels of absolute s****. You blame whoever you want but I said before the game started we were beat with that formation and selection and that's how it turned out. And you don't think there's a decent chance we'd have been beaten in a 4-2-3-1 with 2 physically poor CBs against 2 of the most direct forwards in the league? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 You can't absolve any of the players of criticism though, even if the formation was wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 The 3-5-2 formation is fine, and we probably have the players to pull it off, but you cant just choose it here and there and expect it to work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 So what we lost? I said we played it to decent effect. That means we put in a decent performance with it and your point that 'they don't know what they're doing' isn't entirely valid because they've played it before. FYI, I don't think he should've changed it today but I don't think the result would've been that much different if we'd have played a 4-2-3-1, our deficiencies are there for us all to see when we come up against physical strikers. We played a system which was never going to work as we actually reduced our threat from last week by dropping Perez who wasn't brilliant but offers something in front of goal. We packed the team with defenders and midfielders and played a bloke up front who looks like he couldn't score in a brothel, it was destined to end in failure and did so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 A good manager would have us further up the league IMO. S McC would have Leicesters squad in trouble IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Weakest link among many, appoint a decent manager you fuckwits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 all him today, he pardewed his way to this one Aided by a fair amount of s**** on the pitch. All he had to do was make one f***ing change. Jesus. And then what? Our centre halves still would've been mugged off by Deeney and Ighalo being able to out-muscle them. So might have been an idea to play to our strengths then rather than rely on a defence that got raped by the same front pair at St James. The f*** are people watching? The same thing but trying to view it with more balance, maybe? Balance. Christ. Have you actually criticised any players today, by any chance? Or is it just your usual McClaren rant that you've been regurgitating every single week for about the last 7 months? We're back to the Pardew days again are we? Manager gets it all wrong so lets blame the players, or perceived lack of them. Last week was McClaren, I don't recall anyone taking it away from him. Today was McClaren too, f***ing s***. Every decision wrong just like most of his time here or we'd have more points. Why do you only view this as one way or the other? That's my point, I only ever see you criticise one person out of the staff in our whole mess. Because we go through players like a hot knife through butter while holding onto managers for years. It's simple stuff to me. Get a better manager the players will play better. Today was the worst I've seen of McClaren, basically Pardew vs Reading levels of absolute s****. You blame whoever you want but I said before the game started we were beat with that formation and selection and that's how it turned out. And you don't think there's a decent chance we'd have been beaten in a 4-2-3-1 with 2 physically poor CBs against 2 of the most direct forwards in the league? I think today was reminiscent of early this season with Anita playing at 3rd CB so things looked good until everyone realises we had no attacking intent and we lost. I really don't think I'm alone in thinking if we'd played the same formation as WHU with Aarons at LB we'd have given a much better account of ourselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 So what we lost? I said we played it to decent effect. That means we put in a decent performance with it and your point that 'they don't know what they're doing' isn't entirely valid because they've played it before. FYI, I don't think he should've changed it today but I don't think the result would've been that much different if we'd have played a 4-2-3-1, our deficiencies are there for us all to see when we come up against physical strikers. We played a system which was never going to work as we actually reduced our threat from last week by dropping Perez who wasn't brilliant but offers something in front of goal. We packed the team with defenders and midfielders and played a bloke up front who looks like he couldn't score in a brothel, it was destined to end in failure and did so. Fair enough. By the looks of it, a couple of our players going forward looked pretty off it today so I really don't think it would've made that much difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 The 3-5-2 formation is fine, and we probably have the players to pull it off, but you cant just choose it here and there and expect it to work. It wasn't even 3-5-2 as Mitrovic was effectively up front on his own until we made changes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 So what we lost? I said we played it to decent effect. That means we put in a decent performance with it and your point that 'they don't know what they're doing' isn't entirely valid because they've played it before. FYI, I don't think he should've changed it today but I don't think the result would've been that much different if we'd have played a 4-2-3-1, our deficiencies are there for us all to see when we come up against physical strikers. We played a system which was never going to work as we actually reduced our threat from last week by dropping Perez who wasn't brilliant but offers something in front of goal. We packed the team with defenders and midfielders and played a bloke up front who looks like he couldn't score in a brothel, it was destined to end in failure and did so. Fair enough. By the looks of it, a couple of our players going forward looked pretty off it today so I really don't think it would've made that much difference. I think you're very, very wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Somehow we didn't have any control over possession even though we basically had 6 midfielders on the pitch, not quite sure how we managed that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Let's see what mcbullshits excuse is this week? Thanks for changing a winning formation. Thanks for playing a clearly not ready Aarons out of position. Thanks for not pushing hard for a left back and striker. Thanks for bringing on gouffran. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Aarons, Gouffran, Lascalles, Mbemba all could have played LB at a push. No need for the 3-5-2. It didn't work in the slightest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now