TRon Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 So what's the current update then, is he fit to play on Saturday or not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 he's been getting far too many groin injury's for my liking, and as someone said, it took him two months to recover from the same operation that it took shearer and bellamy 10 days to recover from something is not right, and we don't need player's like him bottling the future of this club tbf, he's not as good as ppl think and won't ever improve as a player, because he hasn't since he was 19-20 at inter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 To be fair if he scored another wondergoal vs Spurs I would happily marry my mother. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Imagine the grief Owen would get if he had done this. It's not like Martins hasn't got grief over this. What I was alluding to mainly was the fact that his injury record has been canny bad over the last two years or so, yet Owen is the one who seems to always get a shed load of stick for his. When Oba's is probably something pretty similar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Imagine the grief Owen would get if he had done this. It's not like Martins hasn't got grief over this. What I was alluding to mainly was the fact that his injury record has been canny bad over the last two years or so, yet Owen is the one who seems to always get a shed load of stick for his. When Oba's is probably something pretty similar. Martins has played 98 games in the last 3 seasons, Owen has played 72 in his Newcastle career. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 His injury record isn't even nearly comparable to Owen's ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 His injury record isn't even nearly comparable to Owen's ffs. The last 18 months since Owen's two serious injuries which were freak incidences, it has been. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Over the last two seasons it is. Owen has played 58 (scored 23) Martins has played 52 (scored 17) I'm not having a go at Martins, I just think both (or neither) should be called injury prone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Over the last two seasons it is. Owen has played 58 (scored 23) Martins has played 52 (scored 17) I'm not having a go at Martins, I just think both (or neither) should be called injury prone. yes but the 'last 2 seasons' represents a somewhat window dressing approach to Owen's record, doesn't it mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Over the last two seasons it is. Owen has played 58 (scored 23) Martins has played 52 (scored 17) I'm not having a go at Martins, I just think both (or neither) should be called injury prone. yes but the 'last 2 seasons' represents a somewhat window dressing approach to Owen's record, doesn't it mate Yeah. Proves he's a better goalscorer as well, doesn't it mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Over the last two seasons it is. Owen has played 58 (scored 23) Martins has played 52 (scored 17) I'm not having a go at Martins, I just think both (or neither) should be called injury prone. yes but the 'last 2 seasons' represents a somewhat window dressing approach to Owen's record, doesn't it mate While only mentioning the last 12 games just to suit your own arguments is perfectly acceptable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 yes, unquestionably, and if you extend in to 9 years it proves Ameobi's a better goalscorer. or if you extend it to 3, the Martins - Owen arguement looks somewhat redundant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Over the last two seasons it is. Owen has played 58 (scored 23) Martins has played 52 (scored 17) I'm not having a go at Martins, I just think both (or neither) should be called injury prone. yes but the 'last 2 seasons' represents a somewhat window dressing approach to Owen's record, doesn't it mate While only mentioning the last 12 games just to suit your own arguments is perfectly acceptable. Exactly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 yes, unquestionably, and if you extend in to 9 years it proves Ameobi's a better goalscorer. No it doesn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Over the last two seasons it is. Owen has played 58 (scored 23) Martins has played 52 (scored 17) I'm not having a go at Martins, I just think both (or neither) should be called injury prone. yes but the 'last 2 seasons' represents a somewhat window dressing approach to Owen's record, doesn't it mate While only mentioning the last 12 games just to suit your own arguments is perfectly acceptable. 13 games, and in that instance I was refering to FORM which is somewhat important, you know when you have 6 games left to save your status in the premiership Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 yes, unquestionably, and if you extend in to 9 years it proves Ameobi's a better goalscorer. or if you extend it to 3, the Martins - Owen arguement looks somewhat redundant Between 1997 and 2000, was someone like Dion Dublin better than Alan Shearer just because 1997/8 for Shearer was basically a write-off due to injury, while Dublin consistently got 15-20 a season for Villa & Coventry? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 yes, unquestionably, and if you extend in to 9 years it proves Ameobi's a better goalscorer. or if you extend it to 3, the Martins - Owen arguement looks somewhat redundant Between 1997 and 2000, was someone like Dion Dublin better than Alan Shearer just because 1997/8 for Shearer was basically a write-off due to injury, while Dublin consistently got 15-20 a season for Villa & Coventry? my orignal post was referring to the injury records of both Owen and Martins, which are not comparable at all. Maybe you missed the point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 During their Newcastle career, according to soccerbase: Michael Owen: 62 apps, 32 goals. Obafemi Martins: 85 apps, 34 goals. Shola Ameobi: 149 apps, 50 goals. Anyone else need more conviction over who's been our most dangerous forward since Shearer goal-wise? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 yes, unquestionably, and if you extend in to 9 years it proves Ameobi's a better goalscorer. or if you extend it to 3, the Martins - Owen arguement looks somewhat redundant Between 1997 and 2000, was someone like Dion Dublin better than Alan Shearer just because 1997/8 for Shearer was basically a write-off due to injury, while Dublin consistently got 15-20 a season for Villa & Coventry? my orignal post was referring to the injury records of both Owen and Martins, which are not comparable at all. Maybe you missed the point This season though, it is. In fact, Martins' has been worse...which is somewhat important, you know, when you have 6 games left to save your status in the Premiership. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Martins is just as prone to 'niggly' injuries as Owen is, it's hard to argue with that. If you take their injury records on face value then Martins looks fit as fuck in comparison to Owen but then you lose sight of the fact EMO did suffer two freak injuries within the space of a year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 yes, unquestionably, and if you extend in to 9 years it proves Ameobi's a better goalscorer. or if you extend it to 3, the Martins - Owen arguement looks somewhat redundant Between 1997 and 2000, was someone like Dion Dublin better than Alan Shearer just because 1997/8 for Shearer was basically a write-off due to injury, while Dublin consistently got 15-20 a season for Villa & Coventry? my orignal post was referring to the injury records of both Owen and Martins, which are not comparable at all. Maybe you missed the point This season though, it is. In fact, Martins' has been worse...which is somewhat important, you know, when you have 6 games left to save your status in the Premiership. If he's fit, he starts as far as I'm concerned, it's a non-issue that some are trying to make into one. With Owen, for me there is genuine worry that his presence in the starting 11 will take us down. There has been nothing in his last few games to suggest he'll help keep us up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Ronaldo and Optimistic Nut are reaching NE5 esque levels when it comes to Obafemi Martins and Michael Owen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Ronaldo and Optimistic Nut are reaching NE5 esque levels when it comes to Obafemi Martins and Michael Owen. Shush you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 Ronaldo and Optimistic Nut are reaching NE5 esque levels when it comes to Obafemi Martins and Michael Owen. Baba, honest opinion. If Shola had gone and declared himself to Nigeria, what would you have thought? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 yes, unquestionably, and if you extend in to 9 years it proves Ameobi's a better goalscorer. or if you extend it to 3, the Martins - Owen arguement looks somewhat redundant Between 1997 and 2000, was someone like Dion Dublin better than Alan Shearer just because 1997/8 for Shearer was basically a write-off due to injury, while Dublin consistently got 15-20 a season for Villa & Coventry? my orignal post was referring to the injury records of both Owen and Martins, which are not comparable at all. Maybe you missed the point This season though, it is. In fact, Martins' has been worse...which is somewhat important, you know, when you have 6 games left to save your status in the Premiership. If he's fit, he starts as far as I'm concerned, it's a non-issue that some are trying to make into one. With Owen, for me there is genuine worry that his presence in the starting 11 will take us down. There has been nothing in his last few games to suggest he'll help keep us up Last day of the season against Villa, last kick of the game and one of our strikers* is one on one with their 'keeper. They score we win the game and stay up, we draw we go down. Who would you have taking the shot? *Nile Ranger not included Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now