Stifler Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 They'll get to CL before us. Quite easily. With hardly any investment from Fat Ash Yes but to compete with the levels of money you get from the Premierships TV money they would not only have to get into the CL but progress well in it as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 They already play in sports direct colours too, yes getm it done you fat cunt! Oh no hang about we need a buyer for NUFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 And if he had any plans to buy Rangers why would he buy the naming rights for Ibrox in advance? Surely he's that for nowt when the clubs his. Doesn't make sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 They'll get to CL before us. Quite easily. With hardly any investment from Fat Ash Yes but to compete with the levels of money you get from the Premierships TV money they would not only have to get into the CL but progress well in it as well. He can run that club on much less though and compete in the league, when they get back there, with a lot less investment than you'd need to in the PL. He can leave the club to run it's self, and concentrate on using it as a marketing tool. Which is all he wants to do with us. It'd be very interesting to see some figures on this. How much realistically Rangers need to spend to remain in the top 2 and get him some guaranteed European exposure. He'd hope they can get through to the group stages at least each year with very little financial input and plaster SD all over the place. Someone put together a dossier and send it to him, explaining all the reasons why Rangers are a better club for his tripe than we are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 And if he had any plans to buy Rangers why would he buy the naming rights for Ibrox in advance? Surely he's that for nowt when the clubs his. Doesn't make sense. True, pretty much a story made from someone going 2+2=5. I think him buying Rangers if we were sold is a real possibility (though he may look at it as his fingers being burnt through us and not want to bother with football again) but I don't think he is actively looking to sell us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Could he own Newcastle and Rangers at the same time? No - against FA rules. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Could he own Newcastle and Rangers at the same time? No - against FA rules. Does that count in different countries ? because dont the owners of Watford also own Udinese and Granada. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Yeah, I would like to know your source too. It can't be a FA ruling targeting PL club owners from owning another club in a different league since Man City will have the NYC franchise in the MLS. And the case of Watford as bimpy said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Rangers fans despise him as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Seriously how did Steve Wraith become the voice of Newcastle fans. It's been going on for far too long now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 They'll get to CL before us. Quite easily. With hardly any investment from Fat Ash Yes but to compete with the levels of money you get from the Premierships TV money they would not only have to get into the CL but progress well in it as well. He can run that club on much less though and compete in the league, when they get back there, with a lot less investment than you'd need to in the PL. He can leave the club to run it's self, and concentrate on using it as a marketing tool. Which is all he wants to do with us. It'd be very interesting to see some figures on this. How much realistically Rangers need to spend to remain in the top 2 and get him some guaranteed European exposure. He'd hope they can get through to the group stages at least each year with very little financial input and plaster SD all over the place. Someone put together a dossier and send it to him, explaining all the reasons why Rangers are a better club for his tripe than we are. not with champions league extreme strict advertising structure he won't Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Could he own Newcastle and Rangers at the same time? No - against FA rules. Does that count in different countries ? because dont the owners of Watford also own Udinese and Granada. could be the same person can't own different clubs in UEFA but they might have the 3 clubs in the names of a different member of the family Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 if i remember correct, im sure abramovich had something to do with a club in russia, that chelsea actually met in a uefa competition, but im not sure what it was. something along the lines of a russian team he sponsored with one of his companies ended up playing chelsea.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Get out of our club, get out of our club, Fuck off to Rangers and get out of our club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Get out of our club, get out of our club, f*** off to Rangers and get out of our club. I'm sure he will, just as soon as someone offers him best part of a quarter of a billion pounds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 If you've seen the new Wolverine, that bit where he discovers the insect attached to his heart sapping his healing powers was the perfect reflection of what it feels like having him as owner. If he doesn't die within a decade social Darwinism has failed me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Spoilers FFS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 I've seen the Wolverine, but anyone who hasn't should not scroll up the page unless they want to see a massive spoiler. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 It's really not massively relevant to the plot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Anyone who hasn't seen the film doesn't know that ffs, even though it is very relevant to the middle third and one of the main selling features of the film Leave it out So yeah, a Wolverine spoiler is on the last page... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Sigh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Haha, how fucking dare I try to be helpful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Or self-flatteringly moralistic for a bunch of people you don't know? Either way, I don't care. Ashley sucks, wahey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 If you've seen the new Wolverine, that bit where he discovers the insect attached to his heart sapping his healing powers was the perfect reflection of what it feels like having him as owner. If he doesn't die within a decade social Darwinism has failed me. Cool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 If you've seen the new Wolverine, that bit where he discovers the insect attached to his heart sapping his healing powers was the perfect reflection of what it feels like having him as owner. If he doesn't die within a decade social Darwinism has failed me. I take it thats a massive plot point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts