Robster Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Winning at the Emirates would give them one hell of a confidence boost, though. Probably wont matter now anyway 1-1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest quklaani Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 He were only the three feet ahead of every other player on the pitch, guess that's not quite enough for the linesman. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger needs a good kicking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger needs a good kicking. Someone needs to kick his arse right to the Newcastle dugout. Best manager in the world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger needs a good kicking. Someone needs to kick his arse right to the Newcastle dugout. Best manager in the world. Let's not get carried away.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Phil Brown 'Fabregas spat at Brian Horton' 'Wengar didnt shake my hand he didnt when we beat them here early in the season' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 I'd pay any amount of money for five minutes in a room with Phil Brown and a baseball bat. Utter cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Arsenal are a horrible club anyway. Never bought into this, "but they play attractive football" sh*te. Gallas, Eboue, Adebayor, Fabregas...team's a bunch of c*nts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger is very petty they won it with an offside goal and he is in a huff , but I hate Brown he is a complete wanker and is great to see Hull go out of the cup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger's a bigger prick than Brown tbf. He's been shown the replay of the goal, and not only does he deny it was offside...but that Gallas was pushed too... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger needs a good kicking. Someone needs to kick his arse right to the Newcastle dugout. Best manager in the world. He's blatantly not though is he? He's also a massive twat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridman Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3364/gallaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Embarrassing decision that. The ruled out Hull goal in the first half was much closer, but that the same linesman did see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 I wouldn't shake Phil Browns hand either, the bloke is a prize cocksmith & if the MAGS who battered him years ago at SJP are on here all I can say is RESPECT going out to you. Wegner is petty, stroppy & a bad loser but hey that's what being French is all about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Makes sense when you put it like that. I'm still not sure this active-inactive thing is very clear though and anything that upsets Phil Brown is fine by me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? I called offside when I saw it live, ridiculous decision. And where was the advantage to the attacking team in the first half? That one was only inches in it with the players running in opposite directions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Makes sense when you put it like that. I'm still not sure this active-inactive thing is very clear though and anything that upsets Phil Brown is fine by me. Good, I was almost confusing myself when I wrote it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? I called offside when I saw it live, ridiculous decision. And where was the advantage to the attacking team in the first half? That one was only inches in it with the players running in opposite directions. "Inches" Barmby was so clearly offside, the calls werent comparable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustynrg Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Anyone who upsets Phil "sit on the field while I slag you off in front of the fans and look like big man" Brown is Ok in my book. And he's Allardyce's best mate, and he wears ridiculous dandruff jackets, what's there to like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Yeah but that's easily interfering with play. IMO the decision was right at the time, Gallas was no interference at all to the phase of play, yes when the ball was kicked but play was ahead of him. The rule after that is supposed to stand is if it hits off an opposing player then it won't be offside. Good call i reckon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest quklaani Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? I called offside when I saw it live, ridiculous decision. I thought the ref had blown because the Hull players all seemed to stop, which was understandable if utterly stupid. He's so far offside he's off...twice, or something. If you know what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatTheFunk Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 phil brown is a prize cunt and a knob jockey of the highest order Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts