Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think that money gives you a massive headstart over other clubs in that league...im just not surr if i can watch rebuild again and try and get promoted all over again

 

If we do go up we would then have that nervy first season back.

 

 

Fuckin snakes n ladders

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

 

But it 'softens the blow' as in getting a parachute payment of 60 is better than getting a parachute payment of 48.

 

Obviously it's nothing compared to staying up, but that's kind of what the phrase 'softens the blow' means.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

 

But it 'softens the blow' as in getting a parachute payment of 60 is better than getting a parachute payment of 48.

 

Obviously it's nothing compared to staying up, but that's kind of what the phrase 'softens the blow' means.

 

But thats over 4 years so the difference in footballing terms is pretty negligable for a club with our massive costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure the TV money just doesn't come in 1 lump sum of 60m anyway :lol: I think some clubs borrow against that or some take it as it comes in, which is what Ashley would do - no?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

 

But it 'softens the blow' as in getting a parachute payment of 60 is better than getting a parachute payment of 48.

 

Obviously it's nothing compared to staying up, but that's kind of what the phrase 'softens the blow' means.

 

But thats over 4 years so the difference in footballing terms is pretty negligable for a club with our massive costs.

 

True, I was just mentioning that I knew it was better than before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

 

But it 'softens the blow' as in getting a parachute payment of 60 is better than getting a parachute payment of 48.

 

Obviously it's nothing compared to staying up, but that's kind of what the phrase 'softens the blow' means.

 

But thats over 4 years so the difference in footballing terms is pretty negligable for a club with our massive costs.

 

still better than 48

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

 

But it 'softens the blow' as in getting a parachute payment of 60 is better than getting a parachute payment of 48.

 

Obviously it's nothing compared to staying up, but that's kind of what the phrase 'softens the blow' means.

 

But thats over 4 years so the difference in footballing terms is pretty negligable for a club with our massive costs.

 

True, I was just mentioning that I knew it was better than before.

 

Technically it is less as we got £16m last time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

 

But it 'softens the blow' as in getting a parachute payment of 60 is better than getting a parachute payment of 48.

 

Obviously it's nothing compared to staying up, but that's kind of what the phrase 'softens the blow' means.

 

But thats over 4 years so the difference in footballing terms is pretty negligable for a club with our massive costs.

 

still better than 48

 

If we spend 4 years in the Championship i wouldnt worry too much about that increase, we will have far more pressing issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the parachute payment absolutely massive this time around as well? Sure I read that.

 

Increase from 48m to 60m over 4 years.

 

In other words a massive decrease compared to staying up.

 

Well obviously, but it softens the blow a bit that's all.

 

Not sure how being paid £45m less is in any way a blow softener like :lol:

 

What are you on about?

 

Sorry it was simple in my mind. Stay up and we get £60m, go down and we get £15m. The difference in the two is £45m which is what we will lose, where is the confusion? Either way its not in any way a softened blow to a club which largely relies on that bigger income to break even.

 

But it 'softens the blow' as in getting a parachute payment of 60 is better than getting a parachute payment of 48.

 

Obviously it's nothing compared to staying up, but that's kind of what the phrase 'softens the blow' means.

 

But thats over 4 years so the difference in footballing terms is pretty negligable for a club with our massive costs.

 

True, I was just mentioning that I knew it was better than before.

 

See your point Ian, i guess though that an increase of £3m a season isn't much of a silver lining. Given our costs it really wouldn't make any dent at all in the problem. A point, i'm sure, understood by all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, obviously it's minor, I didn't think it would turn into such a debate.

 

Anyway, we're not going down so f*** it! :frantic:

 

Think i'm with you on that one, although to be honest, my arse is still pinching my seat a bit!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Sure, obviously it's minor, I didn't think it would turn into such a debate.

 

Anyway, we're not going down so f*** it! :frantic:

 

Think i'm with you on that one, although to be honest, my arse is still pinching my seat a bit!

 

Well we can all agree(pray) for that

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

He has done a great job with getting this club out of economic problems, though he is still the real problem. While Ashley is here this club won´t move any further and Pardew is just a reflection of Ashley himself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...