Foluwashola Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Don't think it's in danger of getting extended like. This thread alone shows there is room for appeal. It'd be harsh for them to say it was a 'frivolous' appeal. We can just send Foluwashola and sicko in with Tiote Tiote would look class with two white sidekicks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Is this a 1 match or 3 match ban ? I cannot see them extending it.. its will just be a yes or no 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Is this a 1 match or 3 match ban ? I cannot see them extending it.. its will just be a yes or no 3. So we may as well appeal... F they did say no and extend it, that would be an utter disgrace. Not heard one pundit say they thought it was a red card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Nolan; That was not a sending-off in a million years. Even the centre half said afterwards Tiote didn’t touch him. You do anything to win the game, but he stayed down a long time for a centre half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 If they were to take into account the overwhelming swell of opinion and evidence that argues it was a fair challenge, we might have a chance. Just can't see them seeing logic! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Barton's face at the red card http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/TV2/archive/00853/Joey_Barton_853013i.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 If they were to take into account the overwhelming swell of opinion and evidence that argues it was a fair challenge, we might have a chance. Just can't see them seeing logic! i just see them watching the 4 or 5 espn views and after the first one saying it was a deffo red, then after watching the rest telling him he can play in sunday. i'm very honest in how i see my football, barton v liverpool was a red, nolan v everton was a red, i've stated tiote has been lucky to get away with some this season.....but on this occasion he should be in the clear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I'd just like to put on record (in case it wasn't fucking obvious) that I really hope the red card is rescinded. We need him playing and I'd be delighted to be wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Nolan; That was not a sending-off in a million years. Even the centre half said afterwards Tiote didn’t touch him. You do anything to win the game, but he stayed down a long time for a centre half. Just felt the need to roll around on the floor like a prick for a few minutes after for the hell of it eh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Barton's face at the red card http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/TV2/archive/00853/Joey_Barton_853013i.jpg This changes everything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Aye it made Joey nearly cry.. thats enough punishment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Barton's face at the red card http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/TV2/archive/00853/Joey_Barton_853013i.jpg This changes everything. does it or have i missed the joke ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I'd just like to put on record (in case it wasn't fucking obvious) that I really hope the red card is rescinded. We need him playing and I'd be delighted to be wrong. Oh aye, I fucking pray that I'm wrong also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I'd just like to put on record (in case it wasn't f***ing obvious) that I really hope the red card is rescinded. We need him playing and I'd be delighted to be wrong. Oh aye, I f***ing pray that I'm wrong also. Same (obviously) He's our only fucking hope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliMag Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I also voted upheld, but I think it was a legitimate tackle and hope I am wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Nolan; That was not a sending-off in a million years. Even the centre half said afterwards Tiote didn’t touch him. You do anything to win the game, but he stayed down a long time for a centre half. I seem to remember him holding his ankle, quite surprising when you consider he didn't touch his ankle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I don't know what the rules are regarding dangerous play. If you get the ball, is it still considered as dangerous (in strictly 'rulebook' terms)? If it isn't - meaning, by the letter of the law, Tiote's challenge was legal - this is one of the few instances where i think the referees should allow common sense to veto a rule. It was a ridiculous way to go in on the player, perilously close to causing serious damage, and definitely warranted a red card. Players shouldn't go in like that and it's about time it was cut out of the game. I'm still seething over the De Jong thing, which was just as reckless, so you can't really have double standards. Really annoyed with Cheick tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Talking about Poll... Here is the version of Graham Poll as far the the tackling and red card goes: Gerrard's challenge was different to the one by Newcastle's Cheik Tiote at Stevenage on Saturday. To be fair to referee Andre Marriner, at full pace it looked wild, but with the benefit of replays it was clear Tiote had scooped the ball away and a yellow card would have been more appropriate because of the nature of the tackle. Marriner seemed unsure about which colour card to show and, again, where doubt exists, the benefit of any doubt should have gone to Tiote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 It has been clear for years jump in with both feet and you are at serious risk of a red card end of story Personally I'm in favour - if you remember what it used to be like with the likes of Wimbledon, Leeds etc etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 He never jumped in at the player though,Yorkie. It's a shame that their centre half wasn't the one that got twatted after the match btw,give him something to roll around for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Have we even appealed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Loven11 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 From .com : "There was no intent. I've watched it three times and I've gone to see the referee and I will definitely appeal that because I think that's really harsh on the boy. He was obviously trying to get us back in the game and make an impact.'' Post-match comments from Alan Pardew regarding his dismissed midfielder Cheik Tiote. Under the fast-track regulations, the matter will be settled before Newcastle return to action against the mackems next Sunday. So yeah looks like we have or we are going to. I really hope it's rescinded anyway, desperate to have him in for this match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 The differance between this and the De Jong challenge is that Nige's trailing leg was in the air and cutting through Ben Arfa's knee, the old "scissor challenge". Although both were hard lunges and both were fairly needles under the circumstances, Tiote's trailing leg was always pretty much grounded. Can fully understand why a referee would give a red card though to be honest as it's a tough one to call live, but after viewing the replays it certainly wasn't worthy of a red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Any idea when we will find out about the decision then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brazilianbob Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 There isn't a chance it will get overturned. Both feet off the floor, which basically means it was a sending off, Tiote's ban will stand. Agreed, if the feet are off the floor, you are out of control. Fair do's he won the ball, but if the other player had put in an unexpected burst of speed and been where the ball was, Tiote wouldn't have been able to avoid a potential leg breaking tackle because he was off the ground. The ban will stand end of! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now