Guest milburn990 Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 We all secretly know that the fat lad is going to fuck this up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 Wouldn't be surprised if he deliberately sabotages things just to spite us all, fat fucking wretch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 Wouldn't be surprised if he deliberately sabotages things just to spite us all, fat fucking wretch. If he can leave this shitstorm £100m up he’ll be off like the clappers. He’s been lucky with both relegations, next one will be mackemesque. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I'm wondering if he has no intention of selling but wants to keep the protests at a minimum so keeps saying we're for sale. I always thought his valuation was a big excessive and he might be trying to price buyers out. Does it include the debt? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I'm wondering if he has no intention of selling but wants to keep the protests at a minimum so keeps saying we're for sale. I always thought his valuation was a big excessive and he might be trying to price buyers out. Does it include the debt? Supposedly does, although that debt he turned into a interest free loan. What you said about having no intention of selling and him trying to fool people into thinking he does, you wouldn't put it past him and his cronies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I'm wondering if he has no intention of selling but wants to keep the protests at a minimum so keeps saying we're for sale. I always thought his valuation was a big excessive and he might be trying to price buyers out. Does it include the debt? Supposedly does, although that debt he turned into a interest free loan. What you said about having no intention of selling and him trying to fool people into thinking he does, you wouldn't put it past him and his cronies. I still refuse to believe there wasn't any interest that time he wanted to sell us cheap. What was it, £80 million or something? Who wouldn't buy us for that money? I'm guessing there was offers back then we don't know about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 Chill man...............................Rafa's got this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I'm wondering if he has no intention of selling but wants to keep the protests at a minimum so keeps saying we're for sale. I always thought his valuation was a big excessive and he might be trying to price buyers out. Does it include the debt? Supposedly does, although that debt he turned into a interest free loan. What you said about having no intention of selling and him trying to fool people into thinking he does, you wouldn't put it past him and his cronies. I still refuse to believe there wasn't any interest that time he wanted to sell us cheap. What was it, £80 million or something? Who wouldn't buy us for that money? I'm guessing there was offers back then we don't know about. Whatever the figure was, you could add £100m to it and that's why he didn't sell. I never ever thought it was a low as was quoted, he'll never sell for a loss, he's too greedy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penn Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 The financial muscle would be provided by her Gulf backers: PCP Capital Partners is worth $37billion. No journalist writing about this seems to have a fucking clue what they're talking about. Douglas has obviously just read that PCP have £28bn of (other people's) assets under management and then went to Google and translated that into dollars using today's FX rate of 1.32. PCP is basically just Staveley. It's not really worth anything in and of itself and owns basically nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morla84 Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 More wallpaper, just what we need. No thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I will continue to believe that as the journos and everyone else for that matter have no clue about whether there's any truth in this, and given the silence from the two parties themselves, that this must be an indication that both sides are abiding by the NDA that has been signed and agreed. Amanda is most likely performing some sort of pre-purchasing due diligence and having her team of solicitors and accountants analyzing the accounts and all major agreements/contracts in place. The publicly announced price drop from £400m to £380m was Ashley's attempt to turn Steveley's interest into a concrete bid. The NDA publicly announced was a condition of either Ashley or Staveley, flip a coin and there's half a chance you're right, either way there can be only one conclusion: it is happening people. Believe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I tend to agree and Rafa's half smile on Sunday when asked about the situation just confirms it for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I will continue to believe that as the journos and everyone else for that matter have no clue about whether there's any truth in this, and given the silence from the two parties themselves, that this must be an indication that both sides are abiding by the NDA that has been signed and agreed. Amanda is most likely performing some sort of pre-purchasing due diligence and having her team of solicitors and accountants analyzing the accounts and all major agreements/contracts in place. The publicly announced price drop from £400m to £380m was Ashley's attempt to turn Steveley's interest into a concrete bid. The NDA publicly announced was a condition of either Ashley or Staveley, flip a coin and there's half a chance you're right, either way there can be only one conclusion: it is happening people. Believe. And I agree with chopey, Rafa looked far too happy when asked about it on Sunday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I will continue to believe that as the journos and everyone else for that matter have no clue about whether there's any truth in this, and given the silence from the two parties themselves, that this must be an indication that both sides are abiding by the NDA that has been signed and agreed. Amanda is most likely performing some sort of pre-purchasing due diligence and having her team of solicitors and accountants analyzing the accounts and all major agreements/contracts in place. The publicly announced price drop from £400m to £380m was Ashley's attempt to turn Steveley's interest into a concrete bid. The NDA publicly announced was a condition of either Ashley or Staveley, flip a coin and there's half a chance you're right, either way there can be only one conclusion: it is happening people. Believe. Was there an "announcement" of both the sale price and the signing of an NDA? I thought it was just a press story rather than something concrete. Really significant if there has been. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlies Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 The press seem to think 2 nda's have been signed, question is how would they actually know? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I thought it was reported that the NDAs signed are nonthing to do with Staveley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlies Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 It was yeah, but they said 2 had previously been signed. Wonder whos behind those. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Toon Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 The club had a fit when the HMRC wanted to check the books so I doubt they'll hand them over for buyers to have a mooch. Disclosure or not. I just think there's that much smoke about that it's the equivalent of JFK being left alone to cook in the training ground kitchen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I tend to agree and Rafa's half smile on Sunday when asked about the situation just confirms it for me. Is there a link to this? http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/11063687/benitez-pleased-with-newcastle-belief 1:53 in - he knows Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 It was yeah, but they said 2 had previously been signed. Wonder whos behind those. My post was in response to tmonkey. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the leak about NDAs being signed is a false link, as was the Chinese interest that the club purposely leaked in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I tend to agree and Rafa's half smile on Sunday when asked about the situation just confirms it for me. Is there a link to this? http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/11063687/benitez-pleased-with-newcastle-belief 1:53 in - he knows When that interview finished, he walked away sporting a semi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlies Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 It was yeah, but they said 2 had previously been signed. Wonder whos behind those. My post was in response to tmonkey. But I wouldn’t be surprised if the leak about NDAs being signed is a false link, as was the Chinese interest that the club purposely leaked in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 The club had a fit when the HMRC wanted to check the books so I doubt they'll hand them over for buyers to have a mooch. Disclosure or not. They'll just show them a different set of books. You normally have two or three sets depending on if you're trying to sell up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 I tend to agree and Rafa's half smile on Sunday when asked about the situation just confirms it for me. Is there a link to this? http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/11063687/benitez-pleased-with-newcastle-belief 1:53 in - he knows :thup: God damnit! See how much he blinks when answering that compared to all the other questions? Hes fucking lying!! It's true! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 You know they are all trained to deflect questions of this nature that are not related to the game, he does that but it is true he's a little more uncomfortable talking about it for whatever reason, he fidgets around and it's really out of character with the calm demeanor he portrays throughout the rest of the interview. Obviously we are clutching at straws and reading way too much into everything revolving around this right now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts