Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The thing is though, the more people voice their opinions at the match, the more the press will pick up on it.

It's once it gets in the media that it'll make him take notice. He'll not want the full media glare on him and his other businesses.

 

 

 

He'd love to have SD plastered all over the newspapers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is though, the more people voice their opinions at the match, the more the press will pick up on it.

It's once it gets in the media that it'll make him take notice. He'll not want the full media glare on him and his other businesses.

 

 

 

He'd love to have SD plastered all over the newspapers.

He would - but not if it was being associated with our crowds falling to 25,000.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is though, the more people voice their opinions at the match, the more the press will pick up on it.

It's once it gets in the media that it'll make him take notice. He'll not want the full media glare on him and his other businesses.

 

 

 

He'd love to have SD plastered all over the newspapers.

He would - but not if it was being associated with our crowds falling to 25,000.....

 

This. I've often thought of what his reaction would be to a nearly empty stadium for a couple of games. We seem to lack the impetus to organise it though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See John Hall has been interviewed on 5live. Seemed to suggest it's not even worth bothering to compete against the sovereign states, and feels Ashley will struggle to get a coach in.

 

Was barely awake so not sure why, or how accurate that is. Nowt up on their website yet.

 

 

EDIT: Ah. No quotes, but the report say he said we can't compete in the league, and trying to get in a head coach wont work as the good managers want control.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See John Hall has been interviewed on 5live. Seemed to suggest it's not even worth bothering to compete against the sovereign states, and feels Ashley will struggle to get a coach in.

 

Was barely awake so not sure why, or how accurate that is. Nowt up on their website yet.

 

So what? We should just fold now? Grim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See John Hall has been interviewed on 5live. Seemed to suggest it's not even worth bothering to compete against the sovereign states, and feels Ashley will struggle to get a coach in.

 

Was barely awake so not sure why, or how accurate that is. Nowt up on their website yet.

 

 

EDIT: Ah. No quotes, but the report say he said we can't compete in the league, and trying to get in a head coach wont work as the good managers want control.

 

So what? We should just fold now? Grim.

 

KNOW YOUR PLACE.

 

 

/Anywhere up to 5th. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best thing you can do with Ashley is let him crack on until he decides to sell the club. He'll not want the club to leave the premiership, but we will go nowhere else in cups or euro qualification and no amount of protests or fan pressure will change that.

 

Like said any publicity is good publicity, he's been surrounded in negativity since he's come here yet SD has doubled in size. We did that for him, without us he'd just be another retail brand struggling to make an impact on the high street.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is still no excuse to not try to be the best you can within your means.  We don't even do that.

 

It seems that many in the media are starting to see how Ashley runs the club and are openly critical of it and sympathetic to supporters but can you imagine the furore if one of the media's favourite clubs was bought purely as an advertising vehicle for another company and none of the profit generated was re-invested in the club.

 

He will get far more criticism for a similar approach to Rangers because of their importance to Scottish football.

 

People ask why Newcastle fans perceive NUFC to be a "big" club but one that generates (and has the ability to generate more) the amount of revenue it does means that it should be striving to be in the top 7-8.  The media always say a club's budget should dictate where they finish but we constantly fail to do that.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he does go it will likely be either his physical health or his business health forcing his hand and leaving him in a vulnerable position.  At the moment he hold the cards and doesn't need to sell, so anyone who shows an interest will be told to either stump up above market value or fuck off.  If his other interests collapse or he suffers ill health and can't afford the time to run it, then he may be in a position where he has to accept a realistic or even aggressive offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes you wonder if there is anything the football authorities (as toothless as they are) can do with regards to what Ashley is doing, because it's hardly 'sport' - it's not even entertainment, FFS. :(

 

That's what really gets me. A football team and its owner should in principle have the same incentives as the fans. Those should be basic fundamentals but have somehow gotten skewed. How on earth can an owner get away with changing the name of a traditional club to 'Tigers' ffs or changing a team's colour from blue to red? Owners should be absolutely terrified of decisions like this. You have to wonder why it isn't in the best interest of Mike Ashley to provide entertaining football and/or strive for success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes you wonder if there is anything the football authorities (as toothless as they are) can do with regards to what Ashley is doing, because it's hardly 'sport' - it's not even entertainment, FFS. :(

 

That's what really gets me. A football team and its owner should in principle have the same incentives as the fans. Those should be basic fundamentals but have somehow gotten skewed. How on earth can an owner get away with changing the name of a traditional club to 'Tigers' ffs or changing a team's colour from blue to red? Owners should be absolutely terrified of decisions like this. You have to wonder why it isn't in the best interest of Mike Ashley to provide entertaining football and/or strive for success.

 

It's because PL clubs have become the play-things of very rich men, who act on a whim. The government should force through the german model, where no-one person has overall control. However, money and power talk. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Bert Shaft

[You have to wonder why it isn't in the best interest of Mike Ashley to provide entertaining football and/or strive for success.

 

The fat c*nt must be barred from Wembley Stadium.

It's the only thing I can think of to try and explain his aversion to getting there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes you wonder if there is anything the football authorities (as toothless as they are) can do with regards to what Ashley is doing, because it's hardly 'sport' - it's not even entertainment, FFS. :(

 

That's what really gets me. A football team and its owner should in principle have the same incentives as the fans. Those should be basic fundamentals but have somehow gotten skewed. How on earth can an owner get away with changing the name of a traditional club to 'Tigers' ffs or changing a team's colour from blue to red? Owners should be absolutely terrified of decisions like this. You have to wonder why it isn't in the best interest of Mike Ashley to provide entertaining football and/or strive for success.

 

It's because PL clubs have become the play-things of very rich men, who act on a whim. The government should force through the german model, where no-one person has overall control. However, money and power talk. :(

 

It really is bringing the game into disrepute to primarily use a football club to promote an outside interest to the exclusion of everything else and to deliberately try and not compete.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a hard time envisioning things getting better for Newcastle. You have the sackpardew.com campaign which was probably the closest you'll ever get a protest that was actually noticed since that death threat against Mike Ashley.

 

Not having the media on your side, like Liverpool supporters had with their previous owners, you're just not getting anywhere.

 

I'm not say that those who run these protest should give up. But unless you get the national media on your side, along with those 50K+ supporters attending the home games, Ashley will just continue the way he wants....  :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Ashley death threat?! Another manufactured lie by the club.

Pardew said the same about his family getting threatened when they were up here. He then admitted that they do not live up here nor have they ever visited.

 

It's just a matter of time before Chernley's boyfriend has been threatened as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Ashley death threat?! Another manufactured lie by the club.

 

Death threat or not that is not important. What's important is that something led Mike Ashley to put the club up for sale, publicly. Those who like conspiracy theories might say this was just a publicity from the club stunt to make the Geordie fans look fickle, and really backfire the "Cockney Mafia Out" campaign. Whatever has been gained from that has certainly been able to manifest itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ched Evans looks to be going to Oldham. Bad publicity is good publicity for the freight train that is Sports Direct.

 

 

@TonyCowards: After signing Ched Evans the football team will now be known as "Oldham Down".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been said a million times, target SD and you'll soon be rid of ashley

 

Been said even more times, our fans are crap at protests. Always some excuse for not bothering. Usual excuse is looking daft in front of other fans which is amusing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...