Teasy Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 it's because we have a very small squad, we should of bought players in before selling the likes of emre and rozehnal i'm starting to get worried now, remember the fact that there will probs be 10,000 less season ticket holders mean's the club has even less money the problem still lie's back to the high earners at the club, duff, smith etc, they are taking around 10 million a year in wages and do f*** all for the first team What's that got to do with making money available though? Also to be honest losing the likes of Emre and Rozenhal leaves us needing just as many new players as before they left considering Rozenhal was out on loan and Emre never played. well there is money there, if there wasn't keegan would be out in shot yes, but there we're still our players, so we could of used them next season, we got rid of another 5 players as well, even though i wouldn't of had them in the first team, they could be used for when injuries happen i hope the club isn't banking on clubs to reduce their transfer terms when the end of the window happens, risky business Rozehnal was a player we could have used as backup yes, but he obviously wasn't happy with that role. Emre we couldn't have used next season because the man either can't or didn't want to play for us, he made 8 starts last season... 8!! well it depend's what positions do you think we need FIRST TEAM players for, we have imo a very decent first team, but we need backup as there's hardly none? we need at least 2 more defenders, a playmaker and a striker imo how many do you think? I think we need a central defender, young backup left and right backs, top quality attacking midfielder and a backup striker. That requirement hasn't changed since losing the likes of Emre, Rozenhal, Carr, Babayaro ect. Partly because none of those players actually played for us when they were here, and partly because they weren't good enough (with the acception of 8 games a season Emre ). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 it's because we have a very small squad, we should of bought players in before selling the likes of emre and rozehnal i'm starting to get worried now, remember the fact that there will probs be 10,000 less season ticket holders mean's the club has even less money the problem still lie's back to the high earners at the club, duff, smith etc, they are taking around 10 million a year in wages and do f*** all for the first team What's that got to do with making money available though? Also to be honest losing the likes of Emre and Rozenhal leaves us needing just as many new players as before they left considering Rozenhal was out on loan and Emre never played. well there is money there, if there wasn't keegan would be out in shot yes, but there we're still our players, so we could of used them next season, we got rid of another 5 players as well, even though i wouldn't of had them in the first team, they could be used for when injuries happen i hope the club isn't banking on clubs to reduce their transfer terms when the end of the window happens, risky business Rozehnal was a player we could have used as backup yes, but he obviously wasn't happy with that role. Emre we couldn't have used next season because the man either can't or didn't want to play for us, he made 8 starts last season... 8!! well it depend's what positions do you think we need FIRST TEAM players for, we have imo a very decent first team, but we need backup as there's hardly none? we need at least 2 more defenders, a playmaker and a striker imo how many do you think? I think we need a central defender, young backup left and right backs, top quality attacking midfielder and a backup striker. That requirement hasn't changed since losing the likes of Emre, Rozenhal, Carr, Babayaro ect. Partly because none of those players actually played for us when they were here, and partly because they weren't good enough (with the acception of 8 games a season Emre ). yes, what we need is quality not quantity, as keegan has said, it's about getting the right players, something this club hasn't done for a long while Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaetihS Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. you still here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. Fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. i never heard someone so wrong in my whole life Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. Fact is KK has achieved more than Keane as a manager! Look at his record ffs! Also was a very successful player like Keane.. so you draw this conclusion how?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
olliemort Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. Your taking the piss,right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 People still actually bite to MaetihS? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaetihS Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 KK good track record with us has been tarnished since. dun think many of the younger players heard of KK and if so, associate more with his failures with England and less glam clubs like Man City (then. now arguably a bigger draw than us) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. Your taking the piss,right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 KK good track record with us has been tarnished since. dun think many of the younger players heard of KK and if so, associate more with his failures with England and less glam clubs like Man City (then. now arguably a bigger draw than us) Most young players aint heard of Sunderland.. so your point? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Sir Les is quite right. as evidenced by rejections from players, KK is no longer a big draw...like a idoitic Mackem said, KK symbolises failure to players these days while Keane is a bigger name due to his Man U days. I think you've suffered overkill in the WUM stakes, lad. You've made it that people know you're going to post shite like that from just seeing your name, so nobody takes what you say seriously. Your best bet would be to take a more positive approach and every now and again slip something like this in, it would be much more affective but you may need a new identity first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 KK good track record with us has been tarnished since. dun think many of the younger players heard of KK and if so, associate more with his failures with England and less glam clubs like Man City (then. now arguably a bigger draw than us) Most wrong post ever. wp. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustynrg Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 The "shiteam" twat's a wum, ignore him FFS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 just ban the fucker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Problem is that if we ban him we won't get vital, expert DVD reviews of all our future signings. I don't think we could live without that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garth Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 just ban the fucker This is a football forum everyone has the right to their opinion, even if you don't agree with it, there is no need for personal abuse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 I wondered where Northern Monkey went, actually. Did he get a new account to try and get some sort of response? Just fucking ban it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 just ban the fucker This is a football forum everyone has the right to their opinion, even if you don't agree with it, there is no need for personal abuse. The problem is, its not personal opinion though. Its always the OTT negative opinion, simply just to get people riled. No place for that really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Just ignore him, really isn't that hard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flair Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 just ban the fucker He's only voicing his opinion. He provides good comedy and sometimes talks sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 just ban the fucker He's only voicing his opinion. He provides good comedy and sometimes talks sense. No he doesn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garth Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 just ban the fucker This is a football forum everyone has the right to their opinion, even if you don't agree with it, there is no need for personal abuse. The problem is, its not personal opinion though. Its always the OTT negative opinion, simply just to get people riled. No place for that really. It well maybe! but it's still his opinion, you don't have to agree with it, just because he is negative most of the times it's only one persons opinion so it really doesn't matter does it? just ignore like I do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flair Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 just ban the fucker He's only voicing his opinion. He provides good comedy and sometimes talks sense. No he doesn't. The reactions from people to his posts are the comedy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now