Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is Barry really better than Alonso?

 

is he fuck

 

if arsenal sign alonso for a decent fee they'll be the winners in this whole gig - alonso sitting deep spraying passes about for arsenals pace-merchants to get on the end of...frightening prospect

 

That's what I'm thinking. Why would they get rid of Alonso for Barry?

 

Because Rafa thinks he'll form a better partnership with Gerrard would be my guess.

 

Wenger has started casting loving eyes at Alonso.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why would they want to sell him? ???

 

Just signed Ben Haim so Richards at right back?

 

 

Richards in midfield probably.

 

Ben Haim and Dunne at the back. New, proper right back instead of playing a rotating collection of centre backs there.

That wouldn't make any sense, they've got money to burn out of their arse and they're selling one of their best players because they got Ben Haim? And they're going to push their best defender into midfield...  :shifty:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why would they want to sell him? ???

 

Just signed Ben Haim so Richards at right back?

 

 

Richards in midfield probably.

 

Ben Haim and Dunne at the back. New, proper right back instead of playing a rotating collection of centre backs there.

That wouldn't make any sense, they've got money to burn out of their arse and they're selling one of their best players because they got Ben Haim? And they're going to push their best defender into midfield...  :shifty:

 

I don't think they've got much at all tbh.

 

Apparently the money they've spent has been borrowed from the banks and Shiniwatra could be getting locked up like his missus. :laugh:

 

The Ronaldinho bid was all through sponsorships.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why would they want to sell him? ???

 

Just signed Ben Haim so Richards at right back?

 

 

Richards in midfield probably.

 

Ben Haim and Dunne at the back. New, proper right back instead of playing a rotating collection of centre backs there.

That wouldn't make any sense, they've got money to burn out of their arse and they're selling one of their best players because they got Ben Haim? And they're going to push their best defender into midfield...  :shifty:

 

They haven't got money to burn at all. Thaksin has hardly spent f*** all and Jo, his only big signing, is costing them buttons in the short term, paid on the drip over several years.

 

Richards has played midfield before- they need a defensive midfielder and don't have the money to buy anyone good.

 

Edit- and why would Ben Haim leave Chelsea's bench for City's? He'll be going there to play every week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why would they want to sell him? ???

 

Just signed Ben Haim so Richards at right back?

 

 

Richards in midfield probably.

 

Ben Haim and Dunne at the back. New, proper right back instead of playing a rotating collection of centre backs there.

That wouldn't make any sense, they've got money to burn out of their arse and they're selling one of their best players because they got Ben Haim? And they're going to push their best defender into midfield...  :shifty:

 

They haven't got money to burn at all. Thaksin has hardly spent f*** all and Jo, his only big signing, is costing them buttons in the short term, paid on the drip over several years.

 

Richards has played midfield before- they need a defensive midfielder and don't have the money to buy anyone good.

 

Edit- and why would Ben Haim leave Chelsea's bench for City's? He'll be going there to play every week.

 

Also, City forums seem to think they have bid for Santa Cruz but they need to raise some cash first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On paper their team looks good mind. Arguably could compete with you, Blackburn, Villa, etc. even if they're not brilliant, if Keane can keep them injury free and consistent they could do well. They still need a defence mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why would they want to sell him? ???

 

Just signed Ben Haim so Richards at right back?

 

 

Richards in midfield probably.

 

Ben Haim and Dunne at the back. New, proper right back instead of playing a rotating collection of centre backs there.

That wouldn't make any sense, they've got money to burn out of their arse and they're selling one of their best players because they got Ben Haim? And they're going to push their best defender into midfield...  :shifty:

 

They haven't got money to burn at all. Thaksin has hardly spent f*** all and Jo, his only big signing, is costing them buttons in the short term, paid on the drip over several years.

 

Richards has played midfield before- they need a defensive midfielder and don't have the money to buy anyone good.

 

Edit- and why would Ben Haim leave Chelsea's bench for City's? He'll be going there to play every week.

 

Apparently Corluka all agreed at £6.8m subject to a medical.

 

Irrespective of whether City have got money or not, I'm surprised they would be selling a good player they got last summer at a loss for no good reason.  He has proved himself able in the Premier League after all.  Kicking off in the City forums......................... :lol:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why would they want to sell him? ???

 

Just signed Ben Haim so Richards at right back?

 

 

Richards in midfield probably.

 

Ben Haim and Dunne at the back. New, proper right back instead of playing a rotating collection of centre backs there.

That wouldn't make any sense, they've got money to burn out of their arse and they're selling one of their best players because they got Ben Haim? And they're going to push their best defender into midfield...  :shifty:

 

They haven't got money to burn at all. Thaksin has hardly spent f*** all and Jo, his only big signing, is costing them buttons in the short term, paid on the drip over several years.

 

Richards has played midfield before- they need a defensive midfielder and don't have the money to buy anyone good.

 

Edit- and why would Ben Haim leave Chelsea's bench for City's? He'll be going there to play every week.

 

Apparently Corluka all agreed at £6.8m subject to a medical.

 

Irrespective of whether City have got money or not, I'm surprised they would be selling a good player they got last summer at a loss for no good reason.  He has proved himself able in the Premier League after all.  Kicking off in the City forums......................... :lol:

 

 

Did you ever find out who the two medicals were booked for by the way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...