cp40 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Mackems build an average squad and sign a couple players this window- Now qualified to value players at bigger clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Mike & Derek might as well just get pardew bent over a table and shove a dildo up his arse if a bid is accepted given what he's been saying like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 If Newcastle turn down 30m for Andy Carroll they're absolutely mental. That's an outrageous offer for someone who has only had a good six months in the Premiership. And look at it on the otherside, we have a striker now thats worth more then 30 mil and other teams sniffing round. i think retaining the asset is far better. Assets can depreciate as well as appreciate - he would need to come back fit and continue to score goals or his price will plummet. There's no guarantee he'll do that - teams will inevitably start to come to terms with him (like they tend to do with all players) so he'll find it increasingly difficult. This time last year Bobby Zamora was the next big thing.... You could buy half a dozen good players with £30m. Like I said, if they've turned that down they are absolutely mental. Incompetent. Bitter nonsense. Care to explain how that's nonsense? Or indeed why I'm bitter given how swimmingly things are going at the club I support at the moment? If you think £30m isn't a hugely inflated price for an INJURED player with limited Premier League pedigree and considerable off the field problems it's you who is talking nonsense. He's scored 11 goals ffs and a good number of those are from set-pieces. I very much doubt anyone will ever offer anything like that for him again. I joined this board to join in the banter and have a bit of debate, not wind people up. Anyone with half a brain can see that Liverpool have hugely over valued him if the offer that's rumoured to have been made has in fact been made. Bollocks, Injured player is a reason we should sell him WTF, name me a footballer that doesn't get injured. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Hark at the jealous Mackem, man. Probably even more pissed off because they aren't getting a mention on transfer day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Mike & Derek might as well just get pardew bent over a table and shove a dildo up his arse if a bid is accepted given what he's been saying like Disagree here, i believe he wasn't for sale as they didn't expect a bid this big. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Mike & Derek might as well just get pardew bent over a table and shove a dildo up his arse if a bid is accepted given what he's been saying like I'm pretty sure that was a part of the interview process. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Mike & Derek might as well just get pardew bent over a table and shove a dildo up his arse if a bid is accepted given what he's been saying like i hope thats done at a press conference Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 30m is a fucking lot of money. I would reject it only because you have no time to replace him now and would greatly compromise the rest of your season. But I would think again in the summer depending on where you end up in the table. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrisjraby Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 I think the big thing in our favour here is that it's the last day of the window and we'd never replace him in time. Can't help but think that if we had a week or so left, this would've been accepted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 How much is AC9 'Reportedly' on per week? £45k a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 It would be nice to have £30m+ to spend on players, but it's a matter of if it would go back into the squad. I doubt Ashley would be as incompetent as Quinn was with the Bent transfer at least, so I'd hope we'd demand it all upfront. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 How much is AC9 'Reportedly' on per week? £30k. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Carroll is 1/5 to join Liverpool on SkyBet. Might lay some money on BetFair then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Should we get a poll started again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 How much is AC9 'Reportedly' on per week? £45k a week. seriously? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 If Newcastle turn down 30m for Andy Carroll they're absolutely mental. That's an outrageous offer for someone who has only had a good six months in the Premiership. And look at it on the otherside, we have a striker now thats worth more then 30 mil and other teams sniffing round. i think retaining the asset is far better. Assets can depreciate as well as appreciate - he would need to come back fit and continue to score goals or his price will plummet. There's no guarantee he'll do that - teams will inevitably start to come to terms with him (like they tend to do with all players) so he'll find it increasingly difficult. This time last year Bobby Zamora was the next big thing.... You could buy half a dozen good players with £30m. Like I said, if they've turned that down they are absolutely mental. Incompetent. Bitter nonsense. Care to explain how that's nonsense? Or indeed why I'm bitter given how swimmingly things are going at the club I support at the moment? If you think £30m isn't a hugely inflated price for an INJURED player with limited Premier League pedigree and considerable off the field problems it's you who is talking nonsense. He's scored 11 goals ffs and a good number of those are from set-pieces. I very much doubt anyone will ever offer anything like that for him again. I joined this board to join in the banter and have a bit of debate, not wind people up. Anyone with half a brain can see that Liverpool have hugely over valued him if the offer that's rumoured to have been made has in fact been made. You monkeys got any pitch invasions/opposition player attacks planned at the Stadium of Light in the near future ? Got to be more interesting for you than speculation about a Newcastle player's future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 How much is AC9 'Reportedly' on per week? £45k a week. seriously? New contract in November, from what I was told he was on at least 40k a week now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NQsDiscoPants Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Hark at the jealous Mackem, man. Probably even more pissed off because they aren't getting a mention on transfer day. That's because we've done good business already. We have a stronger squad now than we did three weeks ago and have even more wedge in the bank to be thrown around in the summer. £30m for someone with less than 20 PL goals ffs. The world's gone mad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 How much is AC9 'Reportedly' on per week? £45k a week. seriously? No. No one knows. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 It would be nice to have £30m+ to spend on players, but it's a matter of if it would go back into the squad. I doubt Ashley would be as incompetent as Quinn was with the Bent transfer at least, so I'd hope we'd demand it all upfront. you could be onto something- as ashley likes his money on the table- but you can bet the tores money is on account. and Liverpools owners havent got cash to buy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 anyone who thinks Carroll should go for £30m are off their head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Hark at the jealous Mackem, man. Probably even more pissed off because they aren't getting a mention on transfer day. That's because we've done good business already. We have a stronger squad now than we did three weeks ago and have even more wedge in the bank to be thrown around in the summer. £30m for someone with less than 20 PL goals ffs. The world's gone mad. oh yeah - i look forward to all your confidence pre derbies again next season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 £30m can be pissed away on nothing very easily. It could get you Luque, Owen and Emre, for instance. With the going rate for strikers we'd have to pay big money anyway to get a suitable replacement, and tbh it is highly unlikely a player of Carroll's calibre, with no ties to Newcastle, would really consider coming here. Also i doubt Carroll is on that much a week, buying a bunch of new players with any money received would end up being more expensive in terms of wages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Hark at the jealous Mackem, man. Probably even more pissed off because they aren't getting a mention on transfer day. That's because we've done good business already. We have a stronger squad now than we did three weeks ago and have even more wedge in the bank to be thrown around in the summer. £30m for someone with less than 20 PL goals ffs. The world's gone mad. If Bent didn't hand in a transfer request, at what price would you have said sell? I bet it would have been a lot more than what he went for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Hark at the jealous Mackem, man. Probably even more pissed off because they aren't getting a mention on transfer day. That's because we've done good business already. We have a stronger squad now than we did three weeks ago and have even more wedge in the bank to be thrown around in the summer. £30m for someone with less than 20 PL goals ffs. The world's gone mad. Rooney only had 15 goals for Everton before Man Utd signed him for £25m (?), and that was 7 years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts