Optimistic Nut Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger's a bigger prick than Brown tbf. He's been shown the replay of the goal, and not only does he deny it was offside...but that Gallas was pushed too... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Wenger needs a good kicking. Someone needs to kick his arse right to the Newcastle dugout. Best manager in the world. He's blatantly not though is he? He's also a massive twat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridman Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3364/gallaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Embarrassing decision that. The ruled out Hull goal in the first half was much closer, but that the same linesman did see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 I wouldn't shake Phil Browns hand either, the bloke is a prize cocksmith & if the MAGS who battered him years ago at SJP are on here all I can say is RESPECT going out to you. Wegner is petty, stroppy & a bad loser but hey that's what being French is all about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Makes sense when you put it like that. I'm still not sure this active-inactive thing is very clear though and anything that upsets Phil Brown is fine by me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? I called offside when I saw it live, ridiculous decision. And where was the advantage to the attacking team in the first half? That one was only inches in it with the players running in opposite directions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Makes sense when you put it like that. I'm still not sure this active-inactive thing is very clear though and anything that upsets Phil Brown is fine by me. Good, I was almost confusing myself when I wrote it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? I called offside when I saw it live, ridiculous decision. And where was the advantage to the attacking team in the first half? That one was only inches in it with the players running in opposite directions. "Inches" Barmby was so clearly offside, the calls werent comparable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustynrg Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Anyone who upsets Phil "sit on the field while I slag you off in front of the fans and look like big man" Brown is Ok in my book. And he's Allardyce's best mate, and he wears ridiculous dandruff jackets, what's there to like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Devil's advocate time, it's interesting, it is offside, at least it should be, and I'd be shouting blue murder if that happened to us but when the ball leaves the head of the Arsenal player (Djourou?), is Gallas "active"? If Myhill doesn't get a touch, the ball wouldn't have looped to Gallas so how can he be active at that point? If it had gone in off the first Arsenal head, let's say, it would have been allowed - so it is only the goalkeeper's interference that allows Gallas to head in, meaning that it is legal because the last touch was from a Hull player? Doesn't matter. If someone shoots from 30 yards out towards the left side of the goal, and another player is in an offside position on the other side of the goal and the goalkeeper saves it but only as far as the offside player and he taps it in, it's still offside. Yeah but that's easily interfering with play. IMO the decision was right at the time, Gallas was no interference at all to the phase of play, yes when the ball was kicked but play was ahead of him. The rule after that is supposed to stand is if it hits off an opposing player then it won't be offside. Good call i reckon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest quklaani Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 At the end of the day, it was offside, but look at the replys we had to see. Advantage to the attacking team. And meh, we all hate Phil Brown, why cant Wenger? I called offside when I saw it live, ridiculous decision. I thought the ref had blown because the Hull players all seemed to stop, which was understandable if utterly stupid. He's so far offside he's off...twice, or something. If you know what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatTheFunk Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 phil brown is a prize cunt and a knob jockey of the highest order Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Anyone who upsets Phil "sit on the field while I slag you off in front of the fans and look like big man" Brown is Ok in my book. And he's Allardyce's best mate, and he wears ridiculous dandruff jackets, what's there to like? The fake tan to rival David Dickinson? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 ...and he wears ridiculous dandruff jackets, what's there to like? :lol: I was laughing at it watchin MOTD, did he jus step out from 1985 or somethin? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Jesus christ 35, are you serious?! Pardew's wikipedia: In March 2009, on Match of the Day 2 Pardew was condemned for implying that Chelsea midfielder Michael Essien had "absolutely rape(d)" Man City player Ched Evans during a midfield tussle for the ball.[27] Throughout the programme, Pardew was reported to have been in a state of frenzied rage, with bloodshot eyes and a white froth lining the outside of his mouth apparent as he uttered the phrase. The BBC have insisted there will be no on-air apology, despite 35 viewer complaints, insisting it had been misheard as "rakes", and expressing no certainty that Pardew would ever appear on the show again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Phil Brown seems to be losing it at the moment. He seemed rattled before the game with us, and now he's blaming Wenger for decisions made by the ref. Methinks he's a worried man, and all this won't help his players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Phil Brown seems to be losing it at the moment. He seemed rattled before the game with us, and now he's blaming Wenger for decisions made by the ref. Methinks he's a worried man, and all this won't help his players. you heard him on the radio? hes shitting himself and generally making a right tit of himself http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7950507.stm cringe-tastic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Phil Brown seems to be losing it at the moment. He seemed rattled before the game with us, and now he's blaming Wenger for decisions made by the ref. Methinks he's a worried man, and all this won't help his players. you heard him on the radio? hes shitting himself and generally making a right tit of himself http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7950507.stm cringe-tastic at what stage of the insanity process do you realise you're insane? i'm guessing it's not long after you're sitting ridiculing another teams manager in march 2009 as a newcastle supporter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Phil Brown seems to be losing it at the moment. He seemed rattled before the game with us, and now he's blaming Wenger for decisions made by the ref. Methinks he's a worried man, and all this won't help his players. you heard him on the radio? hes shitting himself and generally making a right tit of himself http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7950507.stm cringe-tastic at what stage of the insanity process do you realise you're insane? i'm guessing it's not long after you're sitting ridiculing another teams manager in march 2009 as a newcastle supporter What? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Phil Brown seems to be losing it at the moment. He seemed rattled before the game with us, and now he's blaming Wenger for decisions made by the ref. Methinks he's a worried man, and all this won't help his players. you heard him on the radio? hes shitting himself and generally making a right tit of himself http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7950507.stm cringe-tastic at what stage of the insanity process do you realise you're insane? i'm guessing it's not long after you're sitting ridiculing another teams manager in march 2009 as a newcastle supporter What? read Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 He sounds like he's running around ready to just explode and rip someone's head off. He's taking everything from the reporters as criticism Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts