Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Keggy for Southampton? Wouldn't rule Keegan out now you mention it. He'll fancy it. Club low down the league with money to burn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Don't know if this is region blocked, but some highlights from real Ronaldo's first game of the season. He looks fat, but not nearly as much as in those photos that surfaced a few weeks ago. http://www.marca.com/tv/?v=trU6G5zeXvP Tbf he's always been a bit stocky (not that much though). Is he still any good? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 I think his scoring record in Brazil is still quite good. EDIT: 13 in 22 according to wikipedia. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Southampton fans want O'Neill Rumours he was spotted at their last home game. Someone in the mould of Zola, a 'coach' and nothing more than that (as well as being Italian...), seems more realistic to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 5 shots, 4 goals conceded. Makes me wonder in which game Harper has made a save? Or does this header against Wolves that went of the post count? Hitting the post or bar counts as off-target. Can anyone remember the mass argument on GSS about this? Got really heated, the initial argument lasted about 10mins with Stelling trying to move it on but couldn't, then it was mentioned for about 6 months after. Was a totally different panel, when they used to chop and change all the time. Can't believe there's ever even a debate. The idea of an on-target shot is that it was going in before it was intercepted by a defender or the goalkeeper. Just because hitting the woodwork seems like a big chance or whatever doesn't mean that it's on-target. Has anyone ever thought that if it hits the post and goes out it should be a corner? I have, it seems fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatwax Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 5 shots, 4 goals conceded. Makes me wonder in which game Harper has made a save? Or does this header against Wolves that went of the post count? Hitting the post or bar counts as off-target. Can anyone remember the mass argument on GSS about this? Got really heated, the initial argument lasted about 10mins with Stelling trying to move it on but couldn't, then it was mentioned for about 6 months after. Was a totally different panel, when they used to chop and change all the time. Can't believe there's ever even a debate. The idea of an on-target shot is that it was going in before it was intercepted by a defender or the goalkeeper. Just because hitting the woodwork seems like a big chance or whatever doesn't mean that it's on-target. Has anyone ever thought that if it hits the post and goes out it should be a corner? I have, it seems fair. Thats a bit silly. Whats your thinking behind it out of interest, is the post part of the opposition? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest schmuck Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Even after years of watching football my natural reaction to the ball hitting the post and going out is still 'corner'. Not that I necessarily think it should be, but the instinctive part of my brain just won't learn the rules Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 5 shots, 4 goals conceded. Makes me wonder in which game Harper has made a save? Or does this header against Wolves that went of the post count? Hitting the post or bar counts as off-target. Can anyone remember the mass argument on GSS about this? Got really heated, the initial argument lasted about 10mins with Stelling trying to move it on but couldn't, then it was mentioned for about 6 months after. Was a totally different panel, when they used to chop and change all the time. Can't believe there's ever even a debate. The idea of an on-target shot is that it was going in before it was intercepted by a defender or the goalkeeper. Just because hitting the woodwork seems like a big chance or whatever doesn't mean that it's on-target. Has anyone ever thought that if it hits the post and goes out it should be a corner? I have, it seems fair. Thats a bit silly. Whats your thinking behind it out of interest, is the post part of the opposition? I just think because it's the frame of the goal it feels like there should be some kind of reward. When one of our players hits the bar and it goes out it's only a goal kick, but someone 30 yards away can kick it out and it's a corner. Obvious, of course. I'm not saying it should change, just that it seems fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Ok you get a quarter of a goal every time you hit the bar but it's only counted once you have hit it 4 times. How good would that be? Plenty of shots being taken from all over the place. Ok it would be shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Used to love this site when used to get updated http://www.officialplayersites.com/players/ Used to have stacks of players on it in its heyday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 The authorities should check if any of the Pakistani cricketers confiscated telephones have had calls from numbers that also have contacted Tevez last week also. How else can you explain that miss and Sunderlands win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 5 shots, 4 goals conceded. Makes me wonder in which game Harper has made a save? Or does this header against Wolves that went of the post count? Hitting the post or bar counts as off-target. Can anyone remember the mass argument on GSS about this? Got really heated, the initial argument lasted about 10mins with Stelling trying to move it on but couldn't, then it was mentioned for about 6 months after. Was a totally different panel, when they used to chop and change all the time. Can't believe there's ever even a debate. The idea of an on-target shot is that it was going in before it was intercepted by a defender or the goalkeeper. Just because hitting the woodwork seems like a big chance or whatever doesn't mean that it's on-target. Has anyone ever thought that if it hits the post and goes out it should be a corner? I have, it seems fair. I can understand that, but wouldn't want it to happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Re: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/brighton/8954601.stm Hope he gets some decent experience of first-team football there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Shef Wed fan in a critical but stable condition following violence after they thrashed Hartlepool 5-0. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-11129586 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 bad shit that like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Blackburn Bidder's Firm Shut Down http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11129127 I was quite looking forward to seeing the fat cunt spunk £100M on a few Alan Smith's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 What Sam Allardyce would have done with 100m is something that deserved to be seen, imho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jonnyameobi Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 What Sam Allardyce would have done with 100m is something that deserved to be seen, imho. without a doubt, he could have 7 different squads full of shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Stumbled on this classic JFK forgot how good it was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 Tbf Simon Bird is a cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 At least post the uncensored one: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 I wonder who was next if Kinnear turned the job down? Another "remember the 90's?" appointment, doubtless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 i wish if this was caught on camera! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 I wonder who was next if Kinnear turned the job down? Another "remember the 90's?" appointment, doubtless. George Graham had to be in with a shout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 30, 2010 Share Posted August 30, 2010 I wonder who was next if Kinnear turned the job down? Another "remember the 90's?" appointment, doubtless. George Graham had to be in with a shout. My mackem brother-in-law phoned me to say 'big Joe's got your fucking job' and I instantly though he meant Joe Royle, that would have been bad enough but Joe Kinnear man. I'll never forget the belly-laugh he let out when he told me it was indeed Kinnear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts