Guest thenorthumbrian Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 That is a hell of a transfer profit in the time Ashley has had ownership of the club. During the same period the support has held up well, the wage bill has been slashed and from next season United will be back to recieving substantial TV payments. The amount made available for incoming transfers should be reasonably good, 25 million or so at a rough guess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 TN, where did you get this from. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakka Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 same source as the "rough guess" ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 same source as the "rough guess" ? Alan Olivers pond of knowledge? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 This will end well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 it'll be wide of the mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 ambition back the manager thick mick mackems.gif soopa mike etc etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 That is a hell of a transfer profit in the time Ashley has had ownership of the club. During the same period the support has held up well, the wage bill has been slashed and from next season United will be back to recieving substantial TV payments. The amount made available for incoming transfers should be reasonably good, 25 million or so at a rough guess. Corporate Finance, brought to you in association with the Beano. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 That is a hell of a transfer profit in the time Ashley has had ownership of the club. That is a hell of a load of rubbish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCONA Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 anything he's "earnt" from transfers, times that by ten and thats how much he's lost clearing our debt and cost of relegation Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jonlane86 Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 anything he's "earnt" from transfers, times that by ten and thats how much he's lost clearing our debt and cost of relegation this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 The source and numbers backing this up will be revealed some time next week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 That is a hell of a transfer profit in the time Ashley has had ownership of the club. During the same period the support has held up well, the wage bill has been slashed and from next season United will be back to recieving substantial TV payments. The amount made available for incoming transfers should be reasonably good, 25 million or so at a rough guess. Corporate Finance, brought to you in association with the Beano. £7m a week profit I heard? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Amazing no one bought the club last season when these sort of profits were to be had in just two years. Mark Fenwick must be kicking himself today as things have turned out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 He's gone from a £30m loss to a £60m profit in two years during which time we were relegated and lost £50m in revenue? Amazing that like, some would say its completely unbelievable and in fact total bollocks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quayside Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 To be fair the thread title only refers to transfer profits - not the losses the club as a whole has made. Even so I'm struggling to see where a figure like £60 million comes from. Anyone know how that has been calculated? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Someone get adding on the casio http://nufc.com/2009-10html/transfers.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Didn't realise he was talking about transfers since nowt is mentioned about that in the title. That's almost worse really since we can all see how much has been spent and brought in through transfers (within a few million either way anyway). We've brought in about £75m from transfers and spent about £56m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Didn't realise he was talking about transfers since nowt is mentioned about that in the title. That's almost worse really since we can all see how much has been spent and brought in through transfers (within a few million either way anyway). We've brought in about £75m from transfers and spent about £56m. It would be stupid to look at a transfer profit in isolation, even if we had made £60 million. Threads like this just make people look daft when they start them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 I haven't got a fucking clue what this thread is about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 I haven't got a f***ing clue what this thread is about. I don't think you're in the minority. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Don't bother to work it out, its not worth it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 we could use some clarification alright otherwise i shall believe this is garbage Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now