Guest TC_16 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Very average footballer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Very average footballer. FFS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 He's a good footballer technically but he's missing too much of what's needed for the PL, imo. That said, there's certainly a place for him off the bench in some circumstances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smal Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TC_16 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 He's a good footballer technically but he's missing too much of what's needed for the PL, imo. That said, there's certainly a place for him off the bench in some circumstances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 He's a good footballer technically but he's missing too much of what's needed for the PL, imo. That said, there's certainly a place for him off the bench in some circumstances. Aye, seems to miss that work rate () and desire needed to be able to effectively use the obvious skill he has. Very disappointed in him recently, almost tempted to get Sammy back and send Marveaux to Boro. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudil Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 He's a good footballer technically but he's missing too much of what's needed for the PL, imo. That said, there's certainly a place for him off the bench in some circumstances. In fairness, in the right set-up Marveaux would do just fine in this league. Swansea would be a good fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Marveaux isn't a winger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 He was poor today but he's certainly better on the ball than he showed. Still a definite luxury player though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I thought Marveaux was supposed to be a creative, attacking player. If his job isn't to score goals and create chances for others I have no idea what his role is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 He was absolutely wonderful against Arsenal in that horrific game, wish he could show that form more often Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Another non entity performance from this fella. He is as ineffective as Obertan is, but gets away with it more because he has a better shaped bonce. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TC_16 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Marveaux isn't a winger. Yes, he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I thought Marveaux was supposed to be a creative, attacking player. If his job isn't to score goals and create chances for others I have no idea what his role is. He is and he's has been in the absence of others earlier in the season, are we forgetting that because of 1 poor game? He's incredibly lightweight and ideally should never really feature in our starting XI barring an injury crisis, but you cannot knock his creativity. EDIT: And no, he's not a winger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 It wasn't long back that Pardew was roundly booed for taking him off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
durhamunigeordie Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Exactly, he was our best player for about a month. If not that then at very least our most creative. That injury pre-Villa has cost him dearly - he was just finding a bit of form and rhythm. He's almost a non-entity out wide though. Needs to play through the middle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Marveaux isn't a winger. Yes, he is. Nope. Number 10 or as part of a central 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TC_16 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Marveaux isn't a winger. Yes, he is. Nope. Number 10 or as part of a central 3. He's a winger who plays out wide, on the wing, and is very average at it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 When we signed him and he was being dubbed as a winger I remember Andy Brassell (French footy journo) saying that he absolutely wasn't a winger and never played as once for Rennes. He has never one struck me as a wide player in every game he's played, and I do rate him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I thought Marveaux was supposed to be a creative, attacking player. If his job isn't to score goals and create chances for others I have no idea what his role is. I would still say that he's creative. When he was playing in that number 10 role when Ben Arfa first got injured/Sissoko hadn't signed yet, he looked decent on the few occasions he was able to get the ball down and pick a pass. I don't think he's the answer, but I'm happy to have him as back up, he has his strengths when required and again, I think that match wasn't the right match for him to play in at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Marveaux isn't a winger. Yes, he is. Nope. Number 10 or as part of a central 3. He's a winger who plays out wide, on the wing, and is very average at it. You're thinking of Obertan or something mate. Probably Beausejour as I have a feeling you watching an entirely different side all together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Marveaux isn't a winger. Yes, he is. Nope. Number 10 or as part of a central 3. He's a winger who plays out wide, on the wing, and is very average at it. That's Obertan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TC_16 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all footballers are in the team to create or score goals. I'd much rather midfielders kept hold of the ball and used it wisely rather than making daft passes which only come off 1/5 times. Wingers - like Marveaux - are though. Marveaux isn't a winger. Yes, he is. Nope. Number 10 or as part of a central 3. He's a winger who plays out wide, on the wing, and is very average at it. You're thinking of Obertan or something mate. Probably Beausejour as I have a feeling you watching an entirely different side all together. No as Obertan is fucking shit, not average. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken Dancer Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Definitely not a winger. Nor is he a bad player. Probably similar position to Sissoko, although they play the roles differently. I like him, good player to have in the squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now