Nobody Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Fuck off, there's no way Gardner cost £6m. Could have been worse, they could have got a really out of his depth foreigner. Someone like Cabaye. No they couldn't, he would have seen SJP on the flight over there and said that he would rather sign for whoever plays there Did Gardner really cost £6m? Way to get rid of that that ridiculous amount of money the got for Henderson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=631296&page=2 post #15, they're threatening to fight each other now http://i.imgur.com/0CaXj.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Gardner cost more than Tiote. Discuss. Done, end of discussion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Wearside won't come on, man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taps01 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Gardner cost more than Tiote. Discuss. Best and Ba = £1 million Wickham and Ji = £10 million Brilliant keep them coming! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Gardner and Elmohathardon cost the same as Cheeky and the Dreamboat. Discuss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 What I would genuinely worry about if I was a mackem was that two of their most heralded signings at the back have come from Man Utd and are both over 30. They do have quality still but they're only going one way. Possibly even more important than that though is that during all those years at one of the best clubs in the world, they've won the lot. Sure they'll have professional pride and at the moment want to prove that they can still cut it - albeit at a lower calibre club - but deep down, do they really give a fuck if Sunderland are poor? Likewise their number one striker, who's on loan and has a massive ego by all accounts. Even if he does end up being a success, surely he'll believe he can get a better move? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 My god. The whole fucking first page with shit from the game. They're like: Clean and stylish forum with less than 50 threads on one game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=631296&page=2 post #15, they're threatening to fight each other now http://i.imgur.com/0CaXj.gif Brilliant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 What I would genuinely worry about if I was a mackem was that two of their most heralded signings at the back have come from Man Utd and are both over 30. They do have quality still but they're only going one way. Possibly even more important than that though is that during all those years at one of the best clubs in the world, they've won the lot. Sure they'll have professional pride and at the moment want to prove that they can still cut it - albeit at a lower calibre club - but deep down, do they really give a fuck if Sunderland are poor? Likewise their number one striker, who's on loan and has a massive ego by all accounts. Even if he does nd up being a success, surely he'll believe he can get a better move? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Seriously howling at the mackem offering other mackems on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 But, but, but teh medals!?! http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=631409 Oh wait, you mean you take a decent player out of an extremely talented squad and drop him in some mediocre dross with nothing to play for and they get exposed as being a much lesser player? WELL I NEVER. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taps01 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=631296&page=2 post #15, they're threatening to fight each other now http://i.imgur.com/0CaXj.gif Brilliant They really are a different breed! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 The mackems might be candidates for the drop man. Would be hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Bruce's post-match email: It was obviously a frustrating night for us, I have to say. If there's one thing I like to pride myself on, its my teams being well organised defensively. So obviously it was disappointing to give two bad goals away. On another night, we might have got the first goal and then its a totally different game. But once we went two down, it was always going to be hard to get back into it. Then Kieran gets a great goal, thats what he is capable of. When you look at him doing things like that, theres no reason why he cant go on to be England's left back. We might even have nicked a point, and that would have been a decent result, but in the end we just fell short. We left it late to get the goal, thats for sure. If theres one thing I cant hold against the lads, its their workrate. But at the moment we are still trying to gel, which was always going to be the case with so many new signings. It was always going to take more than 6 games to achieve that. We just need to have the character to deal with the pressure and expectation that goes with playing for this football club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 The mackems might be candidates for the drop man. Would be hilarious. Nah. Edit: about them being candidates. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=631296&page=2 post #15, they're threatening to fight each other now http://i.imgur.com/0CaXj.gif Brilliant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Bruce's post-match email: It was obviously a frustrating night for us, I have to say. If there's one thing I like to pride myself on, its my teams being well organised defensively. So obviously it was disappointing to give two bad goals away. On another night, we might have got the first goal and then its a totally different game. But once we went two down, it was always going to be hard to get back into it. Then Kieran gets a great goal, thats what he is capable of. When you look at him doing things like that, theres no reason why he cant go on to be England's left back. We might even have nicked a point, and that would have been a decent result, but in the end we just fell short. We left it late to get the goal, thats for sure. If theres one thing I cant hold against the lads, its their workrate. But at the moment we are still trying to gel, which was always going to be the case with so many new signings. It was always going to take more than 6 games to achieve that. We just need to have the character to deal with the pressure and expectation that goes with playing for this football club. "Date sent 20:05 26/09/2011". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 They needed wingers and they needed full backs. They got neither, instead a collection of shit, slow midfielders. I'm sure their needs are clear to all but Brucey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ykmkmdd Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Shit like this just has to be a spoof, has to be! http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=631477 That's right folks - we're the deluded ones..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Bruce's post-match email: It was obviously a frustrating night for us, I have to say. If there's one thing I like to pride myself on, its my teams being well organised defensively. So obviously it was disappointing to give two bad goals away. On another night, we might have got the first goal and then its a totally different game. But once we went two down, it was always going to be hard to get back into it. Then Kieran gets a great goal, thats what he is capable of. When you look at him doing things like that, theres no reason why he cant go on to be England's left back. We might even have nicked a point, and that would have been a decent result, but in the end we just fell short. We left it late to get the goal, thats for sure. If theres one thing I cant hold against the lads, its their workrate. But at the moment we are still trying to gel, which was always going to be the case with so many new signings. It was always going to take more than 6 games to achieve that. We just need to have the character to deal with the pressure and expectation that goes with playing for this football club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 That bit about Kieran Richardson in that email Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I wouldn't take one of their players for our first XI, and I honestly mean that. Cracks me the fuck up that I'd only take O'Shea to take a full back spot right now, yet it'd still be our weakest position that needs replacing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 What I would genuinely worry about if I was a mackem was that two of their most heralded signings at the back have come from Man Utd and are both over 30. They do have quality still but they're only going one way. Possibly even more important than that though is that during all those years at one of the best clubs in the world, they've won the lot. Sure they'll have professional pride and at the moment want to prove that they can still cut it - albeit at a lower calibre club - but deep down, do they really give a fuck if Sunderland are poor? Likewise their number one striker, who's on loan and has a massive ego by all accounts. Even if he does nd up being a success, surely he'll believe he can get a better move? For all the fair criticism of our transfer policy, one thing I am definitely in agreement with which I have said before is not using loans to fill key positions. It's a very small time way to put a team together. We used the loan system perfectly in the Championship season, when Hughton brought in several players as short term cover and/or to give us a bit of experience of the division (Harewood, van Aanholt, Fitz Hall). With all the money Bruce has had, to keep building a team around loans is absolutely fucking stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taps01 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 The mackems might be candidates for the drop man. Would be hilarious. They will grind out results against the poorer teams at home. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts