madras Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 The new Dyer or the new Woodgate? Sorry for the lad if true, but f***ing hilarious on the other hand. don't forget drunken duncan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 The new Dyer or the new Woodgate? Only if it's long term. But just imagine making £55m on 3 permacrocks if so. Holy shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 hypothetically, say carroll never did ever get on a pitch for liverpool (i know im sure he will) but if he didn't would they be entitled to not have to pay us the £35m or could they only claim it back on insurance? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 hypothetically, say carroll never did ever get on a pitch for liverpool (i know im sure he will) but if he didn't would they be entitled to not have to pay us the £35m or could they only claim it back on insurance? "Buyer beware" as Shepherd said of Woodgate's transfer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Can't wait to see the 'Conned Over Carroll' t-shirts on the terraces like, will be immense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 hypothetically, say carroll never did ever get on a pitch for liverpool (i know im sure he will) but if he didn't would they be entitled to not have to pay us the £35m or could they only claim it back on insurance? They've already paid us up front £30m, they'd have no claim to that and even if it were in instalments they'd still have to pay and if didn't we'd successfully take them to court for it (See Al Fayed with Steve Marlet and refusing to pay the final two years due to him believing he was ripped off) IF he never made it back on the pitch the only way they'd see their money again is to claim off insurance, which I'd always heard that you cannot get if you don't pass a medical, Carroll didn't pass a full medical, so not sure if that was enough what he did pass or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Justice for the £35m hahahahaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesPaul Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Liverpool knew about Carroll's injury. No insurance policy would cover that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 hypothetically, say carroll never did ever get on a pitch for liverpool (i know im sure he will) but if he didn't would they be entitled to not have to pay us the £35m or could they only claim it back on insurance? They've already paid us up front £30m, they'd have no claim to that and even if it were in instalments they'd still have to pay and if didn't we'd successfully take them to court for it (See Al Fayed with Steve Marlet and refusing to pay the final two years due to him believing he was ripped off) IF he never made it back on the pitch the only way they'd see their money again is to claim off insurance, which I'd always heard that you cannot get if you don't pass a medical, Carroll didn't pass a full medical, so not sure if that was enough what he did pass or not. loved him whiie he was here but now he isnt that would be brilliant if that happened haha i think id be like cartman and blow a funny fuse, never find anything else funny again haha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'm was quite sure the Michael Owen transfer to us had something to do over the Woodgate deal (rumours of some medical information we didn't disclose in the deal). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'm was quite sure the Michael Owen transfer to us had something to do over the Woodgate deal (rumours of some medical information we didn't disclose in the deal). Possibly the most nonsensical sentence in the history of humankind. Well played. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 hypothetically, say carroll never did ever get on a pitch for liverpool (i know im sure he will) but if he didn't would they be entitled to not have to pay us the £35m or could they only claim it back on insurance? They've already paid us up front £30m, they'd have no claim to that and even if it were in instalments they'd still have to pay and if didn't we'd successfully take them to court for it (See Al Fayed with Steve Marlet and refusing to pay the final two years due to him believing he was ripped off) IF he never made it back on the pitch the only way they'd see their money again is to claim off insurance, which I'd always heard that you cannot get if you don't pass a medical, Carroll didn't pass a full medical, so not sure if that was enough what he did pass or not. Exactly. It's not our fault they bought a crock/didn't examine him thoroughly enough. This is like an eBay 'buy as seen'. He's fucked, it's not our problem. And there'd be no court in the land that would rule in favour of Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 hypothetically, say carroll never did ever get on a pitch for liverpool (i know im sure he will) but if he didn't would they be entitled to not have to pay us the £35m or could they only claim it back on insurance? They've already paid us up front £30m, they'd have no claim to that and even if it were in instalments they'd still have to pay and if didn't we'd successfully take them to court for it (See Al Fayed with Steve Marlet and refusing to pay the final two years due to him believing he was ripped off) IF he never made it back on the pitch the only way they'd see their money again is to claim off insurance, which I'd always heard that you cannot get if you don't pass a medical, Carroll didn't pass a full medical, so not sure if that was enough what he did pass or not. Exactly. It's not our fault they bought a crock/didn't examine him thoroughly enough. This is like an eBay 'buy as seen'. He's fucked, it's not our problem. And there'd be no court in the land that would rule in favour of Liverpool. Hmm, I'm sure the same court that acquitted Stevie G of him beating the DJ would disagree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'm was quite sure the Michael Owen transfer to us had something to do over the Woodgate deal (rumours of some medical information we didn't disclose in the deal). Possibly the most nonsensical sentence in the history of humankind. Well played. Well yeah, exactly. What do you mean neesy, that we acknowledged we'd sold them a crock and agreed to buy a crock in return? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 I'm was quite sure the Michael Owen transfer to us had something to do over the Woodgate deal (rumours of some medical information we didn't disclose in the deal). Possibly the most nonsensical sentence in the history of humankind. Well played. Well yeah, exactly. What do you mean neesy, that we acknowledged we'd sold them a crock and agreed to buy a crock in return? Real were apparently looking at legal action against us over the medical information we did not disclose, I'm sure Freddie's 16M offer for Owen helped to quiet down that threat. Obviously it's all speculation but I don't think it's far fetched as people may think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Sounds like tittle tattle tbh, but fair do's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Neesy, God bless him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Sounds like tittle tattle tbh, but fair do's. It sounds like something Parky would come up with after smoking two ounces of weed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Sounds like tittle tattle tbh, but fair do's. Yeah, just think it's something Shepherd would considering doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Thump 1892 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Newcastle-manager-Alan-Pardew-claims-insisting-Andy-Carroll-was-not-for-sale-was-a-ploy-to-keep-buyers-away-article691761.html And the truth starts coming out. So much to read into I don't even know where to begin. Sorry if it has already been posted, I just skimmed the last two pages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Don't see what's wrong new about that? Probably just trying to covering himself for the 'Carroll is going nowhere' comments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 The libel in this thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Thump 1892 Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Don't see what's wrong new about that? Probably just trying to covering himself for the 'Carroll is going nowhere' comments. Dunno, I think he's being straight. Nothing wrong with it btw, I'm just surprised he's came out and said it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Don't see what's wrong new about that? Probably just trying to covering himself for the 'Carroll is going nowhere' comments. Dunno, I think he's being straight. Nothing wrong with it btw, I'm just surprised he's came out and said it. Oh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted February 6, 2011 Share Posted February 6, 2011 Hope he doesn't end up a permacrock like Woodgate. IIRC , it was this kind of injury that started his problems. Jinxed the fuck out of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts