ElDiablo Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 Class. Alan Pardew man, get in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 No way Pilko. It's clearly going to be this man. http://www.alan-partridge.com/IMages/michael1.png I dunno who'd be harder to understand, him or Pedro. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 in the changing room before the game, he says he wants the players to develop a new goal celebration... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 He's even got a shit name. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 This is the most Kneejerktastic thread I have ever seen. it's all media speculation based on the odds bookies put out. Which came first: the media speculation or the bookies odds? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 madras you couldn't be more wrong and have seemingly underestimated the influence of the manager or i've correctly remembered the start of last season. the players played for him because they liked him, i also still remember nolan calling for a sub for tactical reasons and it was done minutes later. You haven't correctly remembered the start of the season at all and as I said, completely underestimated the influence of the manager in football. You've trotted out the same cliches that the Hughton haters used. Claiming we had the best squad in the division blah blah blah. Football isn't won on paper and most fans appreciate this. i said at the time we had the strongets squad, backed it at the bookies and won handsomely. football isn't won on paper, what does this mean ? surely you look at othet teams an assess them accordingly. You don't know what 'football isn't won on paper' means? Regardless of whether we had the best squad, Hughton still had to manage us out of the division and he did so with flying colours. We didn't have the third worst squad the division when we went down did we? But as I say, football isn't won in paper. had to manage us out the decision yet we were screaming at him to drop alan smith cos he was playing s***. He did manage us out of the division and he did drop Smith. Then, once he was given adequate funds he signed a replacement who is ten times the player Smith is. It's also interesting you point out that Smith was s*** because apparently our squad was so good we would've coasted the league with or without Hughton. Personally, I don't think you've made a very compelling argument and just seem to be attention seeking or something by discrediting Hughton's achievements at time like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 madras you couldn't be more wrong and have seemingly underestimated the influence of the manager or i've correctly remembered the start of last season. the players played for him because they liked him, i also still remember nolan calling for a sub for tactical reasons and it was done minutes later. You haven't correctly remembered the start of the season at all and as I said, completely underestimated the influence of the manager in football. You've trotted out the same cliches that the Hughton haters used. Claiming we had the best squad in the division blah blah blah. Football isn't won on paper and most fans appreciate this. i said at the time we had the strongets squad, backed it at the bookies and won handsomely. football isn't won on paper, what does this mean ? surely you look at othet teams an assess them accordingly. You don't know what 'football isn't won on paper' means? Regardless of whether we had the best squad, Hughton still had to manage us out of the division and he did so with flying colours. We didn't have the third worst squad the division when we went down did we? But as I say, football isn't won in paper. had to manage us out the decision yet we were screaming at him to drop alan smith cos he was playing s***. He did didn't he? 4, 5 month later ? While comfortably top, so what's your point? Take a look at our benches from last season up until January to find out why he played Smith. I hate Smith but f***ing hell, talk about twisting facts. "Fergie won the title with John O'Shea at left back, the useless c***" twisting facts....i was calling for smith to be dropped all season, many thought so too and in nolan, guthrie, barton.....smith came 4th. or does it mean he got everything right because we won the league ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 This is the most Kneejerktastic thread I have ever seen. it's all media speculation based on the odds bookies put out. Which came first: the media speculation or the bookies odds? odds Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 OFFICIAL www.nufc.co.uk/news/clubstatementpardew Is probably what it will look like when its announced Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 madras you couldn't be more wrong and have seemingly underestimated the influence of the manager or i've correctly remembered the start of last season. the players played for him because they liked him, i also still remember nolan calling for a sub for tactical reasons and it was done minutes later. You haven't correctly remembered the start of the season at all and as I said, completely underestimated the influence of the manager in football. You've trotted out the same cliches that the Hughton haters used. Claiming we had the best squad in the division blah blah blah. Football isn't won on paper and most fans appreciate this. i said at the time we had the strongets squad, backed it at the bookies and won handsomely. football isn't won on paper, what does this mean ? surely you look at othet teams an assess them accordingly. You don't know what 'football isn't won on paper' means? Regardless of whether we had the best squad, Hughton still had to manage us out of the division and he did so with flying colours. We didn't have the third worst squad the division when we went down did we? But as I say, football isn't won in paper. had to manage us out the decision yet we were screaming at him to drop alan smith cos he was playing s***. He did didn't he? 4, 5 month later ? While comfortably top, so what's your point? Take a look at our benches from last season up until January to find out why he played Smith. I hate Smith but f***ing hell, talk about twisting facts. "Fergie won the title with John O'Shea at left back, the useless c***" twisting facts....i was calling for smith to be dropped all season, many thought so too and in nolan, guthrie, barton.....smith came 4th. or does it mean he got everything right because we won the league ? Who said he got everything right madras you couldn't be more wrong and have seemingly underestimated the influence of the manager or i've correctly remembered the start of last season. the players played for him because they liked him, i also still remember nolan calling for a sub for tactical reasons and it was done minutes later. You haven't correctly remembered the start of the season at all and as I said, completely underestimated the influence of the manager in football. You've trotted out the same cliches that the Hughton haters used. Claiming we had the best squad in the division blah blah blah. Football isn't won on paper and most fans appreciate this. i said at the time we had the strongets squad, backed it at the bookies and won handsomely. football isn't won on paper, what does this mean ? surely you look at othet teams an assess them accordingly. You don't know what 'football isn't won on paper' means? Regardless of whether we had the best squad, Hughton still had to manage us out of the division and he did so with flying colours. We didn't have the third worst squad the division when we went down did we? But as I say, football isn't won in paper. had to manage us out the decision yet we were screaming at him to drop alan smith cos he was playing s***. He did didn't he? 4, 5 month later ? While comfortably top, so what's your point? Take a look at our benches from last season up until January to find out why he played Smith. I hate Smith but f***ing hell, talk about twisting facts. "Fergie won the title with John O'Shea at left back, the useless c***" twisting facts....i was calling for smith to be dropped all season, many thought so too and in nolan, guthrie, barton.....smith came 4th. or does it mean he got everything right because we won the league ? Once all four were fit Smith was fourth choice. What point are you making? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 If they appoint fucking Alan Pardew..... fuckshitcunt!! [/tourette] I was hoping Mike and Derek had learned something, but seems not, lost all faith in them... The apathy is getting to me tbh, just feel kind of empty now..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 madras you couldn't be more wrong and have seemingly underestimated the influence of the manager or i've correctly remembered the start of last season. the players played for him because they liked him, i also still remember nolan calling for a sub for tactical reasons and it was done minutes later. You haven't correctly remembered the start of the season at all and as I said, completely underestimated the influence of the manager in football. You've trotted out the same cliches that the Hughton haters used. Claiming we had the best squad in the division blah blah blah. Football isn't won on paper and most fans appreciate this. i said at the time we had the strongets squad, backed it at the bookies and won handsomely. football isn't won on paper, what does this mean ? surely you look at othet teams an assess them accordingly. You don't know what 'football isn't won on paper' means? Regardless of whether we had the best squad, Hughton still had to manage us out of the division and he did so with flying colours. We didn't have the third worst squad the division when we went down did we? But as I say, football isn't won in paper. had to manage us out the decision yet we were screaming at him to drop alan smith cos he was playing s***. He did manage us out of the division and he did drop Smith. Then, once he was given adequate fund he signed replacement who is ten times the player Smith is. It's also interesting you point out that Smith was s*** because apparently our squad was so good we would've coasted the league with or without Hughton. Personally, I don't think you've made a very compelling argument and just seem to be attention seeking or something by discrediting Hughton's achievements at time like this. just calling things as i see them, hughton done ok, but in my mind he started off with the strongest squad which always helps and there were still big questions over him this season aswell. edit...i never rated phil neville but knew that man utd were the best team in country when he was there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GAMMELL Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 The depths of stupidity this Ashley bastard falls too are absolutely incredible. When he installs this muppet Pardew I'll shed a fucking tear because I fear the worst all over again for the club. We just cannot shift this cunting cancerous owner away from our club can we? Hurts so god damn much seeing him dismantle the club bit by bit, I want to say more but I just can't bring myself to comment anymore.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 If Pardew's appointed, I'm done until MA is gone. In principle at least. I'm not sure if I'll be able to stay away, but I'll try. It'll be hard when I love all of our team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 madras you couldn't be more wrong and have seemingly underestimated the influence of the manager or i've correctly remembered the start of last season. the players played for him because they liked him, i also still remember nolan calling for a sub for tactical reasons and it was done minutes later. You haven't correctly remembered the start of the season at all and as I said, completely underestimated the influence of the manager in football. You've trotted out the same cliches that the Hughton haters used. Claiming we had the best squad in the division blah blah blah. Football isn't won on paper and most fans appreciate this. i said at the time we had the strongets squad, backed it at the bookies and won handsomely. football isn't won on paper, what does this mean ? surely you look at othet teams an assess them accordingly. You don't know what 'football isn't won on paper' means? Regardless of whether we had the best squad, Hughton still had to manage us out of the division and he did so with flying colours. We didn't have the third worst squad the division when we went down did we? But as I say, football isn't won in paper. had to manage us out the decision yet we were screaming at him to drop alan smith cos he was playing s***. He did didn't he? 4, 5 month later ? While comfortably top, so what's your point? Take a look at our benches from last season up until January to find out why he played Smith. I hate Smith but f***ing hell, talk about twisting facts. "Fergie won the title with John O'Shea at left back, the useless c***" twisting facts....i was calling for smith to be dropped all season, many thought so too and in nolan, guthrie, barton.....smith came 4th. or does it mean he got everything right because we won the league ? He did get everything right because he won the league. More right than that cunt Pardew with his Mascherano/Teves destroying his his shit squad team spirit ever will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bard of Byker Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 http://i56.tinypic.com/2hdr534.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 If Pardew's appointed, I'm done until MA is gone. In principle at least. I'm not sure if I'll be able to stay away, but I'll try. It'll be hard when I love all of our team. I'm thinking similar. Recent work commitments mean I struggle to make games at the minute, but if Pardew's in, it'll soften the blow. Got tickets for Boxing Day and will go like, but I'll probably be looking forward to the piss-up before and after more! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The_Scoreboard Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 How many people will be finished if he gets the job If this happens then probably me until a new regime is installed, even though I've got a season ticket. makes me so fooked off when i think about how i fell into the whole stability thing and how things have been turned around by hughton, then he still does things like this and the ever growing amount of sports direct signs around the ground. Either of the 'Martins' will be acceptable but pardew can fook right off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 I'm still having my free tickets I won. Only cos they're free, mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 If Pardew's appointed, I'm done until MA is gone. In principle at least. I'm not sure if I'll be able to stay away, but I'll try. It'll be hard when I love all of our team. Some sense from you, at last. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest afternoonfix Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 blah blah shite - whoever is appointed ,we'll all follow on regardless, its always the same - curse of being a supporter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 Our options are basically him or Beardsley on a permanent I reckon. Not sure which I would prefer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karjala Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 Wonder how many season tickets we'll sell if Pardew is appointed? Fucking show once again thats theres absolutely no future in Mike Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 the players are still good enough to stay up. our only hope is that they play for the fans because they love us. as opposed to being purposely shit because they hate the manager. i've felt the urge to do this before, but if Pardew is in, i'm out. or will try to be. this club has often made life miserable and i'm starting to doubt whether the 'good times' are worth it anymore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 blah blah s**** - whoever is appointed ,we'll all follow on regardless, its always the same - curse of being a supporter. i'm not so sure this time, many will follow from their armschairs and backpages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts