Dokko Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. oh hes found an escape route for the Ashley bummers ;D I'm happy its over for the club. I'm happy the amount was minimal. I'm hoping that we can now sell the club without this over our head. You are happy that KK was right. Well done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 So it turns out that he did try and get £25m... Damn right......should take Newcastle United for as much as possible...... start high in a tribunral! Fixed your post. Couldnt care less, NUFC will still be there, long after ashley of KK. What exactley should keegan have done then? I'm not going to get into what I think he should have done. Because firstly I'm still not even sure what he did go for and how serious he was about the £25m and secondly I wasn't aiming my post at Keegan. I was just trying to point out to you that Ashley isn't the one who would have been lumbered with the £25m fee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Agreed. Although I think those using that argument are merely attempting to save face. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Well then I'll have to disagree. Think he should have put the club first, especially in the state we're in. Either way it's over now, would be nice if we can all just put this all behind us and concentrate on getting promoted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Well then I'll have to disagree. Think he should have put the club first, especially in the state we're in. Either way it's over now, would be nice if we can all just put this all behind us and concentrate on getting promoted. FWIW, a price of £2m seems reasonable in order to discover the truth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Well then I'll have to disagree. Think he should have put the club first, especially in the state we're in. Either way it's over now, would be nice if we can all just put this all behind us and concentrate on getting promoted. FWIW, a price of £2m seems reasonable in order to discover the truth. What about £25m? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Well then I'll have to disagree. Think he should have put the club first, especially in the state we're in. Either way it's over now, would be nice if we can all just put this all behind us and concentrate on getting promoted. FWIW, a price of £2m seems reasonable in order to discover the truth. Aye I have no problem with him getting £2m, just the fact that he supposedly went for £25m that doesn't sit right with me. Could have really screwed us over had it gone through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Well then I'll have to disagree. Think he should have put the club first, especially in the state we're in. Either way it's over now, would be nice if we can all just put this all behind us and concentrate on getting promoted. FWIW, a price of £2m seems reasonable in order to discover the truth. What about £25m? Pff... What's £25m? Enough to buy 4 or 5 S. American players no one's ever fucking seen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Well then I'll have to disagree. Think he should have put the club first, especially in the state we're in. Either way it's over now, would be nice if we can all just put this all behind us and concentrate on getting promoted. Shearer loves the club, should he have worked for free to stop the club going down? Should Taylor be working for free to take us back up? It'd be nice, but it's a mental idea to think it could happen. OK was fucked over, the fact the club were in a bad state doesn't lessen his entitlement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 KK vindicated. Was this ever in doubt? i couldn't believe people were doubting the man and taking Ashley's side in this case. There was a third side, the club itself, which some people felt more important than either Keegan or Ashley. It's hard to understand I know, everything has to be black and white for some. This. Future of the Club >>>> Who was right or wrong in the Keegan/Ashley stuff Unless you're Keegan, that is: in which case you've been accused from all sides of being a spineless dummy-chucker who eats babies for supper. I think I'm missing your point, what does the fact that KK's been attacked a lot over the last few months have to do with the fact that the club should be before any legal squabbles? From a fan's perspective, aye, but people who claim KK shouldn't have gone through with the case for the club's benefit are living on the fucking moon. Well then I'll have to disagree. Think he should have put the club first, especially in the state we're in. Either way it's over now, would be nice if we can all just put this all behind us and concentrate on getting promoted. Shearer loves the club, should he have worked for free to stop the club going down? Should Taylor be working for free to take us back up? It'd be nice, but it's a mental idea to think it could happen. OK was fucked over, the fact the club were in a bad state doesn't lessen his entitlement. Shearer and Taylor aren't trying to get £25million in one go. Club being in a bad state doesn't lessen his entitlement, which is why I'm happy with him getting the £2m he deserves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 It is remarkable that some people have are all over the £25 million thing. Are people so glum not to realise that TEAM ASHLEY knew what was coming, so Lambias leaked the story of the club going into administration if KK had of got all the figures mentioned in the claim. Our chief creditor is Ashley himself what is going to do appoint administrators who then pay him 10p in the £ . As the report makes clear these people will do things that are "nothing more than an exercise in public relations" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Consortium of one Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I find it interesting that Keegan denied seeking 25M in compensation and yet the ruling states that he did, although it was not awarded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I find it interesting that Keegan denied seeking 25M in compensation and yet the ruling states that he did, although it was not awarded. Has he denied it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Just read through bits and bobs of it and have a question (baring in mind i don't really know how it all works): If Keegan was right all along and has won his case, why did he not win the alleged £9/10m he was after, but a mere £2m? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest aoliversaknob Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 It is remarkable that some people have are all over the £25 million thing. Are people so glum not to realise that TEAM ASHLEY knew what was coming, so Lambias leaked the story of the club going into administration if KK had of got all the figures mentioned in the claim. Our chief creditor is Ashley himself what is going to do appoint administrators who then pay him 10p in the £ . As the report makes clear these people will do things that are "nothing more than an exercise in public relations" Quality post Spence - this thread was being hijacked by people who couldnt see past there own noses.# Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Just read through bits and bobs of it and have a question (baring in mind i don't really know how it all works): If Keegan was right all along and has won his case, why did he not win the alleged £9/10m he was after, but a mere £2m? Because he was claiming for his wages until he was 65, and he was claiming for 'stigma damages' and I'm pretty sure he claimed a little extra to pay for a PS3, as he had nowt to do since they totally sacked him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 One thing I will say, is if we're going to discuss this can we at least do it like adults? The name calling and petty little jibes are getting a bit pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I wonder what that arsehole David Craig is about to peddle then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Just read through bits and bobs of it and have a question (baring in mind i don't really know how it all works): If Keegan was right all along and has won his case, why did he not win the alleged £9/10m he was after, but a mere £2m? Because he was claiming for his wages until he was 65, and he was claiming for 'stigma damages' and I'm pretty sure he claimed a little extra to pay for a PS3, as he had nowt to do since they totally sacked him. There is fella in here Quayside who has posted why the claim would be so high, check it out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I wonder what that arsehole David Craig is about to peddle then. It's all based around the 25m. Same with SSN's coverage. Trying to keep their 'sources' happy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gekkotime Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Just read through bits and bobs of it and have a question (baring in mind i don't really know how it all works): If Keegan was right all along and has won his case, why did he not win the alleged £9/10m he was after, but a mere £2m? He had a clause in his contract which stated that he'd be entitled to 2m if sacked, regardless when/how. He challenged that clause, the tribunal rejected his claim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I wonder what that arsehole David Craig is about to peddle then. All that clown mentions his Keegan wanting 25million. Where has all the talk of Keegan wanting Henry, Lampard and being mentally unstable gone, surely that should have been part of their defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now