Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Let's not forget the loveable, 'appy, cheeky chappy personality. That's you fucked, Dave.

 

:okay:

 

http://thefc100.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/redknapp.jpg

 

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01678/Harry_Redknapp_1678457c.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it is ok to pay no tax as long as you blatantly place it in an off shore account under your pets name.

You couldnt make it up.

 

 

So long as you act like a retard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder what I should call my perfectly legal offshore bank account?

Pick the name of your first pet and your first house number, or something.

Dino31 for me, not bad.

Nah. Do the porn name thing.

Mine is going to be Benjy Bailey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

I don't understand if it was all innocent and above board, why the account was under his dog's name rather than his own.

 

Obviously neither did the thick fuckers on the jury.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Brazilianbob

The jury had no choice.  The judge has practically directed them to find a not guilty verdict.  The last time I was on a jury the Judge  told us in his summing up that if there was any doubt whatsoever in our minds as to the defendants guilt, then we were duty bound to find him innocent!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to know more details but my inclination is that they would have argued that the account represented a foreign investment, so it was not bound by UK tax law, and/or it was a business, not personal account (businesses can be called anything really, so Rosie 47 could be included), so subject to corporation tax, not income tax, which has much bigger tax reliefs (most of the amount put in there would likely not be chargeable at all if this was the case). However, my knowledge is limited and I don't know details of offshore accounts, and I also think there would be an issue with the evidential burden.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

chris_kammy: Great result 4Harry Redknapp, what a waste of our money taking him to court in the first place, no sense when such a low figure involved!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...