Superior Acuña Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I'm massively critical of getting rid of Routledge, but I don't believe it was down to Pardew. He has absolutely nothing to gain from it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I'm massively critical of getting rid of Routledge, but I don't believe it was down to Pardew. He has absolutely nothing to gain from it. The comments he made suggested otherwise like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 I'm massively critical of getting rid of Routledge, but I don't believe it was down to Pardew. He has absolutely nothing to gain from it. The comments he made suggested otherwise like. Binning Routledge was a stupid decision at the time and looks worse with every passing game. If it's Pardew's decision then it's another black mark. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 It's incredible to think that Simpson, Lovenkrands and both Taylors ( ) have ended up in his position at some point, like. Mental decision, absolute incredible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 Pardew must have been on a right bender last night and been still pissed at 2.40pm today when he handed over that Team sheet. He then must have been topping up in the dug out when he was making his substitutions. Baffled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 The comment about 4-5 players worries me. We need at least 10 - considering all the rubbish that have to be shipped out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted March 5, 2011 Share Posted March 5, 2011 The comment about 4-5 players worries me. We need at least 10 - considering all the rubbish that have to be shipped out. £35 million on fees and wages will not go far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 At home in the league: P W D L Pts F A GD CH 8 2 3 3 9 16 10 +6 AP 7 2 3 2 9 16 12 +4 And Joey Barton said of one of those Pardew wins: "he's only been here two days, it was the players" Pardew got shown up today for what he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 The comment about 4-5 players worries me. We need at least 10 - considering all the rubbish that have to be shipped out. No chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Nobody buys 10 players in a transfer window man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 At home in the league: P W D L Pts F A GD CH 8 2 3 3 9 16 10 +6 AP 7 2 3 2 9 16 12 +4 And Joey Barton said of one of those Pardew wins: "he's only been here two days, it was the players" Pardew got shown up today for what he is. No better or worse than Hughton? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Nobody buys 10 players in a transfer window man Teams buy 10 players a window on a regular basis. Especially when it's needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Teams buy 10 players a window on a regular basis. Especially when it's needed. We'll get 2 if we want 4 or 5. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 As long as we get two strikers, a LB, a CB and a midfielder (five players), I'll be satisfied with the summer. We do need a complete overhaul, but won't get it in one window. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Nobody buys 10 players in a transfer window man Teams buy 10 players a window on a regular basis. Especially when it's needed. That can't possibly be true? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 As long as we get two strikers, a LB, a CB and a midfielder (five players), I'll be satisfied with the summer. We do need a complete overhaul, but won't get it in one window. Exactly, we will 'lose' Smith, Guthrie and Loven at the end of next season anyway so it will happen regardless over then next 18 months, key is bringing in what we need as opposed to worrying over getting rid of all those we dont in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 The comment about 4-5 players worries me. We need at least 10 - considering all the rubbish that have to be shipped out. You better lend him your copy of FM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Ferguson was stripped and ready to come on when Enrique went down. He then changed his mind and brought Shola on which meant 3 players playing out of position rather than the 2 he originally started with... Fair enough, Ferguson is young. BUT every time he has played he has been pure class. That sub just reflects the whole game. Ferguson should have been brought on and I want to see more of him now on. He is a better option to use than the likes of Guthire. Get a grip Pardew. Don´t like when you loses the plot every second game. "Pure class" is overstating it massively like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Pure class ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 aye. probably "pure class" is a little bit over the top. but compared to his age and experienced, he is. Still he is good a enough to be playing. and playing time will only improve. but to be honest. i think he will be a better LW than LB. think he´s not that good defensively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Got it totally wrong yesterday with his team selection and changes there after but no knee jerk here but for gods sake we have nowt to lose now playing players in there correct positions ,realistically Europe was a possibility and maybe still is but give some experience to the young lads now i.e second half run outs etc when possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Nobody buys 10 players in a transfer window man Teams buy 10 players a window on a regular basis. Especially when it's needed. That can't possibly be true? it's not. I can't think of any team who regularly brings in 10 players a window Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Nobody buys 10 players in a transfer window man Teams buy 10 players a window on a regular basis. Especially when it's needed. That can't possibly be true? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_football_transfers_summer_2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_German_football_transfers_summer_2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Spanish_football_transfers_summer_2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Italian_football_transfers_summer_2010 Sort by 'moving to' and read to your heart's content. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 The thing is we need 4-5 at the moment but then if players leave in the Summer, you could easily be talking of needing 10 players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 We don't need 10 players ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts