Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest NobbyOhNobby

But that's where it becomes Premier League specific and over the duration of time spent playing in that league.

 

Arjen Robben was class for Chelsea, but played 3 seasons.

 

Jaap Stam was class, but played played 3 seasons.

 

You look at the players being mentioned, and they played the majority of their careers (and certainly at their absolute peak) in the premier league.

 

The likes of Xabi Alonso and Michael Essien are obviously excellent players, but Alonso didn't play in the league for long enough and Essien had two good seasons before being destroyed by injury. In contrast, Keane and Gerrard became premier league legends over a sustained period of time. Similarly Lampard and Scholes fall into that bracket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree. His passing over short and long range was (and to some extent still is) outstanding. Thing is with Lampard, at Chelsea he was always the most important player, but he was still ultimately a cog in a world class machine of players. He rarely had to 'take games by the scruff of the neck'.

That would wash except for the elephant in the room that he never took games by the scruff of the neck for England either. His short passing is as any Premiership midfielders short passing is. My opinion is were it not for his  goalscoring ability, Frank Lampard would be a nondescript, run of the mill player.

 

Except he's statistically created more chances than any other player in the history of the PL (except perhaps for Giggs?). Nondescript indeed. :lol:

 

Two things we'll never agree on, Bill. Politics and Frank Lampard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Drogba over Henry? Bahahahahaa.  Even Drogba over van Nistelrooy is laughable enough.       

 

Not sure if anyone picked him over Henry but even you have the sense to acknowledge Drogba was a far superior all-round footballer to Ruud. As goalscorers Van Nistelrooj has the edge, certainly, but he benefited from taking penalties and having no real responsibility barring putting the ball in the net.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

A non-descript run of the mill player that scores isn't the linchpin of a side consistently challenges for the title, that's Kevin Nolan, not Frank Lampard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lampard - It's not just "goal scoring" though is it. It's not like he's just scoring tap-ins after staying in the box all game which is a skill in itself. He makes such intelligent runs. He's not so great in that middle - possession hogging passage but he's brilliant at finding chance-creating passes. Look at the goals scored against Barcelona when they won the CL. Two delightful balls to Ramires on the counter. Not to mention all the actual assist Lampard has.

 

Fabregas is every bit as good imo. Better at different things though.

 

I actually think Silva is better than Fabregas. Fabregas is very much a PL player and has to play as such. Silva is tactically flexible but equally as effective. He often controls games coming from wide. Everything goes through him.

 

Drogba is above RVN comfortably. It's actually laughable to say RVN is above Drogba. RVN was a brilliant goalscorer - that's it. Drogba is/was a true leader for the team. And it's not like it was thrust upon him - he's just that type of big character. His all round game would make RVN embarrassed. In fact, the Didier Drogba lone man helped to take the game away from the RVN style poachers. Those teams would get outplayed. The great SAF Man United sides happened either side of RVN and it's no coincidence imo. The team after RVN often played without a #9 out and out striker type.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree. His passing over short and long range was (and to some extent still is) outstanding. Thing is with Lampard, at Chelsea he was always the most important player, but he was still ultimately a cog in a world class machine of players. He rarely had to 'take games by the scruff of the neck'.

That would wash except for the elephant in the room that he never took games by the scruff of the neck for England either. His short passing is as any Premiership midfielders short passing is. My opinion is were it not for his  goalscoring ability, Frank Lampard would be a nondescript, run of the mill player.

 

Except he's statistically created more chances than any other player in the history of the PL (except perhaps for Giggs?). Nondescript indeed. :lol:

 

Two things we'll never agree on, Bill. Politics and Frank Lampard.

He's third behind Giggs and Gerrard.

 

According to statbunker anyhow.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone watching Question of Sport, penatly right in the top corner :lol: still got it.

 

loved Phil Neville and Trevor Sinclair not wanting to follow it :lol:

 

Phil Neville bottling it just like in Euro 2000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...