Ryan_Taylor Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? Shola-hate is my guess Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. They're hardly very good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. I don't think it will be a problem, even without a new striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 I would love for Saylor to do a Dabizas and score in a 1-0 win to us. In fact, going to put a fiver on that to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. What makes you think they'll find it any less hard going? They don't seem to have a lot of goals in them either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. They're hardly very good. Never said they were. Don't think they'll need to be to stop us scoring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. They're hardly very good. Never said they were. Don't think they'll need to be to stop us scoring. Howay man, you're being over the top negative now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 I reckon Ba might get his first in this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. They're hardly very good. Never said they were. Don't think they'll need to be to stop us scoring. Think positive man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 He's not being irrationally negative. Sunderland played fairly well in parts against Sunderland. We still looked like we were having a pre-season hangover throughout the Arsenal game. Sunderland win looks quite likely to me, and I'd like to think of myself as one of the more optimistic posters! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. They're hardly very good. Never said they were. Don't think they'll need to be to stop us scoring. Howay man, you're being over the top negative now Not really. I'm usually pretty positive when predicting, but on Saturday I saw a side missing cohesion and key components. I'll revise it if we get a striker and a LB in before the weekend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Sunderland played fairly well in parts against Sunderland. O really? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 No reason at all to think we wont be able to score past Sunderland like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 No reason at all to think we wont be able to score past Sunderland like Exactly, we did it 6 times last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Sunderland played fairly well in parts against Sunderland. O really? Yup. Nothing spectacular, but solid defensively and showed signs of promise going forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Without Hatem and a striker I think they'll win fairly comfortably. Based on what? On what I know about both teams, obviously. I just can't see us scoring, man. They're hardly very good. Never said they were. Don't think they'll need to be to stop us scoring. Howay man, you're being over the top negative now Not really. I'm usually pretty positive when predicting, but on Saturday I saw a side missing cohesion and key components. I'll revise it if we get a striker and a LB in before the weekend. Aya, against Arsenal, and we still didn't get beat. I know we're facing the mighty Pennywell Galacticos this weekend, they might win, but to say they'll win comfortably is a bit too negative for me like. Agree about us needing a LB for a positive result though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Sunderland played fairly well in parts against Sunderland. O really? http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000405621/polls_O_RLY_Quite_5239_203004_answer_6_xlarge.jpeg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Sunderland played fairly well in parts against Sunderland. O really? Yup. Nothing spectacular, but solid defensively and showed signs of promise going forward. O really? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Sunderland played fairly well in parts against Sunderland. O really? Yup. Nothing spectacular, but solid defensively and showed signs of promise going forward. O really? You got me. Well played, sir. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 No reason at all to think we wont be able to score past Sunderland like Exactly, we did it 6 times last season. And Ameobi is all that remains Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 No reason at all to think we wont be able to score past Sunderland like Exactly, we did it 6 times last season. And Ameobi is all that remains Ah but this season we have Ameobi Squared, Sammi And Shola FTW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Love that logic. "our team lacked cohesion on saturday, add in more new players and we have more of a chance" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Love that logic. "our team lacked cohesion on saturday, add in more new players and we have more of a chance" We didn't lack cohesion we lacked Ameobies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Love that logic. "our team lacked cohesion on saturday, add in more new players and we have more of a chance" We didn't lack cohesion we lacked Ameobies. Too many Ameobi's was the problem at the weekend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted August 15, 2011 Share Posted August 15, 2011 Love that logic. "our team lacked cohesion on saturday, add in more new players and we have more of a chance" Can't believe I'm sticking up for Ronaldo, but cohesion isn't achieved exclusively through familiarity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts