Jump to content

Not worthy of a thread - 2018 FIFA World Cup edition


Recommended Posts

Filipe Luis has broken his fibula. Third chance to go to a World Cup and now he most probably won't ever get to play one. In 2010 he was the 3rd choice left back and same in 2014. Feel so bad for him.

 

What ever happened to Gabigol?

 

Back to Brazil. Never been that good. Failed at Benfica and Inter. Was actually sent off in the first half last night in the Libertadores.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Filipe Luis has broken his fibula. Third chance to go to a World Cup and now he most probably won't ever get to play one. In 2010 he was the 3rd choice left back and same in 2014. Feel so bad for him.

 

What ever happened to Gabigol?

 

Back to Brazil. Never been that good. Failed at Benfica and Inter. Was actually sent off in the first half last night in the Libertadores.

 

He’s only 21 :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen random highlights of England 6-0 San Marino. Had no idea David Platt missed an injury-time penalty to equal Malcolm McDonald's England record of 5 in a game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tons of good friendlies today. Last time for a lot of players to prove they belong in the squad for the WC. Especially interested in Argentina v Italy. Sampaoli leaving Dybala and Icardi off the squad because issues they've had with Messi (he's not going to admit that himself) but also because they have a very interesting player called Lautaro Martinez who has been very good this season for Racing Club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A World Cup final getting decided by VAR  :scared:

 

Any worse than being decided by a completely wrong decision by a human?

 

SkySports released some data recently; in making decisions - VAR has an accuracy of 98.8% and referees have an accuracy of 99.2%.

 

Assistant referees are at 98%. Is it worth slowly our game down to a ridiculous mess like rugby to improve assistant referee’s decision making by 0.8%?

 

The man in the middle

 

According to the PGMO (Professional Game Match Officials), Premier League referees make on average 245 decisions, almost three times more than average player touches ball (90). That's one decision every 22 seconds.

 

Sixty of these decisions are technical (goal kicks, corners, throw ins), leaving 185 decisions to judge physical conduct or disciplinary actions.

 

Of those 185, 28 are visible decisions where action is taken (fouls, restarts), and 157 are non-visible, where play continues.

 

Refs make on average two mistakes per game. Meaning they are correct 99.2 per cent of the time.

 

Assistant referees

 

Many supporters would struggle to give the name of a single assistant referee in the Premier League, but the outcome of a game can hinge on their decisions.

 

Assistants make an average of 110 judgements, including offside technical and disciplinary decisions.

 

Just 39 of these are pure offside decisions, with just five of these resulting in an offside flag going up. Their accuracy is on average 98 per cent.

 

Summary of VAR experiment results (IFAB)

 

972 competitive matches in more than 20 associations and competitions

Accuracy of final decision with VAR is 98.8%

Link to post
Share on other sites

A World Cup final getting decided by VAR  :scared:

 

Any worse than being decided by a completely wrong decision by a human?

 

SkySports released some data recently; in making decisions - VAR has an accuracy of 98.8% and referees have an accuracy of 99.2%.

 

Assistant referees are at 98%. Is it worth slowly our game down to a ridiculous mess like rugby to improve assistant referee’s decision making by 0.8%?

 

The man in the middle

 

According to the PGMO (Professional Game Match Officials), Premier League referees make on average 245 decisions, almost three times more than average player touches ball (90). That's one decision every 22 seconds.

 

Sixty of these decisions are technical (goal kicks, corners, throw ins), leaving 185 decisions to judge physical conduct or disciplinary actions.

 

Of those 185, 28 are visible decisions where action is taken (fouls, restarts), and 157 are non-visible, where play continues.

 

Refs make on average two mistakes per game. Meaning they are correct 99.2 per cent of the time.

 

Assistant referees

 

Many supporters would struggle to give the name of a single assistant referee in the Premier League, but the outcome of a game can hinge on their decisions.

 

Assistants make an average of 110 judgements, including offside technical and disciplinary decisions.

 

Just 39 of these are pure offside decisions, with just five of these resulting in an offside flag going up. Their accuracy is on average 98 per cent.

 

Summary of VAR experiment results (IFAB)

 

972 competitive matches in more than 20 associations and competitions

Accuracy of final decision with VAR is 98.8%

 

:lol: So refs get a sample size of every single decision, where as VAR gets a sample of only-the-most-contentious-decisions, and we're supposed to think they're comparable numbers?

 

In fact, in the VAR review that the 98.8% figure is taken from, they state that:

 

"The accuracy of reviewable decisions has increased by 5.8% to

98.8%. 100% accuracy is impossible due to human perception and

subjectivity in decision-making"

 

I however do not know why they spaced their PDF like that :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s a sample size based on comparable decision to what VAR makes - so it is comparable.

 

It is but its ridiculous as it only is used to correct contentious decisions.

 

And them decisions are the ones that make the biggest impact on games

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want technology, I completely agree that referees are good enough.

 

Those stats are slightly misleading though aren't they? Because in theory the VAR 98.8% only applies to the 0.7% that the ref is unsure about.

"Slightly misleading" is incredibly kind [emoji38]
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone with a valid railway ticket will be given free access to waiting lounges and RZD-owned hotels in the vicinity of the train stations during the tournament. So anyone who plans to save money on hotels and stuff can still take a shower and use a restroom not attached to a fastfood chain. Always a nice thing.

 

Last time I checked, all but two stadiums are done, the rest will be finished in early April. My personal favourite is the one in Nizhni Novgorod - purely for the scenery and the fact that you are a short cab ride away from the millions of fantastic nastoikas. Messi vs the Croats, cannae wait.

 

Several hotel owners and airlines have been politely requested to stop ferking about with prices, but it remains to be seen if they will actually come back to their senses. But, to be fair, pretty much any big event anywhere causes greed to blow out of all proportions.

 

We got spanked by a half-arsed Brazil last night. Our defense is basically a bunch of misfits and guys who would not even make the team ten years ago. Fantastic stuff, if you're a fan of Egypt or Uruguay :lol: On the plus side, they did fix the stadium logistics at Luzhniki and nobody had to wait for an hour to leave the stadium, which became a bit of a problem after the Argentina friendly. Considering the traffic in Moscow, kind of a big deal. Good on us, I guess.

 

Any news on how many brilliant and eternally peaceful Western politicians will boycott? Not being sarcastic, just curious :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you’ve seen it but Egypt scored an absolutely belting goal last night. Really smooth football.

 

When the piggies played Liverpool there was like a ton of gifs about how Klopp instructed Salah to play against their defenders, some genuinely hilarious. At least three of their defenders can expect to be in our WC squad, so optimism is not exactly high. I know Egypt can play a bit. But Suarez and Cavani will have a field day if we play like yesterday. Akinfeev was the sole reason it did not end up with a tennis score.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen some of the reasons given by the Argentina coach why he didn't call up Icardi and Dybala [emoji38]

 

Can't see them going far this summer if the attitude holds.

Is it not just because they've been awful for Argentina?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't seem a good enough reason when the alternatives are far worse, good managers will find a way to make them play better instead of giving up them for far inferior players.

If he had a full qualification group over a few years I'd agree but he doesn't. The best players doesn't always make the best team. Argentina were much better in the last two qualifiers with that Benedetto bloke up front
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...